Enhancing students’ global competence through international business study missions

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Chong, B. Gan, T. Menkhoff
{"title":"Enhancing students’ global competence through international business study missions","authors":"M. Chong, B. Gan, T. Menkhoff","doi":"10.1108/JIEB-06-2020-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to share how an Asian university enhanced students’ global competence through international business study missions (BSMs). More specifically, it focuses on how the design of these BSMs enabled “deep” learning beyond industry tourism and how 21st-century competencies such as “global competence” can be acquired through participation in short-term, faculty-led study missions.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing the case study approach, it critically analyzes the learning goals and objectives, design decisions, implementation details and learning outcomes underlying three BSMs led by three instructors from the same university to the USA (New York), Germany (Berlin and Stuttgart) and South Korea (Seoul).\n\n\nFindings\nThe study shows that students gained global competencies related to specific fields of study such as the creative industries, urban sustainability and entrepreneurship. It shows how design choices such as destination, range of organizations, length of individual visits, range of pedagogical techniques, intensity of preparation and quality of management contribute to students’ acquisition of global competencies.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis research presents a subset of case studies that may limit the generalization of the findings; the bias that results from an unrepresentative, opportunistic sample (selection bias); and lack of quantitative causality in a qualitative evaluation.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe course design described here provides practical information for designing study abroad “deep” learning goals, objectives and outcomes focusing on global competence.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe detailed case studies of three instructors from different disciplines to achieve the country’s education vision of globally competent students.\n","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"1 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Education in Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-06-2020-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to share how an Asian university enhanced students’ global competence through international business study missions (BSMs). More specifically, it focuses on how the design of these BSMs enabled “deep” learning beyond industry tourism and how 21st-century competencies such as “global competence” can be acquired through participation in short-term, faculty-led study missions. Design/methodology/approach Using the case study approach, it critically analyzes the learning goals and objectives, design decisions, implementation details and learning outcomes underlying three BSMs led by three instructors from the same university to the USA (New York), Germany (Berlin and Stuttgart) and South Korea (Seoul). Findings The study shows that students gained global competencies related to specific fields of study such as the creative industries, urban sustainability and entrepreneurship. It shows how design choices such as destination, range of organizations, length of individual visits, range of pedagogical techniques, intensity of preparation and quality of management contribute to students’ acquisition of global competencies. Research limitations/implications This research presents a subset of case studies that may limit the generalization of the findings; the bias that results from an unrepresentative, opportunistic sample (selection bias); and lack of quantitative causality in a qualitative evaluation. Practical implications The course design described here provides practical information for designing study abroad “deep” learning goals, objectives and outcomes focusing on global competence. Originality/value The detailed case studies of three instructors from different disciplines to achieve the country’s education vision of globally competent students.
通过国际商务考察,提升学生的国际竞争力
本文旨在分享一所亚洲大学如何透过国际商务学习任务(BSMs)提升学生的全球竞争力。更具体地说,它侧重于这些bsm的设计如何使“深度”学习超越工业旅游,以及如何通过参与短期的,教师主导的学习任务来获得21世纪的能力,如“全球能力”。设计/方法/方法使用案例研究方法,它批判性地分析了由来自同一所大学的三位教师领导的三个bsm的学习目标和目的,设计决策,实施细节和学习成果,分别是美国(纽约),德国(柏林和斯图加特)和韩国(首尔)。研究结果显示,学生们在创意产业、城市可持续发展和创业等特定领域获得了全球竞争力。它展示了目的地、组织范围、个人访问时间、教学技术范围、准备强度和管理质量等设计选择如何有助于学生获得全球能力。研究的局限性/意义本研究提出了一个案例研究的子集,可能会限制研究结果的推广;由不具代表性的机会主义样本产生的偏差(选择偏差);在定性评价中缺乏定量的因果关系。本文所描述的课程设计为设计海外学习的“深度”学习目标、目的和成果提供了实用信息,重点关注全球竞争力。原创性/价值来自不同学科的三位教师的详细案例研究,以实现国家培养具有全球能力的学生的教育愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of International Education in Business
Journal of International Education in Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The journal of International Education in Business (JIEB) is a peer reviewed journal concerned with theoretical and pedagogic aspects of international education in business schools and its flow-on implications for the workplace. The journal publishes papers that are concerned with: - international education, - cross- and inter-cultural aspects of internationalisation, - internationalisation of business schools, - business school teaching and learning, - academic and social engagement of students, - recruitment and marketing of business education in international contexts, - quality processes with respect to internationalisation, and - global organisations as stakeholders of internationalisation. Theoretical and empirical papers (qualitative and quantitative) as well as case analyses are invited. Papers that explore micro- and macro-perspectives in business and international education are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信