How Satisfactory is Distance Education for Pre-Service English Language Teachers?

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Önal
{"title":"How Satisfactory is Distance Education for Pre-Service English Language Teachers?","authors":"A. Önal","doi":"10.51726/jlr.1160331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several national and international higher education institutions had already started offering distance education to their students; however, the global outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic in the first quarter of 2020 accelerated this process and educational institutions at all levels had to switch to distance education in line with the precautions taken by the governments. It can be argued that neither the educational institutions nor the teachers/instructors and students were well-prepared for such a swift shift. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify distance education satisfaction levels of pre-service English language teachers by shedding light on the variables that may have an influence on their perceptions. A mixed methods research design, involving 122 pre-service English language teachers studying at a state university in Turkey, was employed within the study and both qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed. For the analysis of the quantitative data, descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Mann-Whitney U test were utilized. Likewise, qualitative data was analyzed via content analysis. The results of the analyses indicate that the implementation of distance education is regarded as satisfactory in some respects and unsatisfactory in some other respects. It can be hypothesized that the specification of these aspects will possibly help both educational institutions and teachers/instructors design and implement their distance education operations more effectively since the opinions and perceptions of the students as to the implementation of distance education are revealed within the study.","PeriodicalId":43554,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51726/jlr.1160331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several national and international higher education institutions had already started offering distance education to their students; however, the global outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic in the first quarter of 2020 accelerated this process and educational institutions at all levels had to switch to distance education in line with the precautions taken by the governments. It can be argued that neither the educational institutions nor the teachers/instructors and students were well-prepared for such a swift shift. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify distance education satisfaction levels of pre-service English language teachers by shedding light on the variables that may have an influence on their perceptions. A mixed methods research design, involving 122 pre-service English language teachers studying at a state university in Turkey, was employed within the study and both qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed. For the analysis of the quantitative data, descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Mann-Whitney U test were utilized. Likewise, qualitative data was analyzed via content analysis. The results of the analyses indicate that the implementation of distance education is regarded as satisfactory in some respects and unsatisfactory in some other respects. It can be hypothesized that the specification of these aspects will possibly help both educational institutions and teachers/instructors design and implement their distance education operations more effectively since the opinions and perceptions of the students as to the implementation of distance education are revealed within the study.
远程教育对职前英语教师的满意度如何?
一些国家和国际高等教育机构已经开始向学生提供远程教育;然而,2020年第一季度全球爆发的新冠肺炎疫情加速了这一进程,各级教育机构不得不根据政府采取的预防措施转向远程教育。可以说,教育机构、教师和学生都没有为如此迅速的转变做好充分的准备。因此,本研究的目的是通过揭示可能影响职前英语教师感知的变量来确定远程教育满意度。本研究采用混合方法研究设计,涉及122名在土耳其一所州立大学学习的职前英语教师,并收集和分析定性和定量数据。定量资料的分析采用描述性统计、独立样本t检验、单因素方差分析和Mann-Whitney U检验。同样,通过内容分析对定性数据进行分析。分析结果表明,远程教育的实施在某些方面令人满意,在另一些方面则令人不满意。可以假设,这些方面的规范可能有助于教育机构和教师/讲师更有效地设计和实施远程教育操作,因为学生对实施远程教育的意见和看法在研究中得到了揭示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of the Journal is on research done on language learning and teaching. We are in particular interested in research papers on L2 education (in particular EFL/ESL), in public and private contexts, in natural and classroom settings as well as in a variety of levels including school level, university level, institute level, etc. The Journal welcomes papers on teaching and learning any component of language, including skills and sub-skills, as well as teaching/learning translation, literature, etc. Research on the use of new technologies such as CALL and MALL for teaching/learning languages is also considered appropriate for this Journal. Although the focus is primarily on research on language education, we will also consider papers in other areas of applied linguistics such as language testing as far as they have clear implications for language teaching/learning. Reviews of literature are not acceptable for this Journal; however, status papers by experts in the field are called for as long as explicit implications are drawn in favour of language teaching and learning. Reviews of recently published books on language education are also accepted for publication. Contributors are advised to consult the Journal office before doing/sending a book review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信