Understanding Problem-Solving Errors by Students with Learning Disabilities in Standards-Based and Traditional Curricula.

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Emily C. Bouck, Mary K. Bouck, G. Joshi, Linley Johnson
{"title":"Understanding Problem-Solving Errors by Students with Learning Disabilities in Standards-Based and Traditional Curricula.","authors":"Emily C. Bouck, Mary K. Bouck, G. Joshi, Linley Johnson","doi":"10.18666/LDMJ-2016-V21-I1-6896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students with learning disabilities struggle with word problems in mathematics classes. Understanding the type of errors students make when working through such mathematical problems can further describe student performance and highlight student difficulties. Through the use of error codes, researchers analyzed the type of errors made by 14 sixth grade and 15 seventh grade students with language-based learning disabilities educated with either a standards-based or traditional mathematics curricula on word problems representing number and operations and algebra standards. Two main findings occurred: (a) the open-ended word problems were challenging to students with learning disabilities as demonstrated through the high rate of unanswered questions and incorrect answers, with the most frequently committed errors representing a lack of understanding of the mathematics; and (b) no relationship existed between curricula and correct or unanswered questions for sixth grade, but statistically significant relationships existed in the seventh grade, favoring the standards-based curriculum.","PeriodicalId":42442,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"14-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2016-V21-I1-6896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Students with learning disabilities struggle with word problems in mathematics classes. Understanding the type of errors students make when working through such mathematical problems can further describe student performance and highlight student difficulties. Through the use of error codes, researchers analyzed the type of errors made by 14 sixth grade and 15 seventh grade students with language-based learning disabilities educated with either a standards-based or traditional mathematics curricula on word problems representing number and operations and algebra standards. Two main findings occurred: (a) the open-ended word problems were challenging to students with learning disabilities as demonstrated through the high rate of unanswered questions and incorrect answers, with the most frequently committed errors representing a lack of understanding of the mathematics; and (b) no relationship existed between curricula and correct or unanswered questions for sixth grade, but statistically significant relationships existed in the seventh grade, favoring the standards-based curriculum.
理解标准课程和传统课程中学习障碍学生的问题解决错误。
有学习障碍的学生在数学课上努力解决单词问题。了解学生在解决这些数学问题时所犯的错误类型可以进一步描述学生的表现并突出学生的困难。通过使用错误代码,研究人员分析了14名六年级学生和15名七年级学生的错误类型,这些学生有语言学习障碍,接受标准或传统数学课程的教育,学习代表数字、运算和代数标准的单词问题。主要有两项发现:(a)开放式字谜题对有学习障碍的学生来说是一项挑战,未回答的问题和错误的答案比例很高,最常见的错误是缺乏对数学的理解;(b)六年级的课程与正确或未回答的问题之间不存在关系,但在七年级存在统计上显著的关系,有利于基于标准的课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
6.20%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信