Implantation et évaluation d’un programme d’entraînement aux habiletés sociales chez les enfants ayant un trouble du déficit de l’attention avec hyperactivité

Claudia Verret , Line Massé , Jeanne Lagacé-Leblanc
{"title":"Implantation et évaluation d’un programme d’entraînement aux habiletés sociales chez les enfants ayant un trouble du déficit de l’attention avec hyperactivité","authors":"Claudia Verret ,&nbsp;Line Massé ,&nbsp;Jeanne Lagacé-Leblanc","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcc.2018.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Les enfants ayant un trouble du déficit de l’attention avec hyperactivité (TDAH) peuvent vivre des difficultés sociales qui conduisent à des effets négatifs à court et à long terme. L’objectif de cette étude est de mesurer les effets du programme d’entraînement aux habiletés sociales Multi-Propulsion, volet mieux vivre avec les autres (Massé et Verret, 2016 ; Verret et Massé, 2017), chez des enfants ayant un TDAH et d’évaluer l’association entres les habiletés sociales et les difficultés de comportements et des mesures de fidélité de l’implantation. Les participants sont 33 enfants ayant un TDAH âgés de 8 à 12 ans répartis dans un groupe expérimental (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->22) et un groupe en attente (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->11). Le programme étudié inclut 12 ateliers pour les enfants et deux ateliers pour les parents. Les mesures comprennent une évaluation des effets (<em>Social Skills Improvement System</em><sup>TM</sup>) et des indices de fidélité de l’intervention (index d’intégrité, taux de participation, dosage et perceptions de l’adhésion au traitement). Les résultats montrent une amélioration des problèmes de comportements dans le groupe expérimental. L’adhésion au traitement est corrélée avec l’amélioration des habiletés sociales et avec la diminution des problèmes de comportements. L’impact social est généralement significatif. Les améliorations observées sont liées aux contenus abordés dans les ateliers choisis par chacun des groupes, soulignant l’importance d’adapter les programmes aux besoins spécifiques des participants.</p></div><div><p>Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) can experience significant social difficulties that have negative effects in their short- and long-term adjustment (McQuade &amp; Hoza, 2015). The effectiveness of social skills training programs is yet to be demonstrated for ADHD children for whom the generalization and transfer of skills seem limited (Mikami, 2015). The goal of this evaluative research is to measure the effects of a training program entitled Multi-Propulsions (Massé et Verret, 2016; Verret et Massé, 2017) on the social skills and behavioral problems of children with ADHD. The second objective is to evaluate the association between measures of implementation fidelity and dependent variables. Thirty-three children having ADHD (12 girls and 21 boys) aged 8 to 12 years old (Mean 10.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.7 years old) participated in a social skills training program in three different settings (community, school and clinical). The experimental group included 22 children (8 girls and 14 boys) while the waiting list group included 11 children (4 girls and 7 boys). The families were choosing the skills to work. The weekly program included 12 workshops for children and two workshops for parents. The effects on social skills and behavioral problems were assessed using the Social Skills Improvement System™. Fidelity of the intervention was measured using the index of integrity, participation rate, and dosage and perception of adherence to the intervention of children, parents and stakeholders. Social impact was calculated with the occurrence of children classified within the clinical threshold according to SSIS<sup>TM</sup> standards, and was compared before and after the intervention. In addition, percentage of change was calculated for social skills and behavioral difficulties and compared according to each of the environments. The results of the ANCOVA show an improvement in the behavioral problems of the experimental group at the end of the intervention (<em>F</em>(1.22)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->4.789, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04). Children of this group showed fewer externalized behaviors (<em>F</em>(1.22)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->8.004, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01), less bullying behaviors (<em>F</em>(1.22)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->6.113, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.021), and less autism spectrum disorder behaviors (<em>F</em>(1.22)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->7.314, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.013) than children in the waiting group. Overall, the quality of the fidelity of the implementation can be qualified as good to excellent (high participation, integrity). The correlation results between stakeholder and parent adherence indicate that a positive association with social skills and a negative association with behavioral problems. The results of the social impact show significant improvements, except for the social skills of school children. The social difficulties or behaviors leading to enrolment in the program as well as the evaluation tool used could explain the lack of significant improvement in social skills. In addition, the conditions of effectiveness of the program, including social validation of skills, selected, adjustment of the learning process in respect of the active nature of children with ADHD, duration of the program, inclusion of parents in the multimodal format, high frequency of feedback allowed in the activities and respect for fidelity of the implementation could explain the significant results. However, there are limits with respect to school stakeholders and the evaluation of instruments used. According to this study, it seems possible to promote the social adaptation of children with ADHD, particular by reducing behavioral problems. This study highlights the importance of providing social skills training programs for children with ADHD who meet the effectiveness conditions recognized in the literature. In addition, it supports the need to document the fidelity of interventions in order to understand the effects of implemented programs. Finally, this study raises potential limitations related to the method of measuring social skills among participants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100746,"journal":{"name":"Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive","volume":"28 3","pages":"Pages 103-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jtcc.2018.06.