Ilham Boulhissa, Hanane Boucherit, Abdelouahab Chikhi, Abderrahmane Bensegueni
{"title":"Docking of T6361 Analogues as Potential Inhibitors of <i>E.coli</i> MurA Followed by ADME-Toxicity Study.","authors":"Ilham Boulhissa, Hanane Boucherit, Abdelouahab Chikhi, Abderrahmane Bensegueni","doi":"10.2174/0115701638244582231025110143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developing more potent antibacterial agents is one of the most important tasks of scientists in the health field due to the problem of antibiotic resistance. Among the antibiotic targets, we mention MurA (UDP-N-Acetylglucosamine Enolpyruvyl Transferase), which is a key enzyme of peptidoglycan biosynthesis of the bacterial cell wall.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to search for new inhibitors of the bacterial enzyme MurA by docking the analogues of its inhibitor T6361, a derivative of 5-sulfonoxy-anthranilic acid.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>990 analogues of T6361 were docked in the first binding site of <i>E.coli</i> MurA (open form) using the FlexX program, and the ADME-Toxicity profile of the best ones was evaluated by SwissADME and PreADMET web servers. .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Docking results revealed two T6361 analogues to provide better energy scores than T6361, and have similar interactions with the binding site of E.coli MurA namely,3-{[2-(piperidine-1-carbonyl) phenyl]sulfamoyl}benzoic acid and 3-{[2-(pyrrolidine-1 carbonyl)phenyl]sulfamoyl}benzoic acid. Moreover, the two molecules were found to possess good pharmacokinetics and low toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We propose two analogues of T6361 as new potential inhibitors of MurA enzyme. Their good ADME-Toxicity profile qualifies them to reach <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> assays as future lead molecules.</p>","PeriodicalId":93962,"journal":{"name":"Current drug discovery technologies","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug discovery technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701638244582231025110143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Developing more potent antibacterial agents is one of the most important tasks of scientists in the health field due to the problem of antibiotic resistance. Among the antibiotic targets, we mention MurA (UDP-N-Acetylglucosamine Enolpyruvyl Transferase), which is a key enzyme of peptidoglycan biosynthesis of the bacterial cell wall.
Objective: Our objective was to search for new inhibitors of the bacterial enzyme MurA by docking the analogues of its inhibitor T6361, a derivative of 5-sulfonoxy-anthranilic acid.
Methods: 990 analogues of T6361 were docked in the first binding site of E.coli MurA (open form) using the FlexX program, and the ADME-Toxicity profile of the best ones was evaluated by SwissADME and PreADMET web servers. .
Results: Docking results revealed two T6361 analogues to provide better energy scores than T6361, and have similar interactions with the binding site of E.coli MurA namely,3-{[2-(piperidine-1-carbonyl) phenyl]sulfamoyl}benzoic acid and 3-{[2-(pyrrolidine-1 carbonyl)phenyl]sulfamoyl}benzoic acid. Moreover, the two molecules were found to possess good pharmacokinetics and low toxicity.
Conclusion: We propose two analogues of T6361 as new potential inhibitors of MurA enzyme. Their good ADME-Toxicity profile qualifies them to reach in vitro and in vivo assays as future lead molecules.