Different Sources of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Comparison of Subchondral, Mandibular, and Tibia Bone-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Yu Wang, Hong-Yu Li, Shu-Yuan Guan, Si-Han Yu, Ya-Chuan Zhou, Li-Wei Zheng, Jun Zhang
{"title":"Different Sources of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Comparison of Subchondral, Mandibular, and Tibia Bone-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.","authors":"Yu Wang, Hong-Yu Li, Shu-Yuan Guan, Si-Han Yu, Ya-Chuan Zhou, Li-Wei Zheng, Jun Zhang","doi":"10.2174/011574888X260686231023091127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stem cell properties vary considerably based on the source and tissue site of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The mandibular condyle is a unique kind of craniofacial bone with a special structure and a relatively high remodeling rate. MSCs here may also be unique to address specific physical needs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the proliferation and multidirectional differentiation potential among MSCs derived from the tibia (TMSCs), mandibular ramus marrow (MMSCs), and condylar subchondral bone (SMSCs) of rats <i>in vitro</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cell proliferation and migration were assessed by CCK-8, laser confocal, and cell scratch assays. Histochemical staining and real-time PCR were used to evaluate the multidirectional differentiation potential and DNA methylation and histone deacetylation levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proliferation rate and self-renewal capacity of SMSCs were significantly higher than those of MMSCs and TMSCs. Moreover, SMSCs possessed significantly higher mineralization and osteogenic differentiation potential. <i>Dnmt2, Dnmt3b, Hdac6, Hdac7, Hdac9,</i> and <i>Hdac10</i> may be instrumental in the osteogenesis of SMSCs. In addition, SMSCs are distinct from MMSCs and TMSCs with lower adipogenic differentiation and chondrogenic differentiation potential. The multidirectional differentiation capacities of TMSCs were exactly the opposite of those of SMSCs, and the results of MMSCs were intermediate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research offers a new paradigm in which SMSCs could be a useful source of stem cells for further application in stem cell-based medical therapies due to their strong cell renewal and osteogenic capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":93971,"journal":{"name":"Current stem cell research & therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1029-1041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current stem cell research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011574888X260686231023091127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stem cell properties vary considerably based on the source and tissue site of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The mandibular condyle is a unique kind of craniofacial bone with a special structure and a relatively high remodeling rate. MSCs here may also be unique to address specific physical needs.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the proliferation and multidirectional differentiation potential among MSCs derived from the tibia (TMSCs), mandibular ramus marrow (MMSCs), and condylar subchondral bone (SMSCs) of rats in vitro.

Methods: Cell proliferation and migration were assessed by CCK-8, laser confocal, and cell scratch assays. Histochemical staining and real-time PCR were used to evaluate the multidirectional differentiation potential and DNA methylation and histone deacetylation levels.

Results: The proliferation rate and self-renewal capacity of SMSCs were significantly higher than those of MMSCs and TMSCs. Moreover, SMSCs possessed significantly higher mineralization and osteogenic differentiation potential. Dnmt2, Dnmt3b, Hdac6, Hdac7, Hdac9, and Hdac10 may be instrumental in the osteogenesis of SMSCs. In addition, SMSCs are distinct from MMSCs and TMSCs with lower adipogenic differentiation and chondrogenic differentiation potential. The multidirectional differentiation capacities of TMSCs were exactly the opposite of those of SMSCs, and the results of MMSCs were intermediate.

Conclusion: This research offers a new paradigm in which SMSCs could be a useful source of stem cells for further application in stem cell-based medical therapies due to their strong cell renewal and osteogenic capacity.

骨髓间充质干细胞的不同来源:软骨下、下颌骨和胫骨来源的间充质细胞的比较。
背景:间充质干细胞(MSCs)的来源和组织部位不同,干细胞的特性也有很大差异。下颌骨髁突是一种独特的颅面骨,具有特殊的结构和较高的重建率。这里的MSC也可能是唯一的,以满足特定的物理需求。目的:比较大鼠胫骨(TMSCs)、下颌支骨髓(MMSCs)和髁突软骨下骨(SMSCs)间充质干细胞在体外的增殖和多向分化潜能。方法:采用CCK-8、激光共聚焦和细胞划痕法检测细胞增殖和迁移。组织化学染色和实时PCR用于评估多向分化潜力以及DNA甲基化和组蛋白脱乙酰化水平。结果:SMSC的增殖率和自我更新能力明显高于MMSC和TMSCs。此外,SMSC具有显著更高的矿化和成骨分化潜力。Dnmt2、Dnmt3b、Hdac6、Hdac7、Hdac9和Hdac10可能有助于SMSC的成骨。此外,SMSC不同于MMSC和TMSCs,具有较低的脂肪分化和软骨分化潜力。TMSCs的多向分化能力与SMSC完全相反,MMSC的结果中等。结论:本研究提供了一种新的范式,其中SMSCs由于其强大的细胞更新和成骨能力,可以作为干细胞的有用来源,进一步应用于基于干细胞的医学治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信