Admission and discharge criteria for adolescents requiring inpatient or residential mental health care: a scoping review.

Nicola Evans, Deborah Edwards, Judith Carrier
{"title":"Admission and discharge criteria for adolescents requiring inpatient or residential mental health care: a scoping review.","authors":"Nicola Evans, Deborah Edwards, Judith Carrier","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review sought to locate and describe criteria relating to admission to and discharge from inpatient mental health care for adolescents aged 11 to 19 years in the literature.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally, it is estimated that one in 10 children and adolescents has a diagnosable mental health problem. Children and adolescents with the highest levels of need are cared for in hospital, but there is a high demand for beds and a general lack of agreement regarding the criteria for admission to, and discharge from, such units.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>We considered research studies that focused on criteria for admission to and discharge from inpatient mental healthcare units for adolescents aged 11 to 19 years. We included all quantitative and qualitative research designs and text and opinion papers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, British Nursing Index, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, OpenGrey, EThOS and websites of professional organizations for English language citations from 2009 to February 2018. Potentially relevant citations were retrieved in full and their citation details imported into the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information. Full texts of selected citations were assessed in detail against the inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. Findings were extracted directly into tables accompanied by a narrative summary relating to the review objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five citations were included: quantitative research studies (n = 18), qualitative research studies (n = 1), and textual and opinion publications (n = 16). Of the quantitative research studies, 16 used a retrospective cohort design using case note reviews and two were prospective cohort studies. The qualitative study used interviews. The research studies were conducted in nine countries: USA (n = 7), UK (n = 3), New Zealand (n = 2), Israel (n = 2), Canada (n = 1), Norway (n = 1), Ireland (n = 1), Greece (n = 1) and Turkey (n = 1). The 16 textual and opinion publications included book chapters (n = 3), reviews (n = 3), policy and guidance documents (n = 3), reports (n = 3) and service specifications (n = 4). The majority of these were published in the UK (n = 10), with the remainder published in Ireland (n = 2), Australia (n = 2), and USA (n = 2). Research was conducted across a variety of settings including child and adolescent mental health service inpatient and outpatient units, emergency departments and adult psychiatric units. Length of stay, where recorded, ranged from < 1 day to 351 days. Several categories emerged from the data: type of admission process, referral or point of access, reasons for admission to inpatient mental health care, assessment processes, criteria for discharge and reasons for non-admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is little evidence identifying which behavioral or symptomatic indicators suggest that admission is required, beyond retrospective identification of diagnoses attributed to adolescents who become inpatients. The threshold of severity of risk or need is not currently articulated. No studies were identified that drew on the perspectives of adolescents and their families or carers regarding criteria warranting admission to inpatient mental health care, which indicates an important area for future investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":"19 1","pages":"275-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review sought to locate and describe criteria relating to admission to and discharge from inpatient mental health care for adolescents aged 11 to 19 years in the literature.

Introduction: In the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally, it is estimated that one in 10 children and adolescents has a diagnosable mental health problem. Children and adolescents with the highest levels of need are cared for in hospital, but there is a high demand for beds and a general lack of agreement regarding the criteria for admission to, and discharge from, such units.

Inclusion criteria: We considered research studies that focused on criteria for admission to and discharge from inpatient mental healthcare units for adolescents aged 11 to 19 years. We included all quantitative and qualitative research designs and text and opinion papers.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, British Nursing Index, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, OpenGrey, EThOS and websites of professional organizations for English language citations from 2009 to February 2018. Potentially relevant citations were retrieved in full and their citation details imported into the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information. Full texts of selected citations were assessed in detail against the inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. Findings were extracted directly into tables accompanied by a narrative summary relating to the review objectives.

