Sexting: uno studio esplorativo su adolescenti italiani

IF 0.4 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS

Qwerty Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.30557/QW000005

Roberta Migliorato, C. Fiorilli, Ilaria Buonomo, Silvia Allegro, M. B. Ligorio

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study addressed students’ risk perceptions regarding the phenomena of sexting, by considering its association with time spent online, self-esteem, depressive symptoms, at-risk behaviors, and school attainment. Gender differences were analyzed. Participants were 137 Italian teenagers (58% female; mean age = 12.63 years, SD = .48 years). Self-esteem (Questionario di Autostima; Tressoldi & Vio, 1996), depressive symptoms (SAFA-D; Cianchetti & Fancello, 2001), and study specific measures of sexting and behavioral risks were measured. Results showed a negative and significant association between students’ risk perception of sexting phenomena and their at-risk behaviors. Time spent online was the strongest variable negatively associated with protective factors as well as being positively associated with risk factors. Girls showed higherrisk perception of sexting than boys. Finally, risk perception was predicted by adolescent’s gender, self-esteem dimension (i.e., behaviour evaluation) and at-risk behavior (i.e., drugs use, at-risk sexual behavior). Educational implications are discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

性短信:一项关于意大利青少年的探索性研究

目前的研究通过考虑上网时间、自尊、抑郁症状、风险行为和学业成绩与性短信现象的关系，探讨了学生对性短信现象的风险认知。分析性别差异。参与者为137名意大利青少年(58%为女性;平均年龄12.63岁，SD = 0.48岁)。自尊(问卷调查);Tressoldi & Vio, 1996)，抑郁症状(SAFA-D;Cianchetti & Fancello, 2001)，并研究了对性短信和行为风险的具体测量。结果显示，学生对性短信现象的风险认知与其风险行为呈显著负相关。上网时间是与保护因素负相关以及与风险因素正相关的最强变量。女孩对色情短信的感知风险高于男孩。青少年的性别、自尊维度(即行为评价)和高危行为维度(即吸毒、高危性行为)对风险感知有预测作用。讨论了教育意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Qwerty COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Qwerty is the commonly accepted name for the computer keyboard, comprising the first six letters of its top row. When typewriters were first introduced, the keys were arranged in alphabetical order. However this order meant that people typed too quickly such that the keys soon became entangled. To counter this, the keys were displayed in random order and typing speeds accordingly slowed down. In later years, despite the fact that the problem of speed had been completely overcome, the keyboard retained its random order. In our view, this represents an excellent metaphor for the entanglement of culture and technological tools. In actual fact, we regard computer-based technologies as cultural artefacts, representing different depths in the daily work and study activity of individuals, social groups, and institutions. We believe that different models of computer use and activity within online environments mediate social interaction. As such, the relationship between culture and technological tools is becoming more and more complex and now provides an opportunity for determining new models of cognitive, psychological, and social interaction. Qwerty hopes to be a place where such issues can be discussed and developed. The journal arises from a growing awareness of the need to develop research and reflection on the impact, effects and nature of technology use and, as such, is intended to be a genuinely cross-disciplinary forum. Qwerty wishes to provide a forum for discussion on the use of new technologies aimed at anyone interested in the use of technology in such fields as education, training, social and university research, including the cultural, social, pedagogical, psychological, economic, professional, ethical and aesthetical aspects of technology use.