The country-of-origin and country-of-operations effect on organised labour in multinational companies – exploring the role of labour relations models

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Nina Pološki Vokić, Maja Klindžić
{"title":"The country-of-origin and country-of-operations effect on organised labour in multinational companies – exploring the role of labour relations models","authors":"Nina Pološki Vokić, Maja Klindžić","doi":"10.1177/10242589221119022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While research on managing labour relations in multinational companies (MNCs) has made great strides in recent years, large-scale quantitative comparisons of these companies’ behaviour and the extent to which this behaviour is shaped by country-of-origin and country-of-operations institutional effects are still in short supply. In this article we analyse organised labour activities in 18 countries via a sample of 1872 private organisations – 874 MNCs and 998 domestic organisations – using the Cranet survey database. Research results imply a weaker position of organised labour in MNCs than in domestic private organisations. MNCs from the Anglo-Saxon and Corporatist labour relations environment were found to adapt their labour relations practices to the local setting to a significant extent, while Mediterranean MNCs proved less adaptable. They all recognised organised labour endeavours to a greater extent when required, yet reduced their recognition of these when this was acceptable from a local labour relations environment perspective, implying opportunistic behaviour.","PeriodicalId":23253,"journal":{"name":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","volume":"77 ","pages":"409 - 422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221119022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While research on managing labour relations in multinational companies (MNCs) has made great strides in recent years, large-scale quantitative comparisons of these companies’ behaviour and the extent to which this behaviour is shaped by country-of-origin and country-of-operations institutional effects are still in short supply. In this article we analyse organised labour activities in 18 countries via a sample of 1872 private organisations – 874 MNCs and 998 domestic organisations – using the Cranet survey database. Research results imply a weaker position of organised labour in MNCs than in domestic private organisations. MNCs from the Anglo-Saxon and Corporatist labour relations environment were found to adapt their labour relations practices to the local setting to a significant extent, while Mediterranean MNCs proved less adaptable. They all recognised organised labour endeavours to a greater extent when required, yet reduced their recognition of these when this was acceptable from a local labour relations environment perspective, implying opportunistic behaviour.
原产国和运营国对跨国公司有组织劳工的影响——探讨劳资关系模式的作用
虽然关于跨国公司劳资关系管理的研究近年来取得了很大进展,但对这些公司行为的大规模定量比较,以及这种行为在多大程度上受到原产国和业务国制度影响的影响,仍然缺乏。在本文中,我们使用Cranet调查数据库,通过1872家私人组织(874家跨国公司和998家国内组织)的样本,分析了18个国家的有组织劳工活动。研究结果表明,与国内私营企业相比,跨国公司中有组织劳工的地位较弱。研究发现,来自盎格鲁-撒克逊和社团主义劳资关系环境的跨国公司在很大程度上使其劳资关系实践适应当地环境,而地中海跨国公司则证明适应性较差。他们都在必要时更大程度上承认有组织的劳工努力,但当从当地劳资关系环境的角度来看这是可以接受的时候,他们就会减少对这些努力的承认,这意味着机会主义行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信