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1155170418300557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Les enfants ayant un trouble du déficit de l’attention avec hyperactivité (TDAH) peuvent vivre des difficultés sociales qui conduisent à des effets négatifs à court et à long terme. L’objectif de cette étude est de mesurer les effets du programme d’entraînement aux habiletés sociales Multi-Propulsion, volet mieux vivre avec les autres (Massé et Verret, 2016 ; Verret et Massé, 2017), chez des enfants ayant un TDAH et d’évaluer l’association entres les habiletés sociales et les difficultés de comportements et des mesures de fidélité de l’implantation. Les participants sont 33 enfants ayant un TDAH âgés de 8 à 12 ans répartis dans un groupe expérimental (n = 22) et un groupe en attente (n = 11). Le programme étudié inclut 12 ateliers pour les enfants et deux ateliers pour les parents. Les mesures comprennent une évaluation des effets (Social Skills Improvement SystemTM) et des indices de fidélité de l’intervention (index d’intégrité, taux de participation, dosage et perceptions de l’adhésion au traitement). Les résultats montrent une amélioration des problèmes de comportements dans le groupe expérimental. L’adhésion au traitement est corrélée avec l’amélioration des habiletés sociales et avec la diminution des problèmes de comportements. L’impact social est généralement significatif. Les améliorations observées sont liées aux contenus abordés dans les ateliers choisis par chacun des groupes, soulignant l’importance d’adapter les programmes aux besoins spécifiques des participants.

Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) can experience significant social difficulties that have negative effects in their short- and long-term adjustment (McQuade & Hoza, 2015). The effectiveness of social skills training programs is yet to be demonstrated for ADHD children for whom the generalization and transfer of skills seem limited (Mikami, 2015). The goal of this evaluative research is to measure the effects of a training program entitled Multi-Propulsions (Massé et Verret, 2016; Verret et Massé, 2017) on the social skills and behavioral problems of children with ADHD. The second objective is to evaluate the association between measures of implementation fidelity and dependent variables. Thirty-three children having ADHD (12 girls and 21 boys) aged 8 to 12 years old (Mean 10.8 ± 0.7 years old) participated in a social skills training program in three different settings (community, school and clinical). The experimental group included 22 children (8 girls and 14 boys) while the waiting list group included 11 children (4 girls and 7 boys). The families were choosing the skills to work. The weekly program included 12 workshops for children and two workshops for parents. The effects on social skills and behavioral problems were assessed using the Social Skills Improvement System™. Fidelity of the intervention was measured using the index of integrity, participation rate, and dosage and perception of adherence to the intervention of children, parents and stakeholders. Social impact was calculated with the occurrence of children classified within the clinical threshold according to SSISTM standards, and was compared before and after the intervention. In addition, percentage of change was calculated for social skills and behavioral difficulties and compared according to each of the environments. The results of the ANCOVA show an improvement in the behavioral problems of the experimental group at the end of the intervention (F(1.22) = 4.789, P = 0.04). Children of this group showed fewer externalized behaviors (F(1.22) = 8.004, P = 0.01), less bullying behaviors (F(1.22) = 6.113, P = 0.021), and less autism spectrum disorder behaviors (F(1.22) = 7.314, P = 0.013) than children in the waiting group. Overall, the quality of the fidelity of the implementation can be qualified as good to excellent (high participation, integrity). The correlation results between stakeholder and parent adherence indicate that a positive association with social skills and a negative association with behavioral problems. The results of the social impact show significant improvements, except for the social skills of school children. The social difficulties or behaviors leading to enrolment in the program as well as the evaluation tool used could explain the lack of significant improvement in social skills. In addition, the conditions of effectiveness of the program, including social validation of skills, selected, adjustment of the learning process in respect of the active nature of children with ADHD, duration of the program, inclusion of parents in the multimodal format, high frequency of feedback allowed in the activities and respect for fidelity of the implementation could explain the significant results. However, there are limits with respect to school stakeholders and the evaluation of instruments used. According to this study, it seems possible to promote the social adaptation of children with ADHD, particular by reducing behavioral problems. This study highlights the importance of providing social skills training programs for children with ADHD who meet the effectiveness conditions recognized in the literature. In addition, it supports the need to document the fidelity of interventions in order to understand the effects of implemented programs. Finally, this study raises potential limitations related to the method of measuring social skills among participants.

