Contrast of fine sediment dynamics between shoals and channels in a microtidal estuary with mixed semi-diurnal tides

IF 1.6 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wenping Gong, Jiaxi Wang, Junpeng Zhao, Lianghong Chen, Heng Zhang
{"title":"Contrast of fine sediment dynamics between shoals and channels in a microtidal estuary with mixed semi-diurnal tides","authors":"Wenping Gong,&nbsp;Jiaxi Wang,&nbsp;Junpeng Zhao,&nbsp;Lianghong Chen,&nbsp;Heng Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s44218-023-00018-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Estuaries usually feature complex bathymetries, where shoals and channels are co-existent. Due to the differences in water depth, current, density gradient and therefore stratification, sediment dynamics on the shoal and in the channel demonstrate significant variations. In this study, field measurements were carried out during spring and neap tides in both wet and dry seasons in the Huangmaohai Estuary, a microtidal estuary located in the southwest of the Pearl River Delta. Harmonic analysis was conducted for the timeseries data of current and suspended sediment concentration (SSC) for each deployment. Sediment transport flux was decomposed into an advective component, and tidal pumping fluxes by different tidal constituents. During the neap tides, sediment transport is primarily controlled by the advective flux, whereas during the spring tides, tidal pumping fluxes become comparable to, sometimes even exceeding, the advective one. For a 25-hr period, the M1 component of SSC usually denotes the maximum SSC associated with the highest bottom stress, while the M2 component signifies the two highs of the SSC. The M4 component is generally insignificant. The M1 and M2 components can be induced by both the advection and bottom resuspension. For the resuspension part, the M1 component is mostly induced by tidal velocity asymmetry, while the M2 component is generated by tidal straining effect. Sediment transport at the shoal is mostly controlled by the advective flux and the tidal pumping due to tidal velocity asymmetry, while that in the channel is dictated by advective transport and the tidal pumping due to tidal mixing asymmetry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100098,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Coasts","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Coasts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44218-023-00018-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estuaries usually feature complex bathymetries, where shoals and channels are co-existent. Due to the differences in water depth, current, density gradient and therefore stratification, sediment dynamics on the shoal and in the channel demonstrate significant variations. In this study, field measurements were carried out during spring and neap tides in both wet and dry seasons in the Huangmaohai Estuary, a microtidal estuary located in the southwest of the Pearl River Delta. Harmonic analysis was conducted for the timeseries data of current and suspended sediment concentration (SSC) for each deployment. Sediment transport flux was decomposed into an advective component, and tidal pumping fluxes by different tidal constituents. During the neap tides, sediment transport is primarily controlled by the advective flux, whereas during the spring tides, tidal pumping fluxes become comparable to, sometimes even exceeding, the advective one. For a 25-hr period, the M1 component of SSC usually denotes the maximum SSC associated with the highest bottom stress, while the M2 component signifies the two highs of the SSC. The M4 component is generally insignificant. The M1 and M2 components can be induced by both the advection and bottom resuspension. For the resuspension part, the M1 component is mostly induced by tidal velocity asymmetry, while the M2 component is generated by tidal straining effect. Sediment transport at the shoal is mostly controlled by the advective flux and the tidal pumping due to tidal velocity asymmetry, while that in the channel is dictated by advective transport and the tidal pumping due to tidal mixing asymmetry.

半日潮混合微潮河口浅滩和河道细泥沙动力学对比
河口通常具有复杂的水深,其中浅滩和河道共存。由于水深、水流、密度梯度以及分层的差异,浅滩和航道上的沉积物动力学表现出显著的变化。在本研究中,对位于珠江三角洲西南部的微潮河口黄茅海口在雨季和旱季的大潮和小潮期间进行了现场测量。对每次部署的水流和悬浮泥沙浓度(SSC)的时间序列数据进行谐波分析。泥沙输移通量分解为平流分量和不同潮汐分量的抽潮通量。在小潮期间,沉积物输送主要由平流通量控制,而在大潮期间,潮汐泵送通量与平流通量相当,有时甚至超过平流通量。在25小时内,SSC的M1分量通常表示与最高底部应力相关的最大SSC,而M2分量表示SSC的两个高点。M4组件通常不重要。M1和M2分量可由平流和底部再悬浮引起。对于再悬浮部分,M1分量主要是由潮汐速度不对称引起的,而M2分量是由潮汐应变效应产生的。由于潮流速度不对称,浅滩的泥沙输移主要由平流通量和潮汐泵送控制,而河道的泥沙输运则由平流输移和潮汐混合不对称引起的潮汐泵送决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信