Social Comparison Orientation Associated with Psychological Well Being: The Mediated Role of Self-efficacy

Yukai Qiu
{"title":"Social Comparison Orientation Associated with Psychological Well Being: The Mediated Role of Self-efficacy","authors":"Yukai Qiu","doi":"10.17265/2159-5542/2023.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper focused on how social comparison orientation people apply influence their psychological well-being and how self-efficacy plays an important role in buffering some negative influence from upward social comparison compared with someone better in one domain. In Festingers social comparison theory, the social comparison orientation instructed how people process the information they compared for, and related emotion was induced differently. In this paper, 2000 college students in Boston were proposed to participate in two experiments that discuss how different social comparison orientations affect their perception of life satisfaction. For the hypothetical result, we proposed that a high level of engagement in social comparison and ability-based social comparison was associated with less life satisfaction than the participants who had a low level of social comparison and opinion-based social comparison. In terms of coping strategy, we assumed that a high level of self-efficacy, which is the belief in capability to achieve a certain goal, will buffer the negative impact from upward comparison and improve the life satisfaction of those participants who like to engage with social comparison and ability-based comparison orientation.","PeriodicalId":73913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychology & behavior research","volume":"50 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychology & behavior research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5542/2023.02.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper focused on how social comparison orientation people apply influence their psychological well-being and how self-efficacy plays an important role in buffering some negative influence from upward social comparison compared with someone better in one domain. In Festingers social comparison theory, the social comparison orientation instructed how people process the information they compared for, and related emotion was induced differently. In this paper, 2000 college students in Boston were proposed to participate in two experiments that discuss how different social comparison orientations affect their perception of life satisfaction. For the hypothetical result, we proposed that a high level of engagement in social comparison and ability-based social comparison was associated with less life satisfaction than the participants who had a low level of social comparison and opinion-based social comparison. In terms of coping strategy, we assumed that a high level of self-efficacy, which is the belief in capability to achieve a certain goal, will buffer the negative impact from upward comparison and improve the life satisfaction of those participants who like to engage with social comparison and ability-based comparison orientation.
社会比较取向与心理健康:自我效能感的中介作用
本文主要研究了社会比较取向对心理健康的影响,以及自我效能感在缓冲社会攀比带来的负面影响方面的重要作用。在费斯廷斯的社会比较理论中,社会比较取向指导人们如何加工他们所比较的信息,并诱发不同的相关情绪。本文邀请2000名波士顿的大学生参加两个实验,讨论不同的社会比较取向如何影响他们对生活满意度的感知。对于假设结果,我们提出高水平的社会比较和基于能力的社会比较与低水平的社会比较和基于意见的社会比较相比,生活满意度较低。在应对策略方面,我们假设高水平的自我效能感,即对实现某一目标的能力的信念,会缓冲向上比较的负面影响,提高喜欢从事社会比较和能力比较取向的参与者的生活满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信