Results: Thirty-five citations were included: quantitative research studies (n = 18), qualitative research studies (n = 1), and textual and opinion publications (n = 16). Of the quantitative research studies, 16 used a retrospective cohort design using case note reviews and two were prospective cohort studies. The qualitative study used interviews. The research studies were conducted in nine countries: USA (n = 7), UK (n = 3), New Zealand (n = 2), Israel (n = 2), Canada (n = 1), Norway (n = 1), Ireland (n = 1), Greece (n = 1) and Turkey (n = 1). The 16 textual and opinion publications included book chapters (n = 3), reviews (n = 3), policy and guidance documents (n = 3), reports (n = 3) and service specifications (n = 4). The majority of these were published in the UK (n = 10), with the remainder published in Ireland (n = 2), Australia (n = 2), and USA (n = 2). Research was conducted across a variety of settings including child and adolescent mental health service inpatient and outpatient units, emergency departments and adult psychiatric units. Length of stay, where recorded, ranged from < 1 day to 351 days. Several categories emerged from the data: type of admission process, referral or point of access, reasons for admission to inpatient mental health care, assessment processes, criteria for discharge and reasons for non-admission.

Conclusion: There is little evidence identifying which behavioral or symptomatic indicators suggest that admission is required, beyond retrospective identification of diagnoses attributed to adolescents who become inpatients. The threshold of severity of risk or need is not currently articulated. No studies were identified that drew on the perspectives of adolescents and their families or carers regarding criteria warranting admission to inpatient mental health care, which indicates an important area for future investigation.

需要住院或住院精神卫生保健的青少年的入院和出院标准:范围审查。
目的:本综述旨在寻找和描述文献中有关11 - 19岁青少年入院和出院住院精神卫生保健的标准。在联合王国和国际上,估计十分之一的儿童和青少年患有可诊断的精神健康问题。最需要的儿童和青少年在医院得到照顾,但对床位的需求很大,而且对这些单位的入院和出院标准普遍缺乏一致意见。纳入标准我们考虑了关注11-19岁青少年住院精神卫生保健入院和出院标准的研究。我们纳入了所有定量和定性研究设计以及文本和意见文件。方法检索2009年至2018年2月MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、ERIC、British Nursing Index、ASSIA、ProQuest disserthesis and Theses、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、OpenGrey、Ethos及专业组织网站的英文引文。完整检索可能相关的引文,并将其引文详细信息导入乔安娜布里格斯研究所信息统一管理、评估和审查系统。根据纳入标准,由两名独立审稿人对选定引文的全文进行了详细评估。调查结果被直接提取到表格中,并附有与审查目标有关的叙述性摘要。结果共纳入文献35篇:定量研究(n-18)、定性研究(n = 1)、文本和观点出版物(n = 16)。在定量研究中,16项采用回顾性队列设计,采用病例记录回顾,2项采用前瞻性队列研究。定性研究采用访谈法。研究在9个不同的国家进行:美国(n = 7)、英国(n = 3)、新西兰(n = 2)、以色列(n = 2)、加拿大(n = 1)、挪威(n = 1)、爱尔兰(n = 1)、希腊(n = 1)、土耳其(n = 1)。16种文本和意见出版物包括:书籍章节(n = 3)、评论(n = 3)、政策和指导文件(n = 3)、报告(n = 3)、服务规范(n = 4)。其中大部分发表在英国(n = 10),其余发表在爱尔兰(n = 2)、澳大利亚(n = 1)、美国(n = 2)和新西兰(n = 1)。研究是在各种各样的环境中进行的,包括儿童和青少年心理健康服务的住院和门诊单位,急诊科和成人精神科。住院时间(如有记录)从< 1天到351天不等。从数据中得出了几个类别:入院程序类型、转诊或就诊地点、住院精神卫生保健的入院原因、评估程序、出院标准和不入院的原因。结论除了对青少年住院患者的诊断进行回顾性鉴定外,几乎没有证据表明哪些行为或症状指标表明需要住院。风险或需求的严重程度的阈值目前尚未明确。未发现有研究利用青少年及其家人或照顾者关于住院精神卫生保健标准的观点,这表明未来调查的一个重要领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信