Crop Responses to Furrow Diking in North Carolina

William Foote, Russell Nuti, Keith Edmisten, David Jordan, Randy Wells, Loren Fisher
{"title":"Crop Responses to Furrow Diking in North Carolina","authors":"William Foote,&nbsp;Russell Nuti,&nbsp;Keith Edmisten,&nbsp;David Jordan,&nbsp;Randy Wells,&nbsp;Loren Fisher","doi":"10.2134/CM-2014-0008-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Furrow diking is the practice of installing earthen dams to form small basins between crop rows to reduce water runoff and improve water retention. Furrow-diking equipment is operated shortly after planting and has been used extensively in the southern Great Plains. Research evaluating crop response to furrow diking is limited in North Carolina and other southeastern states. Experiments were conducted to determine cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.) and peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.) yields following furrow diking in conventional and strip tillage systems. Corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) response to furrow diking was determined only in conventional tillage systems. In the experiments where tillage was compared, variability in cotton and peanut response to tillage was observed, whereas diking did not affect yield of these crops. In separate experiments with conventional tillage only, peanut and corn yields were not affected by the diking treatment. However, in one experiment conducted at five sites in conventional tillage only, cotton yield increased by 7% when furrow diking was included. Although these results indicate that peanut and corn may be nonresponsive to furrow diking on coarse-textured soils in the coastal plain of North Carolina, additional research is needed to make a concrete assessment of potential of furrow diking on these crops. While variability was noted when comparing experiments, cotton responded favorably to furrow diking.</p>","PeriodicalId":100342,"journal":{"name":"Crop Management","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2134/CM-2014-0008-RS","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/CM-2014-0008-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Furrow diking is the practice of installing earthen dams to form small basins between crop rows to reduce water runoff and improve water retention. Furrow-diking equipment is operated shortly after planting and has been used extensively in the southern Great Plains. Research evaluating crop response to furrow diking is limited in North Carolina and other southeastern states. Experiments were conducted to determine cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yields following furrow diking in conventional and strip tillage systems. Corn (Zea mays L.) response to furrow diking was determined only in conventional tillage systems. In the experiments where tillage was compared, variability in cotton and peanut response to tillage was observed, whereas diking did not affect yield of these crops. In separate experiments with conventional tillage only, peanut and corn yields were not affected by the diking treatment. However, in one experiment conducted at five sites in conventional tillage only, cotton yield increased by 7% when furrow diking was included. Although these results indicate that peanut and corn may be nonresponsive to furrow diking on coarse-textured soils in the coastal plain of North Carolina, additional research is needed to make a concrete assessment of potential of furrow diking on these crops. While variability was noted when comparing experiments, cotton responded favorably to furrow diking.

北卡罗来纳州作物对Furrow Diking的反应
Furrow筑堤是在作物行之间安装土坝形成小流域的做法,以减少径流并提高保水性。Furrow筑堤设备在种植后不久就开始运行,并在南部大平原广泛使用。在北卡罗来纳州和东南部其他州,评估作物对沟堤反应的研究有限。在常规和条带耕作系统中进行了沟堤后棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L.)和花生(Arachis hypogaea L.)产量测定试验。玉米(Zea mays L.)对沟堤的反应仅在传统耕作系统中确定。在对耕作进行比较的实验中,观察到棉花和花生对耕作反应的变化,而围堤并没有影响这些作物的产量。在仅采用常规耕作的单独试验中,花生和玉米产量不受围堤处理的影响。然而,在仅采用常规耕作的五个地点进行的一项试验中,如果包括沟堤,棉花产量增加了7%。尽管这些结果表明,在北卡罗来纳州沿海平原的粗糙质地土壤上,花生和玉米可能对沟堤没有反应,但还需要更多的研究来具体评估这些作物的沟堤潜力。虽然在比较实验时注意到了变异性,但棉花对沟堤的反应良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信