Blood Donation Practices of Tertiary Level Students in South Eastern Nigeria: Prevalence and Determinants

C. Duru, Uche R. Oluoha, A. Iwu, C. Aguocha, I. Ohale, Emmanuel N. Ndukwu, E. Nwaigbo, Nnamdi P. Okafor
{"title":"Blood Donation Practices of Tertiary Level Students in South Eastern Nigeria: Prevalence and Determinants","authors":"C. Duru, Uche R. Oluoha, A. Iwu, C. Aguocha, I. Ohale, Emmanuel N. Ndukwu, E. Nwaigbo, Nnamdi P. Okafor","doi":"10.9734/ibrr/2019/v10i230116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Safe and adequate blood donation is critical in saving millions of lives annually. In many developing including Nigeria, there is paucity of blood donors. Aim: In this study, we assessed the blood donation practices of tertiary level students in Imo State, South East Nigeria as well as its prevalence and determinants. Methodology: Multistage sampling technique was used. Stage one involved the stratification of the institutions into universities and non-universities. In stage two, one university and one non university was selected using simple random method. Stage three involved the selection of study participants from the student registry using systematic sampling method. Self-administered Original Research Article Duru et al.; IBRR, 10(2): 1-12, 2019; Article no.IBRR.53461 2 questionnaire was the study instrument. Data analysis was with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM – SPSS) version 20. Results: Six hundred (600) undergraduates participated in the study. The mean age of the respondents was 21.3 ± 5.0 years. The one year prevalence of blood donation in this study was 13.8% and 63.1% of the non-donors were willing to donate. Respondents aged 15 – 29 years more willing to donate blood compared to those aged 30 – 44 years (OR = 3.03, p = 0.0003), those that were single were 4 times more willing to donate in comparison to those that were married/divorced (OR = 4.02, p < 0.0001). Respondents that were of Catholic faith were also more willing to donate compared to those that were of Pentecostal/Orthodox denomination (OR = 2.72, p = <0.0001). Class distribution and residence were not independent predictors of willingness to donate blood. Conclusion: From the findings in this study, it was obvious that the willingness to donate blood is far greater than the actual act of donating blood. There is need to continue to reach out to those willing to donate but do not know how to go about it.","PeriodicalId":13659,"journal":{"name":"International Blood Research & Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Blood Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ibrr/2019/v10i230116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Safe and adequate blood donation is critical in saving millions of lives annually. In many developing including Nigeria, there is paucity of blood donors. Aim: In this study, we assessed the blood donation practices of tertiary level students in Imo State, South East Nigeria as well as its prevalence and determinants. Methodology: Multistage sampling technique was used. Stage one involved the stratification of the institutions into universities and non-universities. In stage two, one university and one non university was selected using simple random method. Stage three involved the selection of study participants from the student registry using systematic sampling method. Self-administered Original Research Article Duru et al.; IBRR, 10(2): 1-12, 2019; Article no.IBRR.53461 2 questionnaire was the study instrument. Data analysis was with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM – SPSS) version 20. Results: Six hundred (600) undergraduates participated in the study. The mean age of the respondents was 21.3 ± 5.0 years. The one year prevalence of blood donation in this study was 13.8% and 63.1% of the non-donors were willing to donate. Respondents aged 15 – 29 years more willing to donate blood compared to those aged 30 – 44 years (OR = 3.03, p = 0.0003), those that were single were 4 times more willing to donate in comparison to those that were married/divorced (OR = 4.02, p < 0.0001). Respondents that were of Catholic faith were also more willing to donate compared to those that were of Pentecostal/Orthodox denomination (OR = 2.72, p = <0.0001). Class distribution and residence were not independent predictors of willingness to donate blood. Conclusion: From the findings in this study, it was obvious that the willingness to donate blood is far greater than the actual act of donating blood. There is need to continue to reach out to those willing to donate but do not know how to go about it.
尼日利亚东南部高等教育学生的献血实践:流行程度和决定因素
安全充足的献血对于每年挽救数百万人的生命至关重要。在包括尼日利亚在内的许多发展中国家,献血者缺乏。目的:在本研究中,我们评估了尼日利亚东南部伊莫州高等教育学生的献血行为及其流行程度和决定因素。方法:采用多阶段抽样技术。第一阶段是将机构分层为大学和非大学。在第二阶段,采用简单随机的方法选择一所大学和一所非大学。第三阶段涉及使用系统抽样方法从学生登记册中选择研究参与者。Duru等人;中国生物医学工程学报,2019,35 (2):1-12;文章no.IBRR。53461 2份问卷为研究工具。数据分析使用Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM - SPSS) version 20。结果:600名大学生参与了本研究。受访者平均年龄21.3±5.0岁。本研究一年的献血率为13.8%,非献血者中有63.1%的人愿意献血。15 ~ 29岁的被调查者献血意愿比30 ~ 44岁的被调查者高(OR = 3.03, p = 0.0003),单身被调查者献血意愿比已婚/离婚被调查者高4倍(OR = 4.02, p < 0.0001)。信仰天主教的受访者也比信仰五旬节派/东正教的受访者更愿意捐赠(OR = 2.72, p = <0.0001)。阶级分布和居住地不是献血意愿的独立预测因子。结论:从本研究的发现可以明显看出,献血的意愿远远大于实际献血的行为。有必要继续接触那些愿意捐赠但不知道如何去做的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信