Analysis of Students’ Chemical Bonding Misconception with A Four-Tier Diagnostic Test

Rosyidah Syafaatur Rohmah, Nikmatin Sholichah, Y. N. Pratiwi, R. N. Analita
{"title":"Analysis of Students’ Chemical Bonding Misconception with A Four-Tier Diagnostic Test","authors":"Rosyidah Syafaatur Rohmah, Nikmatin Sholichah, Y. N. Pratiwi, R. N. Analita","doi":"10.15575/jtk.v7i2.20343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students had difficulty understanding the chemical bonding concept because of its complex and abstract nature. This difficulty could lead to chemical bonding misconceptions. This study aimed to investigate basic chemistry students' misconceptions of chemical bonding. This study used a descriptive research design with a four-tier diagnostic test. The research’s subjects were basic chemistry students. Chemical Bonding Diagnostic Tool (CBDT) was used as an instrument to determine students' misconceptions. The results showed that students who had misconceptions about ionic, covalent, and coordinate covalent bonding were 48.90%, 53.00%, and 37.50%, respectively. The misconception in this course is that students need to learn about ionic bonds formed by electrostatic forces between cations and anions. As a result, students cannot determine the difference in electronegativity values in ionic and covalent bonds and the number of valence electrons of each atom in a chemical bonding. Therefore, the misconception is in the moderate category.","PeriodicalId":33527,"journal":{"name":"JTK Jurnal Tadris Kimiya","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTK Jurnal Tadris Kimiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v7i2.20343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Students had difficulty understanding the chemical bonding concept because of its complex and abstract nature. This difficulty could lead to chemical bonding misconceptions. This study aimed to investigate basic chemistry students' misconceptions of chemical bonding. This study used a descriptive research design with a four-tier diagnostic test. The research’s subjects were basic chemistry students. Chemical Bonding Diagnostic Tool (CBDT) was used as an instrument to determine students' misconceptions. The results showed that students who had misconceptions about ionic, covalent, and coordinate covalent bonding were 48.90%, 53.00%, and 37.50%, respectively. The misconception in this course is that students need to learn about ionic bonds formed by electrostatic forces between cations and anions. As a result, students cannot determine the difference in electronegativity values in ionic and covalent bonds and the number of valence electrons of each atom in a chemical bonding. Therefore, the misconception is in the moderate category.
用四级诊断测验分析学生化学键误解
学生很难理解化学键的概念,因为它的复杂性和抽象性。这一困难可能导致化学键的误解。本研究旨在探讨基础化学学生对化学键的误解。本研究采用描述性研究设计,采用四层诊断测试。研究对象是基础化学专业的学生。使用化学键诊断工具(CBDT)作为确定学生误解的工具。结果表明,对离子键、共价键和配位共价键存在误解的学生比例分别为48.90%、53.00%和37.50%。本课程的误解是学生需要学习阳离子和阴离子之间由静电力形成的离子键。因此,学生无法确定离子和共价键的电负性值的差异以及化学键中每个原子的价电子数。因此,误解属于中等范畴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信