Al-Manhaj Dan Al-Ṭariq Dalam Metodologi Tafsir

Lujeng Lutfiyah, Moh Sahlul Khuluq
{"title":"Al-Manhaj Dan Al-Ṭariq Dalam Metodologi Tafsir","authors":"Lujeng Lutfiyah, Moh Sahlul Khuluq","doi":"10.58518/alfurqon.v6i1.1775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the differences between al-manhaj and al-ṭariq in the methodology of interpretation. The research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of these terms. A literature review approach was employed, analyzing relevant scholarly sources on the topic. Content analysis was conducted to compare the definitions and usage of al-manhaj and al-ṭariq in various tafsir works. The findings reveal that although al-manhaj and al-ṭariq have distinct appearances, they share the fundamental meaning of being methods or approaches to achieve a goal. However, their usage and emphasis differ in the field of tafsir methodology. Al-manhaj is closely related to the writing style, interpretive school, and general form of interpretation adopted by a mufassir and their tafsir book. On the other hand, al-ṭariq pertains to the research methods and steps used as a practical implementation of the manhaj. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the nuanced differences between al-manhaj and al-ṭariq in tafsir methodology. It highlights the importance of considering these terms in the field of interpretation. By clarifying their meanings and usage, this study provides valuable insights for scholars and researchers in the field of tafsir. It serves as a foundation for further exploration and discussion on the topic, ultimately enhancing the knowledge and understanding of tafsir methodology.","PeriodicalId":33144,"journal":{"name":"AlBayan Jurnal Studi AlQuran dan Tafsir","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlBayan Jurnal Studi AlQuran dan Tafsir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqon.v6i1.1775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the differences between al-manhaj and al-ṭariq in the methodology of interpretation. The research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of these terms. A literature review approach was employed, analyzing relevant scholarly sources on the topic. Content analysis was conducted to compare the definitions and usage of al-manhaj and al-ṭariq in various tafsir works. The findings reveal that although al-manhaj and al-ṭariq have distinct appearances, they share the fundamental meaning of being methods or approaches to achieve a goal. However, their usage and emphasis differ in the field of tafsir methodology. Al-manhaj is closely related to the writing style, interpretive school, and general form of interpretation adopted by a mufassir and their tafsir book. On the other hand, al-ṭariq pertains to the research methods and steps used as a practical implementation of the manhaj. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the nuanced differences between al-manhaj and al-ṭariq in tafsir methodology. It highlights the importance of considering these terms in the field of interpretation. By clarifying their meanings and usage, this study provides valuable insights for scholars and researchers in the field of tafsir. It serves as a foundation for further exploration and discussion on the topic, ultimately enhancing the knowledge and understanding of tafsir methodology.
本研究考察了al-manhaj和al-ṭariq在解释方法上的差异。本研究旨在提供对这些术语的全面理解。本研究采用文献回顾法,分析相关学术资料。通过内容分析,比较了al-manhaj和al-ṭariq在各种工作著作中的定义和用法。研究结果表明,虽然al-manhaj和al-ṭariq具有不同的外观,但它们都具有实现目标的方法或途径的基本含义。然而,它们的使用和重点在工作方法领域有所不同。Al-manhaj与mufassir及其教务书所采用的写作风格、解释学派和一般解释形式密切相关。另一方面,al-ṭariq涉及作为麦加朝圣实际实施的研究方法和步骤。这项研究有助于更深入地了解al-manhaj和al-ṭariq在工作方法上的细微差别。它强调了在口译领域考虑这些术语的重要性。通过厘清其含义和用法,本研究为行政管理领域的学者和研究人员提供了有价值的见解。它是进一步探索和讨论该主题的基础,最终提高对工作方法论的认识和理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书