Components of navigation ability and their predictors in a community-dwelling sample of older adults.

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in aging Pub Date : 2023-10-19 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fragi.2023.1239094
Michael J Prevratil, Dorota Kossowska-Kuhn, Nicholas Gray, Neil Charness
{"title":"Components of navigation ability and their predictors in a community-dwelling sample of older adults.","authors":"Michael J Prevratil,&nbsp;Dorota Kossowska-Kuhn,&nbsp;Nicholas Gray,&nbsp;Neil Charness","doi":"10.3389/fragi.2023.1239094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Navigation, as a complex skill important for independent living, requires a variety of cognitive processes. Current scales tapping components are lengthy and can be burdensome for older adults. <b>Methods:</b> Community-dwelling older adults (<i>n</i> = 380, age 60-90 years) completed an online survey tapping wayfinding, being lost navigating, and needing help navigating. Participants then completed objective measures of navigation ability and self-reported memory ability. Cronbach's <i>α</i> was calculated for navigation subscales consisting of subsets of the Wayfinding Questionnaire and Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Questionnaire, and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted. Regression analyses were used to test whether objective navigation, memory, and demographic information navigation predicted navigation subscale performance. <b>Results:</b> Each of the individual subscales demonstrated high reliability. EFA generated five unique factors: routing, mental mapping, navigation in near vicinities, feeling lost in far vicinities, and needing help in far vicinities. Across regression analyses, memory, gender, and performance on the Spatial Orientation Test were significant predictors. <b>Discussion:</b> Navigation is a multi-faceted construct that can be reliably measured using concise surveys. Further research is necessary to understand the intricacies of aging and navigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73061,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2023.1239094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Navigation, as a complex skill important for independent living, requires a variety of cognitive processes. Current scales tapping components are lengthy and can be burdensome for older adults. Methods: Community-dwelling older adults (n = 380, age 60-90 years) completed an online survey tapping wayfinding, being lost navigating, and needing help navigating. Participants then completed objective measures of navigation ability and self-reported memory ability. Cronbach's α was calculated for navigation subscales consisting of subsets of the Wayfinding Questionnaire and Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Questionnaire, and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted. Regression analyses were used to test whether objective navigation, memory, and demographic information navigation predicted navigation subscale performance. Results: Each of the individual subscales demonstrated high reliability. EFA generated five unique factors: routing, mental mapping, navigation in near vicinities, feeling lost in far vicinities, and needing help in far vicinities. Across regression analyses, memory, gender, and performance on the Spatial Orientation Test were significant predictors. Discussion: Navigation is a multi-faceted construct that can be reliably measured using concise surveys. Further research is necessary to understand the intricacies of aging and navigation.

Abstract Image

社区老年人样本中导航能力的组成部分及其预测因素。
导读:导航作为一项对独立生活很重要的复杂技能,需要多种认知过程。目前的天平敲击部件很长,对老年人来说可能是负担。方法:居住在社区的老年人(n=380,年龄60-90岁)完成了一项在线调查,了解寻路、迷路和需要帮助导航。然后,参与者完成了导航能力和自我报告记忆能力的客观测量。计算导航分量表的Cronbachα,该分量表由寻路问卷和圣巴巴拉方向感问卷的子集组成,并进行探索性因素分析(EFA)。回归分析用于测试客观导航、记忆和人口统计信息导航是否预测导航分量表表现。结果:每个分量表都显示出很高的可靠性。EFA产生了五个独特的因素:路线、心理地图、近距离导航、远距离迷路和远距离需要帮助。在回归分析中,记忆、性别和空间定向测试的表现是重要的预测因素。讨论:导航是一个多方面的结构,可以使用简洁的调查进行可靠的测量。有必要进行进一步的研究,以了解衰老和航海的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信