Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 and influenza H1N1 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A comparative cohort study in China

Yonghao Xu , Yin Xi , Shuijiang Cai , Yuheng Yu , Sibei Chen , Weijie Guan , Weibo Liang , Hongkai Wu , Weiqun He , Xilong Deng , Yuanda Xu , Rong Zhang , Manshu Li , Jieyi Pan , Zhenting Liang , Ya Wang , Shaofeng Kong , Xiaoqing Liu , Zheng Lv , Yimin Li
{"title":"Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 and influenza H1N1 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A comparative cohort study in China","authors":"Yonghao Xu ,&nbsp;Yin Xi ,&nbsp;Shuijiang Cai ,&nbsp;Yuheng Yu ,&nbsp;Sibei Chen ,&nbsp;Weijie Guan ,&nbsp;Weibo Liang ,&nbsp;Hongkai Wu ,&nbsp;Weiqun He ,&nbsp;Xilong Deng ,&nbsp;Yuanda Xu ,&nbsp;Rong Zhang ,&nbsp;Manshu Li ,&nbsp;Jieyi Pan ,&nbsp;Zhenting Liang ,&nbsp;Ya Wang ,&nbsp;Shaofeng Kong ,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Liu ,&nbsp;Zheng Lv ,&nbsp;Yimin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) has been demonstrated to be effective in treating patients with virus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, whether the management of ECMO is different in treating H1N1 influenza and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated ARDS patients remains unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective cohort study. We included 12 VV-ECMO-supported COVID-19 patients admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, and Wuhan Union Hospital West Campus between January 23 and March 31, 2020. We retrospectively included VV-ECMO-supported patients with COVID-19 and H1N1 influenza-associated ARDS. Clinical characteristics, respiratory mechanics including plateau pressure, driving pressure, mechanical power, ventilatory ratio (VR) and lung compliance, and outcomes were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from 25 patients with COVID-19 (<em>n</em>=12) and H1N1 (<em>n</em>=13) associated ARDS who had received ECMO support were analyzed. COVID-19 patients were older than H1N1 influenza patients (<em>P</em>=0.004). The partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO<sub>2</sub>) and VR before ECMO initiation were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients than in H1N1 influenza patients (<em>P</em> &lt;0.001 and <em>P</em>=0.004, respectively). COVID-19 patients showed increased plateau and driving pressure compared with H1N1 subjects (<em>P</em>=0.013 and <em>P</em>=0.018, respectively). Patients with COVID-19 remained longer on ECMO support than did H1N1 influenza patients (<em>P</em>=0.015). COVID-19 patients who required ECMO support also had fewer intensive care unit and ventilator-free days than H1N1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Compared with H1N1 influenza patients, COVID-19 patients were older and presented with increased PaCO<sub>2</sub> and VR values before ECMO initiation. The differences between ARDS patients with COVID-19 and influenza on VV-ECMO detailed herein could be helpful for obtaining a better understanding of COVID-19 and for better clinical management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X23000518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) has been demonstrated to be effective in treating patients with virus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, whether the management of ECMO is different in treating H1N1 influenza and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated ARDS patients remains unknown.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study. We included 12 VV-ECMO-supported COVID-19 patients admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, and Wuhan Union Hospital West Campus between January 23 and March 31, 2020. We retrospectively included VV-ECMO-supported patients with COVID-19 and H1N1 influenza-associated ARDS. Clinical characteristics, respiratory mechanics including plateau pressure, driving pressure, mechanical power, ventilatory ratio (VR) and lung compliance, and outcomes were compared.

Results

Data from 25 patients with COVID-19 (n=12) and H1N1 (n=13) associated ARDS who had received ECMO support were analyzed. COVID-19 patients were older than H1N1 influenza patients (P=0.004). The partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and VR before ECMO initiation were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients than in H1N1 influenza patients (P <0.001 and P=0.004, respectively). COVID-19 patients showed increased plateau and driving pressure compared with H1N1 subjects (P=0.013 and P=0.018, respectively). Patients with COVID-19 remained longer on ECMO support than did H1N1 influenza patients (P=0.015). COVID-19 patients who required ECMO support also had fewer intensive care unit and ventilator-free days than H1N1.

Conclusions

Compared with H1N1 influenza patients, COVID-19 patients were older and presented with increased PaCO2 and VR values before ECMO initiation. The differences between ARDS patients with COVID-19 and influenza on VV-ECMO detailed herein could be helpful for obtaining a better understanding of COVID-19 and for better clinical management.

静脉-静脉体外膜氧合治疗COVID-19和甲型H1N1流感相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征:中国的一项比较队列研究
背景静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV-ECMO)已被证明可有效治疗病毒诱导的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者。然而,ECMO的管理在治疗H1N1流感和2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)相关ARDS患者方面是否有所不同仍然未知。方法本研究为回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了2020年1月23日至3月31日期间广州医科大学第一附属医院、广州市第八人民医院和武汉协和医院西校区收治的12名VV-ECMO支持的新冠肺炎患者。我们回顾性纳入了VV-ECMO支持的新冠肺炎和H1N1流感相关ARDS患者。比较临床特征、呼吸力学(包括平台压力、驱动压力、机械功率、通气率(VR)和肺顺应性)和结果。结果对25例接受ECMO支持的新冠肺炎(n=12)和H1N1(n=13)相关ARDS患者的数据进行分析。新冠肺炎患者的年龄大于H1N1流感患者(P=0.004)。在开始ECMO之前,新冠肺炎患者的动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)和VR显著高于H1N1流感患者的分压(分别为P<0.001和P=0.004)。与H1N1受试者相比,新冠肺炎患者表现出高原和驾驶压力增加(分别为P=0.013和P=0.018)。新冠肺炎患者接受ECMO支持的时间比H1N1流感患者长(P=0.015)。需要ECMO支持支持的新冠肺炎患者的重症监护室和无呼吸机天数也比H1N1。本文详述的新冠肺炎ARDS患者与VV-ECMO上的流感患者之间的差异可能有助于更好地了解新冠肺炎和更好的临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信