Barriers and Facilitators of Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Utilization in South Asian Ethnic Minorities: A META-SYNTHESIS.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1097/HCR.0000000000000822
Shahzad Inayat, K Alix Hayden, Tavis Campbell, Kathryn King Shier
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators of Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Utilization in South Asian Ethnic Minorities: A META-SYNTHESIS.","authors":"Shahzad Inayat, K Alix Hayden, Tavis Campbell, Kathryn King Shier","doi":"10.1097/HCR.0000000000000822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this review was to synthesize literature on the perceptions of South Asian ethnic minorities of the barriers and facilitators to center-based, phase II cardiac rehabilitation (CR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-synthesis approach was used, and findings were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted from database inception dates to July 2022 using the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria were studies that examined the barriers and/or facilitators of structured center-based CR among South Asian adult ethnic minorities. Critical appraisal of the included studies was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were synthesized using a thematic synthesis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 7110 records initially retrieved only nine studies conducted in the United Kingdom or Canada met the inclusion criteria. More barriers than facilitators were studied and reported. Key barriers were the English language difficulty, fatalistic beliefs, previous bad interactions with and negative perception of health care professionals, transportation problems, work schedule conflict, safety issues, and long-distance CR centers. The facilitators included patient-preferred environment, presence of family members during exercise, family and friends support, and encouragement to change lifestyle and enroll in a CR program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review findings revealed that South Asian ethnic minorities encounter various barriers and facilitators to enroll and complete CR. The findings can inform researchers and clinicians in the development of interventions that are tailored to their cultural needs.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The findings can be valuable to health care professionals and policy makers in designing customized CR programs for South Asian minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000822","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this review was to synthesize literature on the perceptions of South Asian ethnic minorities of the barriers and facilitators to center-based, phase II cardiac rehabilitation (CR).

Methods: A meta-synthesis approach was used, and findings were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted from database inception dates to July 2022 using the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria were studies that examined the barriers and/or facilitators of structured center-based CR among South Asian adult ethnic minorities. Critical appraisal of the included studies was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were synthesized using a thematic synthesis approach.

Results: Among the 7110 records initially retrieved only nine studies conducted in the United Kingdom or Canada met the inclusion criteria. More barriers than facilitators were studied and reported. Key barriers were the English language difficulty, fatalistic beliefs, previous bad interactions with and negative perception of health care professionals, transportation problems, work schedule conflict, safety issues, and long-distance CR centers. The facilitators included patient-preferred environment, presence of family members during exercise, family and friends support, and encouragement to change lifestyle and enroll in a CR program.

Conclusion: The review findings revealed that South Asian ethnic minorities encounter various barriers and facilitators to enroll and complete CR. The findings can inform researchers and clinicians in the development of interventions that are tailored to their cultural needs.

Practice implications: The findings can be valuable to health care professionals and policy makers in designing customized CR programs for South Asian minorities.

南亚少数民族以中心为基础的心脏康复利用的障碍和促进因素:一个荟萃分析。
目的:本综述的目的是综合南亚少数民族对基于中心的II期心脏康复(CR)的障碍和促进者的看法的文献。方法:使用荟萃综合方法,并根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南报告研究结果。从数据库创建日期到2022年7月,使用以下数据库进行了全面的文献检索:MEDLINE、EMBASE、APA PsycINFO、Cochrane系统综述数据库、CINAHL、Scopus和Web of Science。纳入标准是研究南亚成年少数民族中基于结构化中心的CR的障碍和/或促进因素。使用混合方法评估工具对纳入的研究进行了批判性评估。研究结果采用专题综合法进行综合。结果:在最初检索到的7110份记录中,只有9项在英国或加拿大进行的研究符合纳入标准。研究和报告的障碍多于促进者。主要障碍是英语障碍、宿命论信念、以前与医疗保健专业人员的不良互动和负面看法、交通问题、工作日程冲突、安全问题和远程CR中心。促进者包括患者喜欢的环境、锻炼时有家人在场、家人和朋友的支持,以及鼓励改变生活方式和参加CR计划。结论:综述结果显示,南亚少数民族在注册和完成CR方面遇到了各种障碍和促进者。研究结果可以为研究人员和临床医生制定适合其文化需求的干预措施提供信息。实践意义:研究结果对医疗保健专业人员和政策制定者为南亚少数民族设计定制的CR计划有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信