KOMPARASI PEMAHAMAN KONSEP SISWA SMP TENTANG HUKUM ARCHIMEDES ANTARA PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK

Farida Nurun Najah, S. Linuwih, H. Susanto
{"title":"KOMPARASI PEMAHAMAN KONSEP SISWA SMP TENTANG HUKUM ARCHIMEDES ANTARA PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK","authors":"Farida Nurun Najah, S. Linuwih, H. Susanto","doi":"10.15294/UPEJ.V4I2.7426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pada materi hukum Archimedes siswa dituntut untuk memahami konsep beserta aplikasinya. Alternatif pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa adalah pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik dan TAI pendekatan saintifik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengetahui ketuntasan pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik; (2) mengetahui ketuntasan pembelajaran TAI pendekatan saintifik; (3) menguji perbedaan rata-rata pemahaman konsep siswa antara pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik, TAI pendekatan saintifik, dan ekspositori, (4) menguji pemahaman konsep siswa yang lebih baik antara siswa pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik, TAI pendekatan saintifik, dan ekspositori. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Brangsong tahun pelajaran 2014/2015. Pengambilan sampel penelitian melalui teknik cluster random sampling . Analisis data pemahaman konsep meliputi uji normalitas Chi-Kuadrat, uji proporsi, uji One Way Anova, dan uji lanjut Scheffe. Simpulan yang diperoleh adalah (1) pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik tuntas mencapai 90,32%; (2) sampel pada pembelajaran TAI pendekatan saintifik tuntas mencapai 75%, tetapi untuk populasi belum mencapai ketuntasan; (3) terdapat perbedaan rata-rata pemahaman konsep siswa antara pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik, TAI pendekatan saintifik, dan ekspositori; (4) pemahaman konsep siswa dengan pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik yaitu 83,4 lebih baik dibandingkan pemahaman konsep siswa dengan pembelajaran TAI pendekatan saintifik yaitu 78,2 dan pembelajaran ekspositori yaitu 72,5. In The Law of Archimedes, students comprehension of  the concepts along with its application is required. Alternative learning to improve conceptual understanding of students are the PBL and TAI of scientific approach. This research aims to (1)  determine the completeness of PBL scientific approach learning; (2) determine the completeness of TAI scientific approach learning; (3) examin ing the differences of student understanding concept among the PBL scientific approach learning, TAI scientific approach learning, and expository learning (4) testing which one were better between students with PBL scientific approach learning, TAI scientific approach learning, and expository learning for students understanding concept. The population in this research was the 8 th grade of students from Junior High School 1 Brangsong in 2014/2015 academic year . The sample of this program was taking by cluster random sampling technic . The data analyzing of students understanding concept include test for normality using Chi-Square, proportion test, One Way Anova test , and further tests with Scheffe. The conclusions obtained were (1) understanding concept of students with PBL thoroughly scientific approach learning reached 90,32%, (2) S ample for understanding concept of students through TAI scientific approach reached 75%, but the population were not passed the exhaustiveness , (3) average difference of students concept understanding occured in students with PBL scientific approach, TAI scientific approach, and expository learning, (4) average score students understanding concept with PBL scientific approach learning (8 3,4 ) was better than the average of students understanding concept with TAI s cientific approaches learning ( 78,2 ) and ex pository learning ( 72,5 )","PeriodicalId":30731,"journal":{"name":"UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal","volume":"403 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/UPEJ.V4I2.7426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Pada materi hukum Archimedes siswa dituntut untuk memahami konsep beserta aplikasinya. Alternatif pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa adalah pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik dan TAI pendekatan saintifik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengetahui ketuntasan pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik; (2) mengetahui ketuntasan pembelajaran TAI pendekatan saintifik; (3) menguji perbedaan rata-rata pemahaman konsep siswa antara pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik, TAI pendekatan saintifik, dan ekspositori, (4) menguji pemahaman konsep siswa yang lebih baik antara siswa pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik, TAI pendekatan saintifik, dan ekspositori. