Effectiveness of Interventions for English Learners with Word Reading Difficulties: A Research Synthesis

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Emily J. Solari, Karen F. Kehoe, Eunsoo Cho, Colby Hall, Isabel Vargas, Katlynn Dahl-Leonard, Cassidi L. Richmond, Alyssa R. Henry, Lysandra Cook, Latisha Hayes, Carlin Conner
{"title":"Effectiveness of Interventions for English Learners with Word Reading Difficulties: A Research Synthesis","authors":"Emily J. Solari,&nbsp;Karen F. Kehoe,&nbsp;Eunsoo Cho,&nbsp;Colby Hall,&nbsp;Isabel Vargas,&nbsp;Katlynn Dahl-Leonard,&nbsp;Cassidi L. Richmond,&nbsp;Alyssa R. Henry,&nbsp;Lysandra Cook,&nbsp;Latisha Hayes,&nbsp;Carlin Conner","doi":"10.1111/ldrp.12286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study meta-analyzed the last four decades (1980–2020) of reading intervention research focused on improving reading outcomes for English language (EL) students in Grades K–5 with or at risk for word reading difficulties. Experimental and quasi-experimental group design and single-case experimental design (SCED) studies were included; 10 group design and 7 SCED studies met inclusion criteria (<i>m</i> = 61; total student <i>N</i> = 2,270). Visual inspection of the effect size distribution revealed that the assumption of between-study heterogeneity was not supported; therefore, the findings were synthesized for SCED studies separately from those reported in group design studies. Implications for practice, policy, and future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47426,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ldrp.12286","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ldrp.12286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study meta-analyzed the last four decades (1980–2020) of reading intervention research focused on improving reading outcomes for English language (EL) students in Grades K–5 with or at risk for word reading difficulties. Experimental and quasi-experimental group design and single-case experimental design (SCED) studies were included; 10 group design and 7 SCED studies met inclusion criteria (m = 61; total student N = 2,270). Visual inspection of the effect size distribution revealed that the assumption of between-study heterogeneity was not supported; therefore, the findings were synthesized for SCED studies separately from those reported in group design studies. Implications for practice, policy, and future research are discussed.

Abstract Image

英语阅读困难学生干预效果的研究综述
这项研究荟萃分析了过去四十年(1980-2020)的阅读干预研究,重点是改善K-5年级英语(EL)学生的阅读成绩,这些学生有或有单词阅读困难的风险。包括实验和准实验组设计以及单例实验设计(SCED)研究;10项分组设计和7项SCED研究符合纳入标准(m=61;总学生N=2270)。对效应大小分布的视觉检查显示,研究之间异质性的假设不受支持;因此,SCED研究的结果与组设计研究中报告的结果是分开合成的。讨论了对实践、政策和未来研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信