Recognition of Wildlife Amenity Values in Defining the Small Forest Ownership Problem in the United States: A Literature Review

T. Straka
{"title":"Recognition of Wildlife Amenity Values in Defining the Small Forest Ownership Problem in the United States: A Literature Review","authors":"T. Straka","doi":"10.2461/WBP.2011.7.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nonindustrial private forest or family forest problem originated early in the twentieth century and still exists today. These owners were seen to manage their lands in a suboptimal manner resulting in low forest productivity relative to other ownership groups, leading to future timber supply problems. Over time these concerns lessened, but numerous federal forestry incentive programs still exist today to ensure family forest lands are \"properly\" managed. Since family forest owners control nearly two-thirds of American private forest land, this concern can be defended. Policies that impact the family forests will coincidentally often become important wildlife policies. The NIPF and family forest literature is examined to identify the transition in the NIPF problem from one centered solely on timber to one that considers the broader values of the forest, especially wildlife. This literature also describes many natural resource management relationships and policy tools that directly related to wildlife policy. The interaction of forest and wildlife policies is a fascinating aspect of the human dimension of wildlife. The literature review is extensive so that wildlife researchers will have a source to identify this important research resource.","PeriodicalId":89522,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2461/WBP.2011.7.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The nonindustrial private forest or family forest problem originated early in the twentieth century and still exists today. These owners were seen to manage their lands in a suboptimal manner resulting in low forest productivity relative to other ownership groups, leading to future timber supply problems. Over time these concerns lessened, but numerous federal forestry incentive programs still exist today to ensure family forest lands are "properly" managed. Since family forest owners control nearly two-thirds of American private forest land, this concern can be defended. Policies that impact the family forests will coincidentally often become important wildlife policies. The NIPF and family forest literature is examined to identify the transition in the NIPF problem from one centered solely on timber to one that considers the broader values of the forest, especially wildlife. This literature also describes many natural resource management relationships and policy tools that directly related to wildlife policy. The interaction of forest and wildlife policies is a fascinating aspect of the human dimension of wildlife. The literature review is extensive so that wildlife researchers will have a source to identify this important research resource.
美国小森林所有权问题中对野生动物舒适价值的认识:文献综述
非工业私有林或家庭林问题起源于20世纪初,至今仍存在。人们认为这些所有者管理土地的方式不够理想,导致森林生产力低于其他所有权群体,从而导致未来的木材供应问题。随着时间的推移,这些担忧减少了,但今天仍然存在许多联邦林业激励计划,以确保家庭林地得到“妥善”管理。由于家庭森林所有者控制着美国近三分之二的私人森林土地,这种担忧是可以辩护的。影响家庭森林的政策往往巧合地成为重要的野生动物政策。NIPF和家庭森林文献进行了检查,以确定NIPF问题的过渡,从一个仅仅以木材为中心到一个考虑森林,特别是野生动物的更广泛价值的问题。本文献还描述了许多与野生动物政策直接相关的自然资源管理关系和政策工具。森林和野生动物政策的相互作用是野生动物人类层面的一个引人入胜的方面。文献综述是广泛的,因此野生动物研究人员将有一个来源,以确定这一重要的研究资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信