{"title":"Change in auditory and visuospatial working memory with phases of menstrual cycle: A prospective study of three consecutive cycles.","authors":"Kajol Kumari Tulsyan, Soumen Manna, Himani Ahluwalia","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2023.2279210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The menstrual cycle is a well-known physiological model used to study working memory (WM) function. The present study examined auditory and visuospatial WM during proliferative and secretory phases of three consecutive menstrual cycles.Forty young adult females with a mean age of 23.4 ± 4.2 years and a history of regular menstrual cycle were selected for this study. Computerized software-based dual-task n-back WM tasks were performed by each participant during the proliferative (day 10th - 14th) and secretory phases (day 21st - 25th) of the menstrual cycle. The above tasks were repeated for three consecutive menstrual cycles during follow-up.Data from the three menstrual cycles were pooled and compared between the proliferative and secretory phases. Significant differences were observed in the hit rate (p = 0.006), Z score (p = 0.004) and parametric sensitivity (p = 0.005) of visuospatial targets and Z score (p = 0.037) and parametric sensitivity (p = 0.028) of auditory targets with better performance during the secretory phase. However, no significant differences were found across the three proliferative or three secretory phases, indicating that the results were consistent across consecutive cycles.This study concluded that visuospatial and auditory WM skills were significantly improved during the secretory phase compared to the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1394-1399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2279210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The menstrual cycle is a well-known physiological model used to study working memory (WM) function. The present study examined auditory and visuospatial WM during proliferative and secretory phases of three consecutive menstrual cycles.Forty young adult females with a mean age of 23.4 ± 4.2 years and a history of regular menstrual cycle were selected for this study. Computerized software-based dual-task n-back WM tasks were performed by each participant during the proliferative (day 10th - 14th) and secretory phases (day 21st - 25th) of the menstrual cycle. The above tasks were repeated for three consecutive menstrual cycles during follow-up.Data from the three menstrual cycles were pooled and compared between the proliferative and secretory phases. Significant differences were observed in the hit rate (p = 0.006), Z score (p = 0.004) and parametric sensitivity (p = 0.005) of visuospatial targets and Z score (p = 0.037) and parametric sensitivity (p = 0.028) of auditory targets with better performance during the secretory phase. However, no significant differences were found across the three proliferative or three secretory phases, indicating that the results were consistent across consecutive cycles.This study concluded that visuospatial and auditory WM skills were significantly improved during the secretory phase compared to the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.