Foreign policy fatigue? Russian mass media agenda setting strategies and public opinion on the 2018 pension reforms

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ellen N. Leafstedt
{"title":"Foreign policy fatigue? Russian mass media agenda setting strategies and public opinion on the 2018 pension reforms","authors":"Ellen N. Leafstedt","doi":"10.14324/111.444.0954-6839.1237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scholarship on Russian media is beset with the assumption that the Russian public is unable to ‘vote with their remote’ in a homogenously pro-regime media environment and instead passively accepts messaging from the official mass media. This assumption is assessed here in a case study using quantitative content methods to examine the discrepancies between official mass media agenda-setting and public opinion during the period of salience of the news event of the 2018 pension reforms. The pension reform, as an obtrusive domestic political issue in contrast to the unobtrusive international news events which dominate Russian news coverage, stood out as one of the major events of the year in the view of the Russian public. This article finds that official mass media undertook agenda-setting measures to deemphasize negative aspects of the pension reform news events, emphasize positive aspects, and distract public attention towards more sensationalist foreign policy news items. However, it also finds that public opinion priorities on news issues were incongruent with media agendasetting, indicating that official mass media messages are not accepted uncritically by the Russian public.","PeriodicalId":40675,"journal":{"name":"Slovo","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.0954-6839.1237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The scholarship on Russian media is beset with the assumption that the Russian public is unable to ‘vote with their remote’ in a homogenously pro-regime media environment and instead passively accepts messaging from the official mass media. This assumption is assessed here in a case study using quantitative content methods to examine the discrepancies between official mass media agenda-setting and public opinion during the period of salience of the news event of the 2018 pension reforms. The pension reform, as an obtrusive domestic political issue in contrast to the unobtrusive international news events which dominate Russian news coverage, stood out as one of the major events of the year in the view of the Russian public. This article finds that official mass media undertook agenda-setting measures to deemphasize negative aspects of the pension reform news events, emphasize positive aspects, and distract public attention towards more sensationalist foreign policy news items. However, it also finds that public opinion priorities on news issues were incongruent with media agendasetting, indicating that official mass media messages are not accepted uncritically by the Russian public.
外交政策疲劳?关于2018年养老金改革的俄罗斯大众媒体议程设置策略和公众舆论
关于俄罗斯媒体的学术研究被一种假设所困扰,即俄罗斯公众无法在一个同质的亲政府媒体环境中“用他们的遥控器投票”,而是被动地接受来自官方大众媒体的信息。本文通过一个案例研究来评估这一假设,使用定量内容方法来检验2018年养老金改革新闻事件引人注目期间官方大众媒体议程设置与公众舆论之间的差异。养老金改革作为一个引人注目的国内政治问题,与主导俄罗斯新闻报道的不引人注目的国际新闻事件形成鲜明对比,成为俄罗斯公众眼中的年度重大事件之一。本文发现,官方大众媒体采取了议程设置措施,淡化对养老金改革新闻事件的负面强调,强调积极的方面,并将公众的注意力转移到更耸人听闻的外交政策新闻项目上。然而,它还发现,新闻问题上的民意优先事项与媒体议程设置不一致,这表明官方大众媒体信息并没有被俄罗斯公众不加批判地接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Slovo
Slovo HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信