Comparison of quantification methods for an endoscope lumen biofilm model

IF 5.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Bruno Haas , Sarah James , Albert E. Parker , Marie-Claude Gagnon , Noémie Goulet , Philippe Labrie
{"title":"Comparison of quantification methods for an endoscope lumen biofilm model","authors":"Bruno Haas ,&nbsp;Sarah James ,&nbsp;Albert E. Parker ,&nbsp;Marie-Claude Gagnon ,&nbsp;Noémie Goulet ,&nbsp;Philippe Labrie","doi":"10.1016/j.bioflm.2023.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biofilm has been implicated in multi-drug resistant organism outbreaks following endoscopic procedures. Automated Endoscope Reprocessors (AER) are devices validated to clean and disinfect endoscopes per applicable standards. The ISO 15883 part 4 standard guides performance testing validation of AERs, including cleaning performance using a biofilm test soil. The standard recommends assessment of biofilm reduction using protein or carbohydrate quantification methods. The aim of this study was to assess the suitability of various quantification methods using the ISO biofilm model.</p><p>The ISO 15883 part 5 biofilm test soil method was used to grow biofilm within lumens representative of endoscopes channels. The biofilm was then quantified using five methods: Crystal Violet (CV), Colony Forming Units (CFU), Total Organic Carbon (TOC), protein assay with Orthophtalaldehyde (OPA), and protein assay by micro bicinchoninic acid (μBCA). The five methods were statistically analyzed for their ability to assess biofilm reduction on samples accurately and precisely. In addition, the quantification methods were compared to demonstrate statistical equivalency, and thus their suitability for assessing biofilm cleaning performance testing of AERs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55844,"journal":{"name":"Biofilm","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofilm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207523000606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biofilm has been implicated in multi-drug resistant organism outbreaks following endoscopic procedures. Automated Endoscope Reprocessors (AER) are devices validated to clean and disinfect endoscopes per applicable standards. The ISO 15883 part 4 standard guides performance testing validation of AERs, including cleaning performance using a biofilm test soil. The standard recommends assessment of biofilm reduction using protein or carbohydrate quantification methods. The aim of this study was to assess the suitability of various quantification methods using the ISO biofilm model.

The ISO 15883 part 5 biofilm test soil method was used to grow biofilm within lumens representative of endoscopes channels. The biofilm was then quantified using five methods: Crystal Violet (CV), Colony Forming Units (CFU), Total Organic Carbon (TOC), protein assay with Orthophtalaldehyde (OPA), and protein assay by micro bicinchoninic acid (μBCA). The five methods were statistically analyzed for their ability to assess biofilm reduction on samples accurately and precisely. In addition, the quantification methods were compared to demonstrate statistical equivalency, and thus their suitability for assessing biofilm cleaning performance testing of AERs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

内窥镜管腔生物膜模型定量方法的比较。
生物膜与内镜手术后多药耐药生物体的爆发有关。自动内窥镜再处理器(AER)是根据适用标准对内窥镜进行清洁和消毒的设备。ISO 15883第4部分标准指导AERs的性能测试验证,包括使用生物膜测试土壤的清洁性能。该标准建议使用蛋白质或碳水化合物定量方法评估生物膜减少情况。本研究的目的是使用ISO生物膜模型评估各种定量方法的适用性。ISO 15883第5部分生物膜试验土壤法用于在代表内窥镜通道的管腔内生长生物膜。然后使用五种方法对生物膜进行定量:结晶紫(CV)、菌落形成单位(CFU)、总有机碳(TOC)、用正戊醛(OPA)进行的蛋白质测定和用微量二辛可宁酸(μBCA)进行蛋白质测定。对这五种方法进行了统计分析,以确定其准确、准确地评估样本生物膜减少情况的能力。此外,对量化方法进行了比较,以证明其统计等效性,从而证明其适用于评估AERs的生物膜清洁性能测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biofilm
Biofilm MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
1.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信