Perfil dos ensaios clínicos submetidos para apreciação ética da Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa entre 2015 a 2019

L. Naud
{"title":"Perfil dos ensaios clínicos submetidos para apreciação ética da Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa entre 2015 a 2019","authors":"L. Naud","doi":"10.17063/BJFS10(2)Y2021164-177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aim to characterize the clinical trials submitted for Conep’s ethical analysis. The protocolos were registered in Plataforma Brasil from 2015 to 2019, and to compare national and international clinical trials. In this sense, we did an exploratory and retrospective study using Plataforma Brasil with extraction of data from clinical research protocols. Only initial protocols were considered. The data were presented by frequency and relative distribution and the comparison was made in relation to protocols with origin from Brazil and overseas. 904 clinical trials were submitted for ethical analysis from phase I to IV. He number of clinical trials remained stable during the analyzed period, with a downward trend for international studies with private funding and an upward trend for national studies with public funding. There was a difference between the profile of national and international clinical trials. In despite of the growing government incentive and a slight increase in the number of national studies with public funding, there is still a huge foreign dependence, which impedes scientific development in the country. The results obtained in the present study can contribute to the debate on clinical research in Brazil.","PeriodicalId":9123,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17063/BJFS10(2)Y2021164-177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aim to characterize the clinical trials submitted for Conep’s ethical analysis. The protocolos were registered in Plataforma Brasil from 2015 to 2019, and to compare national and international clinical trials. In this sense, we did an exploratory and retrospective study using Plataforma Brasil with extraction of data from clinical research protocols. Only initial protocols were considered. The data were presented by frequency and relative distribution and the comparison was made in relation to protocols with origin from Brazil and overseas. 904 clinical trials were submitted for ethical analysis from phase I to IV. He number of clinical trials remained stable during the analyzed period, with a downward trend for international studies with private funding and an upward trend for national studies with public funding. There was a difference between the profile of national and international clinical trials. In despite of the growing government incentive and a slight increase in the number of national studies with public funding, there is still a huge foreign dependence, which impedes scientific development in the country. The results obtained in the present study can contribute to the debate on clinical research in Brazil.
2015年至2019年提交给国家研究伦理委员会伦理评估的临床试验概况
我们的目标是描述提交给Conep伦理分析的临床试验。这些方案于2015年至2019年在巴西平台注册,并比较国内和国际临床试验。从这个意义上说,我们使用巴西平台进行了探索性和回顾性研究,并从临床研究方案中提取了数据。只考虑了初步方案。数据以频率和相对分布的形式呈现,并与来自巴西和海外的协议进行了比较。从I期到IV期共提交了904项临床试验进行伦理分析。在分析期间,临床试验数量保持稳定,私人资助的国际研究呈下降趋势,公共资助的国家研究呈上升趋势。国内和国际临床试验的概况存在差异。尽管政府的激励力度越来越大,利用公共资金进行的国家研究的数量也略有增加,但对外国的依赖仍然很大,这阻碍了该国的科学发展。本研究获得的结果可以为巴西临床研究的辩论做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信