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Brangsong tahun pelajaran 2014/2015. Pengambilan sampel penelitian melalui teknik cluster random sampling . Analisis data pemahaman konsep meliputi uji normalitas Chi-Kuadrat, uji proporsi, uji One Way Anova, dan uji lanjut Scheffe. Simpulan yang diperoleh adalah (1) pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik tuntas mencapai 90,32%; (2) sampel pada pembelajaran TAI pendekatan saintifik tuntas mencapai 75%, tetapi untuk populasi belum mencapai ketuntasan; (3) terdapat perbedaan rata-rata pemahaman konsep siswa antara pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik, TAI pendekatan saintifik, dan ekspositori; (4) pemahaman konsep siswa dengan pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik yaitu 83,4 lebih baik dibandingkan pemahaman konsep siswa dengan pembelajaran TAI pendekatan saintifik yaitu 78,2 dan pembelajaran ekspositori yaitu 72,5. In The Law of Archimedes, students comprehension of  the concepts along with its application is required. Alternative learning to improve conceptual understanding of students are the PBL and TAI of scientific approach. This research aims to (1)  determine the completeness of PBL scientific approach learning; (2) determine the completeness of TAI scientific approach learning; (3) examin ing the differences of student understanding concept among the PBL scientific approach learning, TAI scientific approach learning, and expository learning (4) testing which one were better between students with PBL scientific approach learning, TAI scientific approach learning, and expository learning for students understanding concept. The population in this research was the 8 th grade of students from Junior High School 1 Brangsong in 2014/2015 academic year . The sample of this program was taking by cluster random sampling technic . The data analyzing of students understanding concept include test for normality using Chi-Square, proportion test, One Way Anova test , and further tests with Scheffe. The conclusions obtained were (1) understanding concept of students with PBL thoroughly scientific approach learning reached 90,32%, (2) S ample for understanding concept of students through TAI scientific approach reached 75%, but the population were not passed the exhaustiveness , (3) average difference of students concept understanding occured in students with PBL scientific approach, TAI scientific approach, and expository learning, (4) average score students understanding concept with PBL scientific approach learning (8 3,4 ) was better than the average of students understanding concept with TAI s cientific approaches learning ( 78,2 ) and ex pository learning ( 72,5 )
在阿基米德的法律材料中,学生需要理解概念和应用。提高学生概念理解的替代学习方法是科学方法PBL学习和科学方法TAI。本研究旨在(1)了解科学方法PBL学习的基础知识;(2)确定泰学方法的基础知识;(3)测试学生对科学方法PBL学习、TAI科学方法和出口的平均理解差异,(4)测试学生对科学方法PBL学习、TAI科学方法和exposite学习学生更好的概念理解。本研究的学生是sma Negeri 1 Brangsong年度2014/2015班八年级的学生。通过随机抽样技术提取研究样本。概念理解数据分析包括对chiku - adrat常态的测试、比例测试、一种方法的测试和进一步的Scheffe测试。得出的结论是(1)PBL学习科学方法完成90.32%;(2) TAI进场科学方法的样本完成了75%,但是人口还没有达到结论性;(3)学生对科学方法PBL学习、科学方法TAI和讲解方法之间的平均理解差异;(4)理解学生的概念与PBL方法科学的学习83.4比理解学生的概念与TAI方法科学的方法是78.2,exposite学是72.5。根据阿基米德的法律,学生对概念的熟悉及其应用的要求。对学生的可理解性的替代学习是PBL和科学的粪便。这项研究旨在(1)确定PBL科学完善学习;(2)确定泰科学学习的全部内容;(3)在学生理解的PBL科学学习、TAI science approach learning和exexory(4)中,有一种测试在学生之间比较好,有PBL科学认可、TAI science approach learning,以及学生理解理解的excel。这项研究的人口是2011 /2015年度Brangsong初中八年级学生。这个程序的样本是随机抽样技术的样本。用chi square、相称测试、一种测试和Scheffe进一步测试的测试等都是对正常性的分析。conclusions》获得的是(1)《理念学生和PBL thoroughly科学接近的地方学习的飞地90,32%,(2)S ample for《泰理念的学生通过科学进近75%的飞地,但《exhaustiveness人口是音符昏倒,(3)学生的平均影响理念谅解occured在学生PBL科学及进近,泰美科学及进近,和词语诠释学习,(4)一般成绩学生对PBL科学认可的理解(8 . 4)比一般学生理解我们对有限的学习(78.2)和前正知性学习(72.5)更好
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信