Immediate contact between mother and newborn in the first hour of life: a cross-sectional study

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Bruna Rodrigues Monteiro, Valéria Gomes Fernandes da Silva, Cinthia Daniele da Silva Bezerra, Érika Simone Galvão Pinto, Nilba Lima de Souza
{"title":"Immediate contact between mother and newborn in the first hour of life: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Bruna Rodrigues Monteiro, Valéria Gomes Fernandes da Silva, Cinthia Daniele da Silva Bezerra, Érika Simone Galvão Pinto, Nilba Lima de Souza","doi":"10.15253/2175-6783.20232481594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to compare population and care characteristics of adherence to immediate contact between mother and newborn in the first hour of life in two public maternity hospitals at usual risk. Methods: cross-sectional study with 105 mothers after normal delivery and their respective newborns in the first hour of life in two maternity hospitals with Prepartum, Labor, and Puerperium units. We used an instrument with 36 questions based on the National Guidelines of Assistance to Normal Birth. Analysis was based on the chi-square test for homogeneity and Fisher's exact test to compare the assistance provided in maternity hospitals. Results: both maternity hospitals attended the usual risk binomials. Regarding the assistance provided, only the federal maternity promoted encouragement of immediate contact between mother and newborn in the first hour of life, besides favouring 7.1% (n=3) of the binomials with the golden hour in a correct and significant way (p=0.037). Conclusion: despite the similarity of the assistance profile, only one maternity hospital performed the golden hour, being necessary the insertion of good practices in maternity hospitals. Contributions to practice: direct observation of the assistance provided to binomial identified gaps in the format and and durability of the immediate contact in maternity hospitals.","PeriodicalId":45440,"journal":{"name":"Rev Rene","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rev Rene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20232481594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: to compare population and care characteristics of adherence to immediate contact between mother and newborn in the first hour of life in two public maternity hospitals at usual risk. Methods: cross-sectional study with 105 mothers after normal delivery and their respective newborns in the first hour of life in two maternity hospitals with Prepartum, Labor, and Puerperium units. We used an instrument with 36 questions based on the National Guidelines of Assistance to Normal Birth. Analysis was based on the chi-square test for homogeneity and Fisher's exact test to compare the assistance provided in maternity hospitals. Results: both maternity hospitals attended the usual risk binomials. Regarding the assistance provided, only the federal maternity promoted encouragement of immediate contact between mother and newborn in the first hour of life, besides favouring 7.1% (n=3) of the binomials with the golden hour in a correct and significant way (p=0.037). Conclusion: despite the similarity of the assistance profile, only one maternity hospital performed the golden hour, being necessary the insertion of good practices in maternity hospitals. Contributions to practice: direct observation of the assistance provided to binomial identified gaps in the format and and durability of the immediate contact in maternity hospitals.
母亲和新生儿在出生后一小时内的直接接触:一项横断面研究
目的:比较两家公立妇产医院一般风险产妇在出生后1小时内坚持母婴直接接触的人群和护理特点。方法:横断面研究105名正常分娩的母亲和她们各自的新生儿在生命的第一个小时在两家妇产医院的准备,分娩和产褥期单位。我们使用了一个有36个问题的仪器,这些问题是基于国家帮助正常分娩指南的。分析采用卡方检验检验同质性,Fisher精确检验比较妇产医院提供的援助。结果:两家妇产医院均有正常的风险二项。在提供的援助方面,只有联邦产妇促进了母亲和新生儿在出生后的第一个小时内的直接接触,此外,7.1% (n=3)的黄金一小时二项指标得到了正确和显著的支持(p=0.037)。结论:尽管援助情况相似,但只有一家妇产医院实行黄金时间,这是妇产医院引入良好做法的必要条件。对实践的贡献:直接观察向二项指标提供的援助,确定了在妇产医院直接联系的形式和持续时间方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rev Rene
Rev Rene NURSING-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信