Evaluation of EGF, EGFR, and E-cadherin as potential biomarkers for gastrointestinal cancers

Liejun Jiang , Steven Hochwald , Shuang Deng , Yanhui Zhu , Chunyan Tan , Qiulian Zhong , Ying Zhou , Hongying Zhao , Huayi Huang
{"title":"Evaluation of EGF, EGFR, and E-cadherin as potential biomarkers for gastrointestinal cancers","authors":"Liejun Jiang ,&nbsp;Steven Hochwald ,&nbsp;Shuang Deng ,&nbsp;Yanhui Zhu ,&nbsp;Chunyan Tan ,&nbsp;Qiulian Zhong ,&nbsp;Ying Zhou ,&nbsp;Hongying Zhao ,&nbsp;Huayi Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.flm.2017.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of cancers are still unsatisfactory in clinical management. The seeking of new biomarkers with better performance is still a challenge. EGF, EGFR, and E-cad are soluble biomarkers with clinical potential. ELISA was used to analyze serum EGF, EGFR, and E-cad from 58 gastrointestinal cancer patients and 20 control subjects. Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze Ki-67 expression in tumors. The results were correlated with clinical features. This study found that the preoperative and postoperative serum EGF and EGFR levels were significantly higher than in controls. The preoperative EGF and E-cad levels were significantly higher than postoperative levels. There was no correlation between EGF, EGFR, and E-cad levels and serum CEA or tumor Ki-67 scores. The serum EGF level was significantly higher in high TNM stage, with lymph node involvement patients than in low TNM stage, no lymph node involvement patients. Serum EGF and EGFR are potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and screening of gastrointestinal cancers. Inter-combination analysis of three biomarkers has improved the performance of the assays.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100555,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 135-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.flm.2017.08.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542364917300894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of cancers are still unsatisfactory in clinical management. The seeking of new biomarkers with better performance is still a challenge. EGF, EGFR, and E-cad are soluble biomarkers with clinical potential. ELISA was used to analyze serum EGF, EGFR, and E-cad from 58 gastrointestinal cancer patients and 20 control subjects. Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze Ki-67 expression in tumors. The results were correlated with clinical features. This study found that the preoperative and postoperative serum EGF and EGFR levels were significantly higher than in controls. The preoperative EGF and E-cad levels were significantly higher than postoperative levels. There was no correlation between EGF, EGFR, and E-cad levels and serum CEA or tumor Ki-67 scores. The serum EGF level was significantly higher in high TNM stage, with lymph node involvement patients than in low TNM stage, no lymph node involvement patients. Serum EGF and EGFR are potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and screening of gastrointestinal cancers. Inter-combination analysis of three biomarkers has improved the performance of the assays.

EGF、EGFR和E-钙粘蛋白作为胃肠道癌症潜在生物标志物的评估
用于癌症早期诊断和预后评估的生物标志物在临床管理中仍然不令人满意。寻找性能更好的新生物标志物仍然是一个挑战。EGF、EGFR和E-cad是具有临床潜力的可溶性生物标志物。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)对58例癌症患者和20例对照者的血清EGF、EGFR和E-cad进行分析。免疫组织化学方法分析Ki-67在肿瘤中的表达。结果与临床特征相关。本研究发现,术前和术后血清EGF和EGFR水平显著高于对照组。术前EGF和E-cad水平明显高于术后。EGF、EGFR和E-cad水平与血清CEA或肿瘤Ki-67评分之间没有相关性。有淋巴结转移的高TNM期患者血清EGF水平显著高于无淋巴结转移、低TNM期的患者。血清EGF和EGFR是诊断和筛查胃肠道癌症的潜在生物标志物。三种生物标志物的相互组合分析提高了测定的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信