Promoting meaningful assessment in an overcrowded English First Additional Language Intermediate Phase classroom

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sekanse Abiner Ntsala
{"title":"Promoting meaningful assessment in an overcrowded English First Additional Language Intermediate Phase classroom","authors":"Sekanse Abiner Ntsala","doi":"10.5785/37-1-946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides prospects on how English First Additional Language (FAL) teachers working in overcrowded intermediate phase classrooms can assess meaningfully. It is in response to numerous reports that highlight the poor performance in English First Additional Language by South African intermediate learners. Seeing that overcrowdedness has been singled out as one of the possible causes of this reality, this paper integrates overcrowdedness as an important variable. This work, informed by the complexity theory, was steeped in phenomenology as a research design, resulting in the use of the interpretive paradigm. Qualitative research methods were used where interviews and observations provided insight into good practice. Data were analysed mostly thematically, ultimately revealing the significance of assessment tools, the length and weight of assessments, selective approaches to assessments, informal assessments, observations and group assessment. These results illuminated the nonlinearity of the language classroom since other teachers can assess productively despite the number of learners in their classrooms. A notable issue about the insights is that it is rewarding to combine ingenuity and simplicity.","PeriodicalId":43109,"journal":{"name":"Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning","volume":"209 S647","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5785/37-1-946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides prospects on how English First Additional Language (FAL) teachers working in overcrowded intermediate phase classrooms can assess meaningfully. It is in response to numerous reports that highlight the poor performance in English First Additional Language by South African intermediate learners. Seeing that overcrowdedness has been singled out as one of the possible causes of this reality, this paper integrates overcrowdedness as an important variable. This work, informed by the complexity theory, was steeped in phenomenology as a research design, resulting in the use of the interpretive paradigm. Qualitative research methods were used where interviews and observations provided insight into good practice. Data were analysed mostly thematically, ultimately revealing the significance of assessment tools, the length and weight of assessments, selective approaches to assessments, informal assessments, observations and group assessment. These results illuminated the nonlinearity of the language classroom since other teachers can assess productively despite the number of learners in their classrooms. A notable issue about the insights is that it is rewarding to combine ingenuity and simplicity.
在拥挤的英语第一附加语言中级课堂中促进有意义的评估
本文展望了在过度拥挤的中间阶段教室中工作的英语第一附加语言(FAL)教师如何进行有意义的评估。这是对众多报告的回应,这些报告强调了南非中级学习者在英语第一附加语言方面的糟糕表现。鉴于过度拥挤被认为是造成这一现实的可能原因之一,本文将过度拥挤作为一个重要变量进行整合。这项工作以复杂性理论为指导,作为一种研究设计,沉浸在现象学中,导致了解释范式的使用。在访谈和观察中使用了定性研究方法,提供了对良好实践的见解。数据主要按主题进行分析,最终揭示了评估工具的重要性、评估的长度和权重、评估的选择性方法、非正式评估、观察和小组评估。这些结果说明了语言课堂的非线性,因为不管课堂上有多少学习者,其他教师都能有效地进行评估。关于这些见解的一个值得注意的问题是,将独创性与简单性结合起来是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning
Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信