Production of composite boards from Bambusa blumeana Schult.f. and Dendrocalamus asper (Schult.) Backer

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
L. Aribal, Jason A. Parlucha, Jayson N. Gelaga, Raynilda J. Aribal, P. E. Sedenio
{"title":"Production of composite boards from Bambusa blumeana Schult.f. and Dendrocalamus asper (Schult.) Backer","authors":"L. Aribal, Jason A. Parlucha, Jayson N. Gelaga, Raynilda J. Aribal, P. E. Sedenio","doi":"10.55899/09734449.22/21.2a/330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to produce composite boards from two bamboo species i.e., Bambusa blumeana and Dendrocalamus asper. The composites were termed as “strip-board” and “shavings-board” to indicate that such was processed from shavings and strips, respectively. The strip-board was produced from 1.2 meter poles. The poles were turned into slats and were deskinned, denoded, and further processed into thin long strips. The shavings-board were made from the internodes converted into slats, deskinned, and processed into thin materials. During defibering, the vascular bundles were cooked in three varying NaOH-water concentrations (i.e., 1%, 3%, and 5%) for 3 hours. The cooked bundles were thoroughly washed and dried to 14% MC, applied with polyvinyl acetate, and pressed at 1000 psi. The produced boards were cured, dried, and samples were subsequently tested for tensile, compression, and bending strength following the ASTM D-143-22 standards. The data were analyzed using the 2×2×3 (i.e., species, board type, NaOH concentration) factorial experiment in CRD. Results showed that the pressing pressure used was insufficient to produce void-free boards. No interaction was noted between the three factors, but the main effect indicated that B. blumeana has significantly higher tensile and compression strength compared to D. asper. The strip-boards also obtained the same compared to shavings-boards. Despite the strength properties exhibited by B. blumeana, boards from D. asper were economical because of the lower price per pole and production cost. We conclude that the high pressing pressure was the most crucial factor in producing void-free, tightly compacted dense boards","PeriodicalId":39305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bamboo and Rattan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bamboo and Rattan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55899/09734449.22/21.2a/330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to produce composite boards from two bamboo species i.e., Bambusa blumeana and Dendrocalamus asper. The composites were termed as “strip-board” and “shavings-board” to indicate that such was processed from shavings and strips, respectively. The strip-board was produced from 1.2 meter poles. The poles were turned into slats and were deskinned, denoded, and further processed into thin long strips. The shavings-board were made from the internodes converted into slats, deskinned, and processed into thin materials. During defibering, the vascular bundles were cooked in three varying NaOH-water concentrations (i.e., 1%, 3%, and 5%) for 3 hours. The cooked bundles were thoroughly washed and dried to 14% MC, applied with polyvinyl acetate, and pressed at 1000 psi. The produced boards were cured, dried, and samples were subsequently tested for tensile, compression, and bending strength following the ASTM D-143-22 standards. The data were analyzed using the 2×2×3 (i.e., species, board type, NaOH concentration) factorial experiment in CRD. Results showed that the pressing pressure used was insufficient to produce void-free boards. No interaction was noted between the three factors, but the main effect indicated that B. blumeana has significantly higher tensile and compression strength compared to D. asper. The strip-boards also obtained the same compared to shavings-boards. Despite the strength properties exhibited by B. blumeana, boards from D. asper were economical because of the lower price per pole and production cost. We conclude that the high pressing pressure was the most crucial factor in producing void-free, tightly compacted dense boards
竹材复合板的生产。和竹菖蒲(苏尔特)支持者
本研究的目的是用两种竹子,即青竹和菖蒲来生产复合板。这种复合材料被称为“刨花板”和“刨花板”,以表明它们分别由刨花和刨花条加工而成。刨花板是由1.2米长的杆子制成的。杆子被制成板条,剥皮、去皮,并进一步加工成细长的条状。刨花板是由节间制成的板条,剥皮,加工成薄材料。在除纤过程中,将维管束在三种不同的氢氧化钠水浓度(即1%、3%和5%)中煮3小时。将煮熟的管束彻底清洗,干燥至14% MC,涂上聚醋酸乙烯,并在1000 psi压力下加压。生产出来的板材经过固化、干燥,然后按照ASTM D-143-22标准对样品进行拉伸、压缩和弯曲强度测试。采用2×2×3(即种数、板型、NaOH浓度)析因实验对数据进行分析。结果表明,所使用的压制压力不足以生产出无空洞板。3个因素间不存在交互作用,但主效应表明,蓝莓的抗拉强度和抗压强度显著高于白杨。与刨花板相比,刨花板也获得了相同的效果。尽管青木的强度性能与青木相同,但由于每杆的价格和生产成本较低,青木的板是经济的。我们得出结论,高压制压力是生产无空洞,紧密压实致密板的最关键因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bamboo and Rattan
Journal of Bamboo and Rattan Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bamboo and Rattan is a peer-reviewed scientific journal and provides a forum for scientific articles and reviews on all aspects of fast growing, multi-purpose pliable species. The scope of the journal encompasses income security, craft industry, small to medium size enterprises, industrial fibre and fuel. Articles related to natural distribution and conservation of species, genetics and biotechnology, harvesting and production systems, and environmental applications are also included, as well as papers on marketing and policy restraints in relation to bamboo, rattan and related species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信