Comparison of different methods of analysis of maxillary sinus volume and validation of a new proposal using cone beam computed tomography

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Camila Camarini , Letícia Carvalho Lima Teixeira , Wilton Mitsunari Takeshita , Elen S. Tolentino , Mariliani C. Silva
{"title":"Comparison of different methods of analysis of maxillary sinus volume and validation of a new proposal using cone beam computed tomography","authors":"Camila Camarini ,&nbsp;Letícia Carvalho Lima Teixeira ,&nbsp;Wilton Mitsunari Takeshita ,&nbsp;Elen S. Tolentino ,&nbsp;Mariliani C. Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.jflm.2023.102611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>develop and validate a formula, through a discriminant analysis of sex estimation, evaluating maxillary sinus in cone beam computed tomography scans in a Brazilian population, comparing this formula with two other existing ones.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>190 cone beam CT scans of Brazilian adults were retrospectively evaluated by an independent examiner. Measurements were performed in the right and left MS region: height, width, length, distance between the breasts, distance between infraorbital foramina, and volume in the ITK software. The sample was divided into female and male. T test, ANOVA, Tukey test and the ROC Curve was performed (p &gt; 0,05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>statistically significant differences were found in relation to the maximum height of the MS both right (p = 0,001) and left (p = 0,026) between sexes and the maximum length in the right MS (p = 0,01). Regarding the comparison of MS volume according to the different analysis methods, statistically significant differences were found between sexes for the right MS when using the method by Bangi et al. (p = 0,012) and the volume of the left MS in females (p &lt; 0,001). Comparing the three classification models, statistically significant differences were found between the proposed method and the classification by Bangi et al. (p &lt; 0.007). The ROC curve showed greater accuracy in the classification proposed in this work.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>the new proposed formula obtained better predictions of sexual dimorphism, when compared to classifications already described in the literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X23001294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

develop and validate a formula, through a discriminant analysis of sex estimation, evaluating maxillary sinus in cone beam computed tomography scans in a Brazilian population, comparing this formula with two other existing ones.

Methods

190 cone beam CT scans of Brazilian adults were retrospectively evaluated by an independent examiner. Measurements were performed in the right and left MS region: height, width, length, distance between the breasts, distance between infraorbital foramina, and volume in the ITK software. The sample was divided into female and male. T test, ANOVA, Tukey test and the ROC Curve was performed (p > 0,05).

Results

statistically significant differences were found in relation to the maximum height of the MS both right (p = 0,001) and left (p = 0,026) between sexes and the maximum length in the right MS (p = 0,01). Regarding the comparison of MS volume according to the different analysis methods, statistically significant differences were found between sexes for the right MS when using the method by Bangi et al. (p = 0,012) and the volume of the left MS in females (p < 0,001). Comparing the three classification models, statistically significant differences were found between the proposed method and the classification by Bangi et al. (p < 0.007). The ROC curve showed greater accuracy in the classification proposed in this work.

Conclusion

the new proposed formula obtained better predictions of sexual dimorphism, when compared to classifications already described in the literature.

不同上颌窦体积分析方法的比较以及锥形束计算机断层扫描新方案的验证。
目的:通过性别估计的判别分析,开发并验证一个公式,在巴西人群的锥束计算机断层扫描中评估上颌窦,并将该公式与其他两个现有公式进行比较。方法:由独立检查者对190例巴西成年人的锥束CT扫描进行回顾性评估。在ITK软件中对左右MS区域进行测量:高度、宽度、长度、乳房之间的距离、眶下孔之间的距离和体积。样本分为女性和男性。进行了T检验、方差分析、Tukey检验和ROC曲线(p>0.05)。结果:性别间MS的最大身高(p=0.001)和最大长度(p=0.001。关于根据不同分析方法的MS体积的比较,当使用Bangi等人的方法时,发现右侧MS的性别之间存在统计学上的显著差异。(p=0.012)和女性左侧MS的体积(p结论:与文献中已经描述的分类相比,新提出的公式获得了更好的两性异形预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine publishes topical articles on aspects of forensic and legal medicine. Specifically the Journal supports research that explores the medical principles of care and forensic assessment of individuals, whether adult or child, in contact with the judicial system. It is a fully peer-review hybrid journal with a broad international perspective. The Journal accepts submissions of original research, review articles, and pertinent case studies, editorials, and commentaries in relevant areas of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Context of Practice, and Education and Training. The Journal adheres to strict publication ethical guidelines, and actively supports a culture of inclusive and representative publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信