Professional Practices of Methodical Work in Higher Education

N. Kazarinova, V. Sukhanova
{"title":"Professional Practices of Methodical Work in Higher Education","authors":"N. Kazarinova, V. Sukhanova","doi":"10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-5-55-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. In the article the peculiarities of scientific and communication practices of the methodologists in interaction with the university teachers are considered on the material of the analysis of the ITMO.Expert methodological community activity.  Methodology and sources. The theoretical framework of the research is institutional and structural-functional approaches to the study of university activities. The method used for collecting empirical data presented in the article is a content analysis of the co-messages sent by the participants of the online intensive “Personalized Learning Technologies” on the Zoom-conference, which was held on August 23–27, 2021. The research hypotheses are the following: discussions of new pedagogical practices and new design formats initiated by university methodologists provoke teachers' skepticism, distrust, and resistance. Also teachers may demonstrate vulnerability in discussing new approaches in education.Results and discussion. Testing the hypothesis that discussing new pedagogical practices and approaches will cause skeptical attitudes and distrust on the part of teachers was not confirmed. The patterns of distrust accounted for less than 5 % of the total array of messages. The hypothesis of teachers (especially beginners) being vulnerable when discussing new approaches, a manifestation of which was their refusal to discuss their own pedagogical experience and the problems encountered, was partially confirmed. At the same time due to the organizational and communicative actions of the methodologistsorganizers of the intensive there was formed an atmosphere of trust and safety, so the participants had an opportunity to share their experience or ask questions without being judged by their colleagues. Conclusion. The activity of the pedagogical designer is both an educational activity, aimed at teaching and promoting new educational technologies in teaching, and an organizational and managerial activity, aimed at stimulating the activity of teachers in developing and modeling a variety of knowledge formats. Many researchers suggest characterizing pedagogical design as a sociocultural activity. When designing educational experience and new educational products, methodologists help develop pedagogical traditions and reconsider norms. ","PeriodicalId":75784,"journal":{"name":"Dental Discourse","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-5-55-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. In the article the peculiarities of scientific and communication practices of the methodologists in interaction with the university teachers are considered on the material of the analysis of the ITMO.Expert methodological community activity.  Methodology and sources. The theoretical framework of the research is institutional and structural-functional approaches to the study of university activities. The method used for collecting empirical data presented in the article is a content analysis of the co-messages sent by the participants of the online intensive “Personalized Learning Technologies” on the Zoom-conference, which was held on August 23–27, 2021. The research hypotheses are the following: discussions of new pedagogical practices and new design formats initiated by university methodologists provoke teachers' skepticism, distrust, and resistance. Also teachers may demonstrate vulnerability in discussing new approaches in education.Results and discussion. Testing the hypothesis that discussing new pedagogical practices and approaches will cause skeptical attitudes and distrust on the part of teachers was not confirmed. The patterns of distrust accounted for less than 5 % of the total array of messages. The hypothesis of teachers (especially beginners) being vulnerable when discussing new approaches, a manifestation of which was their refusal to discuss their own pedagogical experience and the problems encountered, was partially confirmed. At the same time due to the organizational and communicative actions of the methodologistsorganizers of the intensive there was formed an atmosphere of trust and safety, so the participants had an opportunity to share their experience or ask questions without being judged by their colleagues. Conclusion. The activity of the pedagogical designer is both an educational activity, aimed at teaching and promoting new educational technologies in teaching, and an organizational and managerial activity, aimed at stimulating the activity of teachers in developing and modeling a variety of knowledge formats. Many researchers suggest characterizing pedagogical design as a sociocultural activity. When designing educational experience and new educational products, methodologists help develop pedagogical traditions and reconsider norms. 
高等教育系统工作的专业实践
介绍。本文在分析ITMO的基础上,探讨了方法学家与高校教师互动的科学实践和交流实践的特点。专家方法学社区活动。方法和来源。本研究的理论框架是研究大学活动的制度和结构-功能方法。本文收集实证数据的方法是对2021年8月23日至27日举行的zoom会议上在线密集“个性化学习技术”参与者发送的共同信息进行内容分析。研究假设如下:由大学方法论学家发起的关于新的教学实践和新的设计形式的讨论引起了教师的怀疑、不信任和抵制。此外,教师在讨论新的教育方法时也可能表现出脆弱性。结果和讨论。讨论新的教学实践和方法会引起教师的怀疑态度和不信任,这一假设的检验尚未得到证实。不信任的模式占所有信息的不到5%。教师(尤其是初学者)在讨论新方法时比较脆弱的假设得到了部分证实,表现为他们拒绝讨论自己的教学经验和遇到的问题。同时,由于方法学家和组织者的组织和交流行动密集,形成了一种信任和安全的氛围,因此参与者有机会分享他们的经验或提出问题,而不会受到同事的评判。结论。教学设计师的活动既是一种教育活动,目的是在教学中教授和推广新的教育技术,也是一种组织和管理活动,目的是激发教师开发和塑造各种知识格式的活动。许多研究者建议将教学设计定性为一种社会文化活动。在设计教育体验和新的教育产品时,方法学家帮助发展教学传统并重新考虑规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信