The need for revision of selected aspects of online Master’s and doctoral student supervision

Q3 Social Sciences
K. Ferreira‐Meyers
{"title":"The need for revision of selected aspects of online Master’s and doctoral student supervision","authors":"K. Ferreira‐Meyers","doi":"10.18820/2519593x/pie.v40.i1.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, higher education institutions have been concerned about their Master and doctoral students, in particular how and when they would be able to continue and complete their research activities and dissertations. Scholars have noted the potential deterioration in the quality of research projects for a variety of reasons (transformation and/ or abandoning of approved research methods, anxiety-related lowered performance rates, altered modes of supervision and delays in completion times). In this article, I discuss the findings of a small-scale study, undertaken in July 2020, on whether there has been a significant change in the supervision of Master's and doctoral students in Africa due to the outbreak and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I used a Google Form online survey to obtain participants' opinion on the frequency of interactions between supervisors and supervisees, the medium of interaction as well as the Master's and doctoral candidates' general progress. The study participants were all instructors in higher education who supervise Master and PhD students. There has been a change in frequency and means of supervision, that there is more reliance on videoconferencing tools and interaction \"at a distance\". However, the data cannot conclusively confirm that there has been a significant transformation in the way students are supervised because many study participants indicated their wish to return to the way things were done pre-pandemic. Nevertheless, there will probably be more reliance on social media, email and other online tools such as Zoom and Skype post-pandemic. In the words of the study participants, \"online supervision is developing\" and \"the pandemic has also given us more tools of engagement, which is good\".","PeriodicalId":19864,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593x/pie.v40.i1.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, higher education institutions have been concerned about their Master and doctoral students, in particular how and when they would be able to continue and complete their research activities and dissertations. Scholars have noted the potential deterioration in the quality of research projects for a variety of reasons (transformation and/ or abandoning of approved research methods, anxiety-related lowered performance rates, altered modes of supervision and delays in completion times). In this article, I discuss the findings of a small-scale study, undertaken in July 2020, on whether there has been a significant change in the supervision of Master's and doctoral students in Africa due to the outbreak and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I used a Google Form online survey to obtain participants' opinion on the frequency of interactions between supervisors and supervisees, the medium of interaction as well as the Master's and doctoral candidates' general progress. The study participants were all instructors in higher education who supervise Master and PhD students. There has been a change in frequency and means of supervision, that there is more reliance on videoconferencing tools and interaction "at a distance". However, the data cannot conclusively confirm that there has been a significant transformation in the way students are supervised because many study participants indicated their wish to return to the way things were done pre-pandemic. Nevertheless, there will probably be more reliance on social media, email and other online tools such as Zoom and Skype post-pandemic. In the words of the study participants, "online supervision is developing" and "the pandemic has also given us more tools of engagement, which is good".
需要修订的选择方面的在线硕士和博士生的监督
自2019冠状病毒病大流行以来,高等教育机构一直关注其硕士生和博士生,特别是他们如何以及何时能够继续和完成他们的研究活动和论文。学者们注意到,研究项目的质量可能因各种原因而恶化(改变和/或放弃已批准的研究方法,焦虑相关的绩效降低,监督模式的改变和完成时间的延迟)。在本文中,我讨论了2020年7月进行的一项小规模研究的结果,该研究是关于由于COVID-19大流行的爆发和影响,非洲硕士和博士生的监督是否发生了重大变化。我采用谷歌Form在线调查的方式,了解参与者对导师与被导师互动的频率、互动的媒介以及硕士和博士研究生的总体进展情况的看法。研究对象均为指导硕士生和博士生的高等教育教师。监管的频率和手段发生了变化,更多地依赖视频会议工具和“远程”互动。然而,这些数据并不能最终证实对学生的监督方式发生了重大转变,因为许多研究参与者表示,他们希望回到大流行前的做法。然而,大流行后,人们可能会更多地依赖社交媒体、电子邮件和其他在线工具,如Zoom和Skype。用研究参与者的话来说,“在线监管正在发展”,“疫情也给了我们更多的参与工具,这是好事”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Education
Perspectives in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Education is a professional, refereed journal, which encourages submission of previously unpublished articles on contemporary educational issues. As a journal that represents a variety of cross-disciplinary interests, both theoretical and practical, it seeks to stimulate debates on a wide range of topics. PIE invites manuscripts employing innovative qualitative and quantitative methods and approaches including (but not limited to) ethnographic observation and interviewing, grounded theory, life history, case study, curriculum analysis and critique, policy studies, ethnomethodology, social and educational critique, phenomenology, deconstruction, and genealogy. Debates on epistemology, methodology, or ethics, from a range of perspectives including postpositivism, interpretivism, constructivism, critical theory, feminism, post-modernism are also invited. PIE seeks to stimulate important dialogues and intellectual exchange on education and democratic transition with respect to schools, colleges, non-governmental organisations, universities and technikons in South Africa and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信