Dynamic regime differences in the market behavior of primary natural resources in response to geopolitical risk and economic policy uncertainty

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Erhan Muğaloğlu , Sevda Kuşkaya , Luigi Aldieri , Mohammed Alnour , Mohammad Enamul Hoque , Cosimo Magazzino , Faik Bilgili
{"title":"Dynamic regime differences in the market behavior of primary natural resources in response to geopolitical risk and economic policy uncertainty","authors":"Erhan Muğaloğlu ,&nbsp;Sevda Kuşkaya ,&nbsp;Luigi Aldieri ,&nbsp;Mohammed Alnour ,&nbsp;Mohammad Enamul Hoque ,&nbsp;Cosimo Magazzino ,&nbsp;Faik Bilgili","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study explores the dynamic effects of geopolitical risks and economic policy uncertainties on oil and natural gas prices in the US market's less volatile and highly volatile regimes, employing Markov regime-switching dynamic regression models (MS-DR) with monthly data from January 2000 to November 2022. Our empirical results demonstrate that a positive shock in the geopolitical risk of the USA (GPR_US) causes an increase in the growth rate of the prices of WTI at the high volatile periods (regime 1), and its one-period lagged effects are negative at time t in the less volatile periods (regime 0), and it cumulatively causes an increase in WTI price. GPR_US and one lagged effect negatively and positively natural gas prices (NGAS) at both regimes. respectively, where the dynamic cumulative impact of GPR_US causes NGAS to increase. World geopolitical risks (GPR) lead to an increase in WTI and natural gas prices. Furthermore, US economic policy exerts a reduction in WTI price at both less and highly volatile regimes, and its lag influences are positive at both regimes, where it cumulatively causes a decrease in WTI price. In a similar manner, global economic policy uncertainty also reduces WTI. US economic policy and its lag effects exhibit an increase and decrease in NGAS prices in the high volatile regime but exhibited a cumulatively positive response to shock in economic policy uncertainty. Global economic policy uncertainty causes nature gas prices to go up. Hence, geopolitical risks and economic policy uncertainty might have a complex impact on the prices of natural resources. It depends on the specific circumstances and the supply-demand dynamics in the market. Our findings offer insightful implications for economic agents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 104340"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723010516","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study explores the dynamic effects of geopolitical risks and economic policy uncertainties on oil and natural gas prices in the US market's less volatile and highly volatile regimes, employing Markov regime-switching dynamic regression models (MS-DR) with monthly data from January 2000 to November 2022. Our empirical results demonstrate that a positive shock in the geopolitical risk of the USA (GPR_US) causes an increase in the growth rate of the prices of WTI at the high volatile periods (regime 1), and its one-period lagged effects are negative at time t in the less volatile periods (regime 0), and it cumulatively causes an increase in WTI price. GPR_US and one lagged effect negatively and positively natural gas prices (NGAS) at both regimes. respectively, where the dynamic cumulative impact of GPR_US causes NGAS to increase. World geopolitical risks (GPR) lead to an increase in WTI and natural gas prices. Furthermore, US economic policy exerts a reduction in WTI price at both less and highly volatile regimes, and its lag influences are positive at both regimes, where it cumulatively causes a decrease in WTI price. In a similar manner, global economic policy uncertainty also reduces WTI. US economic policy and its lag effects exhibit an increase and decrease in NGAS prices in the high volatile regime but exhibited a cumulatively positive response to shock in economic policy uncertainty. Global economic policy uncertainty causes nature gas prices to go up. Hence, geopolitical risks and economic policy uncertainty might have a complex impact on the prices of natural resources. It depends on the specific circumstances and the supply-demand dynamics in the market. Our findings offer insightful implications for economic agents.

地缘政治风险和经济政策不确定性下初级自然资源市场行为的动态机制差异
该研究采用马尔可夫制度切换动态回归模型(MS-DR),结合2000年1月至2022年11月的月度数据,探讨了地缘政治风险和经济政策不确定性对美国市场波动较小和高度波动制度下石油和天然气价格的动态影响。我们的实证结果表明,美国地缘政治风险的正冲击(GPR_US)导致WTI价格在高波动期(制度1)的增长率增加,而在波动较小的时期(制度0),其一个时期的滞后效应在时间t为负,并累积导致WTI价格增加。GPR_US和一个滞后对两种制度下的天然气价格(NGAS)产生了正负影响。其中GPR_US的动态累积影响导致NGAS增加。世界地缘政治风险导致WTI和天然气价格上涨。此外,美国经济政策在波动较小和高度波动的制度下都会降低WTI价格,其滞后影响在这两种制度下都是积极的,累积导致WTI价格下降。同样,全球经济政策的不确定性也降低了WTI。美国经济政策及其滞后效应表明,在高度动荡的体制下,天然气价格有升有降,但对经济政策不确定性的冲击表现出累积的积极反应。全球经济政策的不确定性导致天然气价格上涨。因此,地缘政治风险和经济政策的不确定性可能对自然资源价格产生复杂影响。这取决于具体情况和市场供求动态。我们的发现为经济主体提供了深刻的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信