注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童社交技能培训计划的实施和评估
患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童可能会经历社会困难,导致短期和长期的负面影响。本研究的目的是测量多推进社交技能培训计划“与他人生活得更好”部分(Massé和Verret,2016年;Verret and Massé,2017年)对多动症儿童的影响,并评估社交技能与行为困难和植入忠诚度测量之间的关联。参与者是33名8至12岁的多动症儿童,分为实验组(n=22)和等待组(n=11)。该方案包括12个儿童讲习班和2个家长讲习班。措施包括效果评估(社会技能改善系统™)和干预忠诚度指数(完整性指数、参与率、剂量和对治疗依从性的看法)。结果表明,实验组的行为问题有所改善。坚持治疗与提高社交技能和减少行为问题相关。社会影响通常是重大的。观察到的改进与每个小组选择的讲习班所涵盖的内容有关,强调了根据参与者的具体需要调整方案的重要性。注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童可能会经历严重的社会困难,在短期和长期调整中产生负面影响(McQuade&amp;Hoza,2015)。社会技能培训计划的有效性尚未向多动症儿童证明,技能的普及和转让似乎有限(Mikami,2015年)。本评估研究的目的是衡量多推进培训计划(Massé和Verret,2016;Verret and Massé,2017)对多动症儿童社会技能和行为问题的影响。第二个目标是评估实施保真度措施与依赖变量之间的关联。33名8至12岁(平均10.8±0.7岁)患有多动症的儿童(12名女孩和21名男孩)参加了三种不同环境(社区、学校和临床)的社会技能培训计划。实验组包括22名儿童(8名女孩和14名男孩),而候补名单组包括11名儿童(4名女孩和7名男孩)。家庭选择了工作技能。每周方案包括12个儿童讲习班和2个家长讲习班。使用社会技能改进系统评估了对社会技能和行为问题的影响™. 使用儿童、父母和利益相关者的完整性指数、参与率、剂量和对干预依从性的感知来衡量干预的可信度。根据SSISTM标准,通过临床阈值内分类儿童的发生率计算社会影响,并在干预前后进行比较。此外,还计算了社会技能和行为困难的变化百分比,并根据每个环境进行了比较。Ancova的结果显示,在干预结束时,实验组的行为问题有所改善(f(1.22)=4.789,p=0.04)。该组儿童表现出的外部化行为(f(2.22)=8.004,p=1.01),欺凌行为(f(3.22)=6.113,p=1.021),自闭症谱系障碍行为(f等候组。总体而言,执行的可靠性质量可以从良好到优秀(高参与度、诚信)。利益相关者和父母依从性之间的相关性结果表明,与社会技能呈正相关,与行为问题呈负相关。社会影响的结果显示出显著的改善,但学龄儿童的社会技能除外。导致入学的社会困难或行为以及使用的评估工具可以解释社会技能缺乏重大改善。此外,该方案有效性的条件,包括对选定技能的社会验证、根据多动症儿童的积极性质调整学习过程、方案期限、以多模式形式纳入父母、活动中允许的高频率反馈以及尊重执行的忠实性,可以解释重要结果。然而,在学校利益相关者和所用工具评估方面存在限制。 根据这项研究,似乎有可能促进多动症儿童的社会适应,特别是通过减少行为问题。这项研究强调了为符合文献中公认的有效条件的多动症儿童提供社交技能培训计划的重要性。此外,它支持记录干预措施的保真度的必要性,以了解实施计划的效果。最后,这项研究提出了与衡量参与者社交技能的方法相关的潜在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信