Bedside Evaluation of Hearing: A comparrative Evaluation of 4 Frequencies

S. Khadilkar, M. Singla, Jyotsna Nadkarni
{"title":"Bedside Evaluation of Hearing: A comparrative Evaluation of 4 Frequencies","authors":"S. Khadilkar, M. Singla, Jyotsna Nadkarni","doi":"10.15713/ins.bhj.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tuning fork tests are commonly performed for bedside evaluation of hearing. Even though these have been used by clinicians for many decades, uncertainty exists as regards the most useful frequency. 128, 256, 512, and 1024 Hz frequencies have been utilized by various studies and 256 and 512 have been found to be more suitable than the other two frequencies.[1,2] There are differences in the perceived utility of these two frequencies as specificity and sensitivity issues have been documented with either of the two, along with falsepositive results. We conducted this study to determine the accuracy of four standard frequencies of tuning forks and using pure tone audiometry as the standard reference to determine the most appropriate frequencies for bedside evaluation of hearing.","PeriodicalId":85654,"journal":{"name":"The Bombay Hospital journal","volume":"72 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bombay Hospital journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.bhj.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tuning fork tests are commonly performed for bedside evaluation of hearing. Even though these have been used by clinicians for many decades, uncertainty exists as regards the most useful frequency. 128, 256, 512, and 1024 Hz frequencies have been utilized by various studies and 256 and 512 have been found to be more suitable than the other two frequencies.[1,2] There are differences in the perceived utility of these two frequencies as specificity and sensitivity issues have been documented with either of the two, along with falsepositive results. We conducted this study to determine the accuracy of four standard frequencies of tuning forks and using pure tone audiometry as the standard reference to determine the most appropriate frequencies for bedside evaluation of hearing.
床边听力评估:4种频率的比较评估
音叉测试通常用于床边听力评估。尽管这些方法已经被临床医生使用了几十年,但对于最有用的频率存在不确定性。128、256、512和1024赫兹的频率已经被各种研究利用,256和512被发现比其他两个频率更合适。[1,2]这两种频率的感知效用存在差异,因为两者中的任何一种都记录了特异性和敏感性问题,以及假阳性结果。我们进行了这项研究,以确定音叉的四个标准频率的准确性,并使用纯音测听作为标准参考,以确定床边听力评估的最合适频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信