Initial and follow-up evaluations on cerebrospinal fluid involvement by hematologic malignancy.

Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-16 DOI:10.1007/s12308-023-00550-x
Nouran Momen, Joseph Tario, Kai Fu, You-Wen Qian
{"title":"Initial and follow-up evaluations on cerebrospinal fluid involvement by hematologic malignancy.","authors":"Nouran Momen, Joseph Tario, Kai Fu, You-Wen Qian","doi":"10.1007/s12308-023-00550-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is a serious complication in hematologic malignancy, and early detection and management of CNS involvement in these cases significantly impact the prognosis. Currently, there is no consensus on the use of multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and conventional cytology (CC) testing for initial and follow-up cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens to diagnose CNS involvement by hematologic malignancy. In our institution, after initial MFC and CC, two subsequent negative MFCs are required before discontinuing MFC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of this approach. CSF cytology and MFC reports were retrieved from Laboratory Information System, and data was reviewed. Between January 2020 and December 2021, 1789 CSF samples from 280 patients were submitted for CSF analysis. For those 517 CSF samples tested by both MFC and CC, 97 cases tested positive by both MFC and CC with 95% concordance. Eighteen cases were MFC + /CC - and 7 were MFC - /CC + . Thirty-six cases had initially positive MFCs followed by more than one MFC evaluation. Among those 36 cases, 22 cases (61.1%) converted to negative after the second follow-up sample, 9 cases (25%) were continuously positive for at least three samples, and 5 cases (13.9%) exhibited negative to positive conversion. Compared to negative CSF cases, positive CSFs had higher total nucleated cell count and higher total protein levels while red blood cells, glucose, and lactate dehydrogenase levels remained at comparable levels. The concordance between MFC and CC was excellent. The high incidence of positive MFCs on two or more follow-up samples and the high frequency of negative MFC to positive conversion indicate the necessity of repeated negative MFCs before discontinuing MFC. The fact that more than half of the positive cases converted to negative after the second CSF specimen and most follow-up positive cases can be detected by CC alone suggests it is adequate to use CC alone for follow-up CSF study after two consecutive negative MFCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12308-023-00550-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is a serious complication in hematologic malignancy, and early detection and management of CNS involvement in these cases significantly impact the prognosis. Currently, there is no consensus on the use of multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and conventional cytology (CC) testing for initial and follow-up cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens to diagnose CNS involvement by hematologic malignancy. In our institution, after initial MFC and CC, two subsequent negative MFCs are required before discontinuing MFC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of this approach. CSF cytology and MFC reports were retrieved from Laboratory Information System, and data was reviewed. Between January 2020 and December 2021, 1789 CSF samples from 280 patients were submitted for CSF analysis. For those 517 CSF samples tested by both MFC and CC, 97 cases tested positive by both MFC and CC with 95% concordance. Eighteen cases were MFC + /CC - and 7 were MFC - /CC + . Thirty-six cases had initially positive MFCs followed by more than one MFC evaluation. Among those 36 cases, 22 cases (61.1%) converted to negative after the second follow-up sample, 9 cases (25%) were continuously positive for at least three samples, and 5 cases (13.9%) exhibited negative to positive conversion. Compared to negative CSF cases, positive CSFs had higher total nucleated cell count and higher total protein levels while red blood cells, glucose, and lactate dehydrogenase levels remained at comparable levels. The concordance between MFC and CC was excellent. The high incidence of positive MFCs on two or more follow-up samples and the high frequency of negative MFC to positive conversion indicate the necessity of repeated negative MFCs before discontinuing MFC. The fact that more than half of the positive cases converted to negative after the second CSF specimen and most follow-up positive cases can be detected by CC alone suggests it is adequate to use CC alone for follow-up CSF study after two consecutive negative MFCs.

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
血液恶性肿瘤累及脑脊液的初步评估和随访评估。
中枢神经系统(CNS)受累是血液系统恶性肿瘤的一种严重并发症,中枢神经系统受累的早期发现和处理对预后有重大影响。目前,对于使用多参数流式细胞术(MFC)和传统细胞学(CC)检测初次和随访脑脊液(CSF)标本来诊断血液恶性肿瘤累及中枢神经系统,还没有达成共识。在我院,初次MFC和CC检测后,需要两次MFC阴性才可停用MFC。本研究旨在评估这种方法的效果。我们从实验室信息系统中检索了 CSF 细胞学和 MFC 报告,并对数据进行了审查。2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,280 名患者的 1789 份 CSF 样本被提交进行 CSF 分析。在同时接受 MFC 和 CC 检测的 517 份 CSF 样本中,97 例经 MFC 和 CC 检测均呈阳性,一致性达 95%。其中 18 例为 MFC + /CC -,7 例为 MFC - /CC +。有 36 个病例最初的 MFC 检测结果呈阳性,随后又进行了一次以上的 MFC 评估。在这 36 例病例中,22 例(61.1%)在第二次随访样本后转为阴性,9 例(25%)在至少三次样本中持续阳性,5 例(13.9%)表现为阴性转阳性。与阴性 CSF 病例相比,阳性 CSF 的有核细胞总数更高,总蛋白水平更高,而红细胞、葡萄糖和乳酸脱氢酶水平保持在相当水平。MFC 和 CC 的一致性非常好。两次或两次以上随访样本的 MFC 阳性发生率很高,MFC 阴性转为阳性的频率也很高,这表明在停用 MFC 之前有必要反复进行 MFC 阴性检测。超过半数的阳性病例在第二次 CSF 标本后转为阴性,而且大多数随访阳性病例可仅通过 CC 检测出来,这一事实表明,在连续两次 MFC 阴性后,仅使用 CC 进行 CSF 随访研究是足够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信