Accuracy and reproducibility of real and virtual occlusal contact points in implant-supported fixed prostheses.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ana Larisse Carneiro Pereira, Henrique Vieira Melo Segundo, Maria de Fátima Trindade Pinto Campos, Ana Clara Soares Paiva Tôrres, Gustavo Augusto Seabra Barbosa, Adriana da Fonte Porto Porto Carreiro
{"title":"Accuracy and reproducibility of real and virtual occlusal contact points in implant-supported fixed prostheses.","authors":"Ana Larisse Carneiro Pereira, Henrique Vieira Melo Segundo, Maria de Fátima Trindade Pinto Campos, Ana Clara Soares Paiva Tôrres, Gustavo Augusto Seabra Barbosa, Adriana da Fonte Porto Porto Carreiro","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b4626921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of real and virtual occlusal contact points in implant-supported, fixed complete dentures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 19 participants using mandibular interim complete-arch fixed prosthesis supported by 3 or 4 implants as opposed to conventional removable complete dentures. At installation, an examiner installed the prostheses and verified the occlusal contact points through 2 methods: recording the real contact points with carbon paper (RC) followed by occlusal photography and intraoral scanning (VC) to record the virtual contact points to obtain a screen print of the software. Then, the two images were randomized to determine the order to be inserted into Microsoft PowerPoint for blind and paired evaluation. The independent variables consisted of the distribution of occlusal contacts points (qualification through pre-defined scores based on the position of the contact points on the surfaces of the teeth) and the reproducibility of the methods by verifying the number of occlusal points. For this, a descriptive analysis was used to evaluate the distribution of occlusal contacts points and the Wilcoxon test for the reproducibility of the occlusal contact points between the methods (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The methods had 100% and 73.6% real and virtual occlusal contact points, respectively, which is considered clinically excellent. There was no significant difference regarding the reproducibility of the methods by the number of occlusal contact points (RC: x̅13.32; VC: x̅13.68; p&#61;0.715).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of the tested intraoral scanner can be an easy and fast tool for studying and mapping the occlusion, and storing data for future treatment, with the conventional method being the preferred method for performing the occlusal adjustment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b4626921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of real and virtual occlusal contact points in implant-supported, fixed complete dentures.

Materials and methods: The study included 19 participants using mandibular interim complete-arch fixed prosthesis supported by 3 or 4 implants as opposed to conventional removable complete dentures. At installation, an examiner installed the prostheses and verified the occlusal contact points through 2 methods: recording the real contact points with carbon paper (RC) followed by occlusal photography and intraoral scanning (VC) to record the virtual contact points to obtain a screen print of the software. Then, the two images were randomized to determine the order to be inserted into Microsoft PowerPoint for blind and paired evaluation. The independent variables consisted of the distribution of occlusal contacts points (qualification through pre-defined scores based on the position of the contact points on the surfaces of the teeth) and the reproducibility of the methods by verifying the number of occlusal points. For this, a descriptive analysis was used to evaluate the distribution of occlusal contacts points and the Wilcoxon test for the reproducibility of the occlusal contact points between the methods (p<0.05).

Results: The methods had 100% and 73.6% real and virtual occlusal contact points, respectively, which is considered clinically excellent. There was no significant difference regarding the reproducibility of the methods by the number of occlusal contact points (RC: x̅13.32; VC: x̅13.68; p=0.715).

Conclusion: The use of the tested intraoral scanner can be an easy and fast tool for studying and mapping the occlusion, and storing data for future treatment, with the conventional method being the preferred method for performing the occlusal adjustment.

种植体支持的固定假体中真实和虚拟咬合接触点的准确性和再现性。
目的:评价种植体支持、固定全口义齿中真实和虚拟咬合接触点的准确性和再现性。材料和方法:该研究包括19名参与者,他们使用由3或4个植入物支撑的下颌临时全弓固定义齿,而不是传统的可摘全口义齿。安装时,检查人员安装了假肢,并通过两种方法验证咬合接触点:用复写纸(RC)记录真实接触点,然后进行咬合摄影和口内扫描(VC)记录虚拟接触点,以获得软件的丝网印刷。然后,将这两张图像随机分组,以确定插入Microsoft PowerPoint进行盲评估和配对评估的顺序。自变量包括咬合接触点的分布(根据接触点在牙齿表面的位置通过预先定义的分数进行鉴定)和通过验证咬合点数量来验证方法的可重复性。为此,使用描述性分析来评估咬合接触点的分布,并使用Wilcoxon检验来评估两种方法之间咬合接触点再现性(p结果:这两种方法分别有100%和73.6%的真实和虚拟咬合接触点,这被认为是临床上优秀的。咬合接触点的数量对方法的再现性没有显著差异(RC:xõ13.32;VC:xř13.68;p=0.715)绘制咬合图,并存储用于未来治疗的数据,其中传统方法是执行咬合调整的优选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信