Assessment of enteral nutrition through feeding stomas or gastric tubes in digestive surgery

C. Finaritra, A. Rakotondrainibe, F. Rasoaherinomenjanahary, A. Rajaonera, L. Samison
{"title":"Assessment of enteral nutrition through feeding stomas or gastric tubes in digestive surgery","authors":"C. Finaritra, A. Rakotondrainibe, F. Rasoaherinomenjanahary, A. Rajaonera, L. Samison","doi":"10.5455/medscience.2022.06.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ostomy feeding remains a reference approach for enteral nutritional assistance. In Madagascar, the techniques are still conventional surgical procedures due to the lack of adequate endoscopic equipment. This study aims to evaluate the benefits and risks of enteral nutrition with a two-week follow-up. Included patients who had benefited from enteral nutrition by tube feeding using nasogastric, gastrostomy, and jejunostomy tubes over six months in Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona Hospital. Prevalence, age and gender, current body mass index (BMI), weight, nutritional grade, initial pathology, psychological status, comorbidities, type of feeding stoma, and the surgical technique (gastrostomy or jejunostomy) were studied. After 15 days, the effectiveness of enteral nutrition was assessed using BMI, serum albumin, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) level, as well as postoperative complications and quality of life. The patient's outcome on the 15th day has been determined. The Chi-square test analyzed the associations and Mann Whitney test compared the effects of enteral nutrition by ostomy and gastric tube use. Forty-two patients were included, aged 47(17-78). The sex ratio was 0.5. Initially, the body mass index was 17(12-23) kg/m², the serum albumin value 3.4 (2.5-4.7) gr/dl with a median CRP level of 16 (2-74.2) mg/l. Nutritional assistance resulted in a weight variation between baseline and 15th day. Comparing enteral nutrition by ostomy and gastric tube, only variation of C Reactive Protein on the 15th day has a significative difference. Mortality was 33% (gastrostomy), 31% (jejunostomy), 24% (nasogastric tube). Nutritional support and the choice of ostomy or gastric tube for enteral nutrition were not associated with mortality. The effectiveness of nutritional assistance is still questionable in this study if the results are more promising in the literature. The death rate linked to the initial pathology and the general state of the patients is still considerable, hence the interest in decision-making in multidisciplinary consultation meetings.","PeriodicalId":18541,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Science | International Medical Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Science | International Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2022.06.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ostomy feeding remains a reference approach for enteral nutritional assistance. In Madagascar, the techniques are still conventional surgical procedures due to the lack of adequate endoscopic equipment. This study aims to evaluate the benefits and risks of enteral nutrition with a two-week follow-up. Included patients who had benefited from enteral nutrition by tube feeding using nasogastric, gastrostomy, and jejunostomy tubes over six months in Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona Hospital. Prevalence, age and gender, current body mass index (BMI), weight, nutritional grade, initial pathology, psychological status, comorbidities, type of feeding stoma, and the surgical technique (gastrostomy or jejunostomy) were studied. After 15 days, the effectiveness of enteral nutrition was assessed using BMI, serum albumin, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) level, as well as postoperative complications and quality of life. The patient's outcome on the 15th day has been determined. The Chi-square test analyzed the associations and Mann Whitney test compared the effects of enteral nutrition by ostomy and gastric tube use. Forty-two patients were included, aged 47(17-78). The sex ratio was 0.5. Initially, the body mass index was 17(12-23) kg/m², the serum albumin value 3.4 (2.5-4.7) gr/dl with a median CRP level of 16 (2-74.2) mg/l. Nutritional assistance resulted in a weight variation between baseline and 15th day. Comparing enteral nutrition by ostomy and gastric tube, only variation of C Reactive Protein on the 15th day has a significative difference. Mortality was 33% (gastrostomy), 31% (jejunostomy), 24% (nasogastric tube). Nutritional support and the choice of ostomy or gastric tube for enteral nutrition were not associated with mortality. The effectiveness of nutritional assistance is still questionable in this study if the results are more promising in the literature. The death rate linked to the initial pathology and the general state of the patients is still considerable, hence the interest in decision-making in multidisciplinary consultation meetings.
消化道手术中通过喂养口或胃管进行肠内营养的评估
造口喂养仍然是肠内营养辅助的参考方法。在马达加斯加,由于缺乏足够的内窥镜设备,这些技术仍然是传统的外科手术。本研究旨在通过为期两周的随访来评估肠内营养的益处和风险。包括在Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona医院通过鼻胃管、胃造口管和空肠造口管喂养6个月以上受益于肠内营养的患者。研究患者的患病率、年龄和性别、目前的体重指数(BMI)、体重、营养等级、初始病理、心理状态、合并症、喂养口类型和手术技术(胃造口术或空肠造口术)。15天后,通过BMI、血清白蛋白、c反应蛋白(CRP)水平以及术后并发症和生活质量评估肠内营养的有效性。患者在第15天的预后已经确定。卡方检验分析相关性,Mann Whitney检验比较造口和胃管使用肠内营养的效果。纳入42例患者,年龄47岁(17-78岁)。性别比为0.5。最初,体重指数为17(12-23)kg/m²,血清白蛋白值为3.4 (2.5-4.7)gr/dl,中位CRP水平为16 (2-74.2)mg/l。营养援助导致基线和第15天之间的体重变化。对比造口和胃管肠内营养,只有C反应蛋白在第15天的变化有显著性差异。死亡率分别为33%(胃造瘘)、31%(空肠造瘘)和24%(鼻胃管造瘘)。营养支持和选择造口或胃管进行肠内营养与死亡率无关。如果研究结果在文献中更有希望,那么营养辅助的有效性在本研究中仍然值得怀疑。死亡率与最初的病理和病人的一般状态仍然是相当可观的,因此在多学科会诊会议决策的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信