[Reproducibilidad clínica de reacciones de hipersensibilidad a fármacos en pruebas de exposición controlada].

A Alberto Palacios Cañas, Jaime Vinicio Meneses Sotomayor, Míriam Clar Castelló, Elisa Gómez Torrijos, Jesus María Borja Segade, Rosa García Rodríguez
{"title":"[Reproducibilidad clínica de reacciones de hipersensibilidad a fármacos en pruebas de exposición controlada].","authors":"A Alberto Palacios Cañas, Jaime Vinicio Meneses Sotomayor, Míriam Clar Castelló, Elisa Gómez Torrijos, Jesus María Borja Segade, Rosa García Rodríguez","doi":"10.29262/ram.v70i3.1199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the reproducibility of symptoms in drug challenge tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included patients with positive cutaneous or challenge test throughout 2019. For each patient, clinical suspicion according to Karch-Lasagna algorithm was registered. Primary outcome was the reproducibility of symptoms in the provocation tests using a paired analysis of data with McNemar test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-nine patients were included, 16 of them presented more than one positive test. Thirty were skin tests positive and 75 reacted to provocation tests. Eighty nine percent of patients who reacted in challenge test were probably or possibly reactors according to Karch-Lasagna scale. Symptoms of initial reaction did not differ from those triggered in challenge tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Karch-Lasagna scale is useful in predicting the response to drug provocation tests. In most of the positive studies, results were suggested by clinical history and no differences were found between symptoms triggered in challenge test and that referred to in the previous reaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":101421,"journal":{"name":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v70i3.1199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the reproducibility of symptoms in drug challenge tests.

Methods: The study included patients with positive cutaneous or challenge test throughout 2019. For each patient, clinical suspicion according to Karch-Lasagna algorithm was registered. Primary outcome was the reproducibility of symptoms in the provocation tests using a paired analysis of data with McNemar test.

Results: Eighty-nine patients were included, 16 of them presented more than one positive test. Thirty were skin tests positive and 75 reacted to provocation tests. Eighty nine percent of patients who reacted in challenge test were probably or possibly reactors according to Karch-Lasagna scale. Symptoms of initial reaction did not differ from those triggered in challenge tests.

Conclusions: Karch-Lasagna scale is useful in predicting the response to drug provocation tests. In most of the positive studies, results were suggested by clinical history and no differences were found between symptoms triggered in challenge test and that referred to in the previous reaction.

[控制暴露试验中药物过敏反应的临床再现性]。
目的:评估药物激发试验中症状的再现性。方法:该研究纳入了2019年全年皮肤或激发试验呈阳性的患者。对于每一位患者,根据Karch Lasagna算法进行临床怀疑登记。主要结果是使用McNemar试验对数据进行配对分析的激发试验中症状的再现性。结果:89名患者被包括在内,其中16人的检测结果呈阳性。30人的皮肤测试呈阳性,75人对刺激测试有反应。根据Karch Lasagna量表,在激发试验中有反应的患者中,89%可能是或可能是反应者。最初反应的症状与激发试验中引发的症状没有区别。结论:卡氏Lasagna量表可用于预测药物激发试验的反应。在大多数阳性研究中,结果是由临床病史提示的,在激发试验中引发的症状和先前反应中提到的症状之间没有发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信