An assessment of phytochemical constituents and antioxidant potential of Delphinium malabaricum (Huth) Munz

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
R. Firdose, R. Swaroopa, V. Vinayak, B. D. Ghansham
{"title":"An assessment of phytochemical constituents and antioxidant potential of Delphinium malabaricum (Huth) Munz","authors":"R. Firdose, R. Swaroopa, V. Vinayak, B. D. Ghansham","doi":"10.5505/TJB.2014.47965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of the study was to examine the efficiency of different extraction methods for the determination of total phenolics, flavonoids and alkaloid contents contributing to antioxidant capacity of Delphinium malabaricum. Methods: The extracts of different plant parts (roots, stems and leaves) of Delphinium malabaricum were prepared in aqueous and various organic solvents and the extracts were evaluated for phenolics, flavonoids and alkaloid contents as the equivalents of gallic acid, rutin, and colchicine; respectively. The antioxidant capacity of the extracts was also assessed by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl free radical scavenging activity and ferric reducing antioxidant power assays in both fresh and dry plant tissues and the difference in fresh and dry extracts on phytochemical constituents and antioxidant activities were compared. Results: The aqueous extracts of roots exhibited the highest total phenolic (4.94 mg gallic acid/g fresh weight, 13.4 mg gallic acid/g dry weight) and total alkaloid content (8.05 mg colchicine/g fresh weight, 20.4 mg colchicine/g dry weight) as compared to stem, leaves and other solvent extracts. Whereas, flavonoid contents were found to be highest in the leaf extracts (5.36 mg rutin/g fresh weight, 7.88 mg rutin/g dry weight). Interestingly the aqueous extracts of all the plant parts exhibited highest yield of phenolic, flavonoids and alkaloids as compare to the other solvents used for the extraction. Antioxidant activity assays exhibited considerable antioxidant potential and showed expected significant positive correlation with the phytochemical compounds. Conclusion: The study specified that aqueous extracts are more effective to extract phenols, flavonoids, alkaloids and antioxidants from Delphinium malabaricum than organic extracts and roots have higher level and the alkaloids were found to be higher comparing to that of phenolics and flavonoids content per gram dry weight of plant tissue.","PeriodicalId":23355,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry-turk Biyokimya Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry-turk Biyokimya Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/TJB.2014.47965","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to examine the efficiency of different extraction methods for the determination of total phenolics, flavonoids and alkaloid contents contributing to antioxidant capacity of Delphinium malabaricum. Methods: The extracts of different plant parts (roots, stems and leaves) of Delphinium malabaricum were prepared in aqueous and various organic solvents and the extracts were evaluated for phenolics, flavonoids and alkaloid contents as the equivalents of gallic acid, rutin, and colchicine; respectively. The antioxidant capacity of the extracts was also assessed by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl free radical scavenging activity and ferric reducing antioxidant power assays in both fresh and dry plant tissues and the difference in fresh and dry extracts on phytochemical constituents and antioxidant activities were compared. Results: The aqueous extracts of roots exhibited the highest total phenolic (4.94 mg gallic acid/g fresh weight, 13.4 mg gallic acid/g dry weight) and total alkaloid content (8.05 mg colchicine/g fresh weight, 20.4 mg colchicine/g dry weight) as compared to stem, leaves and other solvent extracts. Whereas, flavonoid contents were found to be highest in the leaf extracts (5.36 mg rutin/g fresh weight, 7.88 mg rutin/g dry weight). Interestingly the aqueous extracts of all the plant parts exhibited highest yield of phenolic, flavonoids and alkaloids as compare to the other solvents used for the extraction. Antioxidant activity assays exhibited considerable antioxidant potential and showed expected significant positive correlation with the phytochemical compounds. Conclusion: The study specified that aqueous extracts are more effective to extract phenols, flavonoids, alkaloids and antioxidants from Delphinium malabaricum than organic extracts and roots have higher level and the alkaloids were found to be higher comparing to that of phenolics and flavonoids content per gram dry weight of plant tissue.
malabaricum (Huth) Munz的植物化学成分和抗氧化潜力的评价
目的:考察不同提取方法测定马来飞燕中总酚、总黄酮和生物碱含量对其抗氧化能力的影响。方法:分别在水溶液和不同有机溶剂中制备马来飞燕草不同植物部位(根、茎、叶)的提取物,并以没食子酸、芦丁、秋水仙碱等量评价其酚类、黄酮类和生物碱含量;分别。通过新鲜和干燥植物组织中1,1-二苯基-2-苦基肼基自由基清除活性和铁还原抗氧化能力的测定,评价了提取物的抗氧化能力,并比较了新鲜和干燥提取物在植物化学成分和抗氧化活性方面的差异。结果:根水提物的总酚含量(4.94 mg没食子酸/g鲜重,13.4 mg没食子酸/g干重)和总生物碱含量(8.05 mg秋水仙碱/g鲜重,20.4 mg秋水仙碱/g干重)均高于茎、叶和其他溶剂提物。而黄酮类化合物含量在叶提取物中最高(5.36 mg芦丁/g鲜重,7.88 mg芦丁/g干重)。有趣的是,与用于提取的其他溶剂相比,所有植物部位的水提物均显示出最高的酚类、类黄酮和生物碱收率。抗氧化活性测试显示出相当大的抗氧化潜力,并显示出预期的显著正相关与植物化学成分。结论:水提液对飞燕草酚类物质、黄酮类物质、生物碱和抗氧化剂的提取效果优于有机提液,飞燕草根茎中酚类物质和黄酮类物质含量高于有机提液,生物碱含量高于植物组织每克干重中酚类物质和黄酮类物质含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Biochemistry (TJB), official journal of Turkish Biochemical Society, is issued electronically every 2 months. The main aim of the journal is to support the research and publishing culture by ensuring that every published manuscript has an added value and thus providing international acceptance of the “readability” of the manuscripts published in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信