Effects of Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers on Cotton Growth Characteristics

G. Brett Runion, Dexter B. Watts
{"title":"Effects of Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers on Cotton Growth Characteristics","authors":"G. Brett Runion, Dexter B. Watts","doi":"10.2134/CM-2013-0050-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Use of enhanced-efficiency N fertilizers (EENFs) in row crop agriculture has not been well studied despite increasing interest in these N sources to increase crop yield while decreasing N loss. A field study was conducted in Central Alabama from 2009 to 2011 to compare EENFs to standard N sources in a high-residue conservation cotton production system. Nitrogen fertilizers evaluated were: urea; ammonium sulfate; urea-ammonium sulfate; controlled-release, polymer-coated urea (Environmenally Smart Nitrogen, ESN); stabilized urea (SuperU); poultry litter; poultry litter + AgrotainPlus; and an unfertilized control. Detailed plant growth characteristics were determined before defoliation. Generally, standard fertilizers resulted in the largest number of bolls and the highest boll dry weight. ESN tended to perform as well as the standards. Both poultry litter treatments performed poorly during the first year; however, poultry litter + AgrotainPlus was similar to the standards by the third year of study. In this study, the more expensive EENFs produced yields similar to those of standard fertilizers, suggesting that the former may be economically impractical at present. However, EENFs could become viable alternative fertilizer sources given their ability to reduce N loss from agricultural fields via leaching, runoff, and nitrous oxide flux. Additional research is needed on the benefits of EENFs in row-crop production systems.","PeriodicalId":100342,"journal":{"name":"Crop Management","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2134/CM-2013-0050-RS","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/CM-2013-0050-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Use of enhanced-efficiency N fertilizers (EENFs) in row crop agriculture has not been well studied despite increasing interest in these N sources to increase crop yield while decreasing N loss. A field study was conducted in Central Alabama from 2009 to 2011 to compare EENFs to standard N sources in a high-residue conservation cotton production system. Nitrogen fertilizers evaluated were: urea; ammonium sulfate; urea-ammonium sulfate; controlled-release, polymer-coated urea (Environmenally Smart Nitrogen, ESN); stabilized urea (SuperU); poultry litter; poultry litter + AgrotainPlus; and an unfertilized control. Detailed plant growth characteristics were determined before defoliation. Generally, standard fertilizers resulted in the largest number of bolls and the highest boll dry weight. ESN tended to perform as well as the standards. Both poultry litter treatments performed poorly during the first year; however, poultry litter + AgrotainPlus was similar to the standards by the third year of study. In this study, the more expensive EENFs produced yields similar to those of standard fertilizers, suggesting that the former may be economically impractical at present. However, EENFs could become viable alternative fertilizer sources given their ability to reduce N loss from agricultural fields via leaching, runoff, and nitrous oxide flux. Additional research is needed on the benefits of EENFs in row-crop production systems.
增效肥料对棉花生长特性的影响
尽管人们对提高作物产量同时减少氮损失的这些氮源越来越感兴趣,但在行作物农业中使用高效氮肥(EENFs)的研究还不够深入。2009年至2011年,在阿拉巴马州中部进行了一项实地研究,将EENFs与高残留保护棉花生产系统中的标准N源进行了比较。评价的氮肥有:尿素;硫酸铵;尿素硫酸铵;控释聚合物包膜尿素(Environmentally Smart Nitrogen,ESN);稳定尿素(SuperU);家禽粪便;家禽粪便+AgrotainPlus;以及未受精的对照。落叶前确定了详细的植物生长特征。一般来说,标准肥料产生的铃数最多,铃干重最高。ESN的表现往往与标准一样好。第一年,两种家禽粪便处理都表现不佳;然而,在研究的第三年,家禽粪便+AgrotainPlus与标准相似。在这项研究中,更昂贵的EENF产生的产量与标准肥料的产量相似,这表明前者目前在经济上可能不切实际。然而,鉴于EENF能够通过浸出、径流和一氧化二氮通量减少农田中的氮损失,因此它可能成为可行的替代肥料来源。还需要对EENFs在行作物生产系统中的益处进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信