Survival Outcomes in Stage IV Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Cisplatin/Gemcitabine Versus Carboplatin/Gemcitabine: A Retrospective Analysis in Veteran Patients
{"title":"Survival Outcomes in Stage IV Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Cisplatin/Gemcitabine Versus Carboplatin/Gemcitabine: A Retrospective Analysis in Veteran Patients","authors":"A. Kunthur, E. Siegel, R. Govindarajan","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2020.06.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GCi) is the standard regimen used to treat stage IV urothelial bladder\ncancers. However, most of the bladder cancer patients are older, with poor performance status and renal\ndysfunction, and are not eligible for cisplatin-containing regimens. There are no randomized studies\ncomparing gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) and gemcitabine/cisplatin (GCi).\nMethods: We identified stage IV bladder cancer patients treated within the Veterans Health Administration\n(VHA), healthcare system between January 2000 and December 2010 from Veterans Affairs Central Cancer\nRegistry (VACCR). Overall survival (OS) was visualized using Kaplan-Meier curves and tested for the\nsignificance of the treatment-arm difference using the log-rank test.\nResults: There were 196 patients with stage IV bladder cancer, out of which 78 patients were treated with\nGC and 118 patients treated with GCi. The median OS for all patients was 12.5 months a 95% confidence\ninterval (CI) of 10.0-14.6 months. The median OS for patients treated with GC was 13.4 months (95% CI\n9.8-17.5 months), and that of the patients treated with GCi was 11.7 months (95% CI 9.3-14.9 months). Cox\nregression revealed equal group mortality rates, with GC having a (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.96 (CI 0.72-1.27;\nP= 0.81)) compared to GCi.\nConclusion: Our study is the largest comparing GC and GCi in stage IV urothelial bladder cancer patients.\nIt showed that there is no difference in OS in patients treated with GC and GCi.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2020.06.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GCi) is the standard regimen used to treat stage IV urothelial bladder
cancers. However, most of the bladder cancer patients are older, with poor performance status and renal
dysfunction, and are not eligible for cisplatin-containing regimens. There are no randomized studies
comparing gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) and gemcitabine/cisplatin (GCi).
Methods: We identified stage IV bladder cancer patients treated within the Veterans Health Administration
(VHA), healthcare system between January 2000 and December 2010 from Veterans Affairs Central Cancer
Registry (VACCR). Overall survival (OS) was visualized using Kaplan-Meier curves and tested for the
significance of the treatment-arm difference using the log-rank test.
Results: There were 196 patients with stage IV bladder cancer, out of which 78 patients were treated with
GC and 118 patients treated with GCi. The median OS for all patients was 12.5 months a 95% confidence
interval (CI) of 10.0-14.6 months. The median OS for patients treated with GC was 13.4 months (95% CI
9.8-17.5 months), and that of the patients treated with GCi was 11.7 months (95% CI 9.3-14.9 months). Cox
regression revealed equal group mortality rates, with GC having a (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.96 (CI 0.72-1.27;
P= 0.81)) compared to GCi.
Conclusion: Our study is the largest comparing GC and GCi in stage IV urothelial bladder cancer patients.
It showed that there is no difference in OS in patients treated with GC and GCi.