Barley Cultivar Performance Following Canola, Corn, Pea, and Spring Wheat

Patrick M. Carr, Richard D. Horsley, Glenn B. Martin, Martin R. Hochhalter
{"title":"Barley Cultivar Performance Following Canola, Corn, Pea, and Spring Wheat","authors":"Patrick M. Carr,&nbsp;Richard D. Horsley,&nbsp;Glenn B. Martin,&nbsp;Martin R. Hochhalter","doi":"10.2134/CM-2014-0056-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patrick M. Carr,* Richard D. Horsley, Glenn B. Martin, and Martin R. Hochhalter Abstract High-residue farming and crop diversification practices are replacing conventional tillage and crop-fallow in the Great Plains. Our objective was to determine if cultivar ranking changed when six barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars were grown following canola (Brassica napus L.), corn (Zea mays L.), pea (Pisum sativum L. subsp. sativum), and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) from 2010 through 2013 in southwestern North Dakota. An interaction between the previous crop and barley cultivar was detected in 2011 and 2013 for grain yield (P < 0.10). However, one cultivar in 2011 and three cultivars in 2013 produced equal or greater yields than those produced by other cultivars, regardless of previous crop. Grain yield was comparable with or greater following field pea to that following other crops in 2010 and 2012 when a previous crop cultivar interaction did not exist. Interactions between the previous crop and barley cultivar occurred in only 2 of 12 instances for grain quality traits, and even then at least one cultivar was among the top performers consistently after each previous crop treatment. These results suggest that the previous crop is not an important consideration when making barley cultivar recommendations.","PeriodicalId":100342,"journal":{"name":"Crop Management","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2134/CM-2014-0056-RS","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/CM-2014-0056-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patrick M. Carr,* Richard D. Horsley, Glenn B. Martin, and Martin R. Hochhalter Abstract High-residue farming and crop diversification practices are replacing conventional tillage and crop-fallow in the Great Plains. Our objective was to determine if cultivar ranking changed when six barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars were grown following canola (Brassica napus L.), corn (Zea mays L.), pea (Pisum sativum L. subsp. sativum), and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) from 2010 through 2013 in southwestern North Dakota. An interaction between the previous crop and barley cultivar was detected in 2011 and 2013 for grain yield (P < 0.10). However, one cultivar in 2011 and three cultivars in 2013 produced equal or greater yields than those produced by other cultivars, regardless of previous crop. Grain yield was comparable with or greater following field pea to that following other crops in 2010 and 2012 when a previous crop cultivar interaction did not exist. Interactions between the previous crop and barley cultivar occurred in only 2 of 12 instances for grain quality traits, and even then at least one cultivar was among the top performers consistently after each previous crop treatment. These results suggest that the previous crop is not an important consideration when making barley cultivar recommendations.
继油菜、玉米、豌豆和春小麦之后的大麦品种表现
大平原的高残留农业和作物多样化做法正在取代传统的耕作和作物休耕。我们的目的是确定从2010年到2013年,在北达科他州西南部继油菜(Brassica napus L.)、玉米(Zea mays L.)、豌豆(Pisum sativum L.subsp.sativum)和春小麦(Triticum aestivum L.emend.Thell.)之后种植六个大麦(Hordeum vulgare L.)品种时,品种排名是否发生了变化。2011年和2013年,在谷物产量方面检测到前一作物和大麦品种之间的相互作用(P<;0.10)。然而,无论前一作物如何,2011年的一个品种和2013年的三个品种的产量都与其他品种的产量相等或更高。在2010年和2012年,当先前的作物×品种相互作用不存在时,继田豌豆之后的粮食产量与其他作物相当或更高。在12种谷物品质性状中,前一作物和大麦品种之间的相互作用仅发生在2种情况下,即使在那时,至少有一种品种在前一作物处理后始终表现最佳。这些结果表明,在推荐大麦品种时,以前的作物不是一个重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信