The influence of body painting on L4 spinous process palpation accuracy in novice palpators.

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION
William M Scogin, David Sanford, Mary Beth Greenway, Maria Ledbetter, Nicholas B Washmuth
{"title":"The influence of body painting on L4 spinous process palpation accuracy in novice palpators.","authors":"William M Scogin, David Sanford, Mary Beth Greenway, Maria Ledbetter, Nicholas B Washmuth","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2023.2278264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Current literature remains inconclusive regarding the best methodology to accurately palpate lumbar spinous processes (SP). Body painting (BP) uses markers to draw anatomical structures on the skin's surface. While BP can be a useful tool for engaging learners, it is unknown whether it improves palpation accuracy. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the addition of body painting to palpation education improves lumbar spinous process palpation accuracy in first-year Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight DPT students were randomized into a traditional palpation group and a body painting (BP) group. Each group received identical instruction on palpating the lumbar spine, with the BP group additionally drawing lumbar SPs on their laboratory partner with a marker. Students were then assessed on their ability to accurately palpate the L4 SP on randomly assigned subjects. Two Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) used ultrasound imaging to confirm the location of each student's palpation. Palpation time was also recorded. The BP group also completed a survey on the learning experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five percent of students were able to accurately palpate the L4 SP. There was no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.78) in palpation accuracy between the traditional and BP group, although students in the BP group were randomly assigned subjects with a significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.005) higher BMI. Ninety-five percent of students were able to palpate within one spinal level of the L4 SP. Students in the BP group reported that the BP activity facilitated learning and active participation. There was no significant difference in palpation time (<i>p</i> = 0.98) between groups. There was a fair correlation (<i>r</i>=-0.41) between palpation accuracy and subject BMI.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>While body painting was an enjoyable activity to incorporate into palpation laboratory, it is unclear whether it enhanced lumbar SP palpation accuracy in first-year DPT students.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"429-434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2023.2278264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Current literature remains inconclusive regarding the best methodology to accurately palpate lumbar spinous processes (SP). Body painting (BP) uses markers to draw anatomical structures on the skin's surface. While BP can be a useful tool for engaging learners, it is unknown whether it improves palpation accuracy. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the addition of body painting to palpation education improves lumbar spinous process palpation accuracy in first-year Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students.

Methods: Thirty-eight DPT students were randomized into a traditional palpation group and a body painting (BP) group. Each group received identical instruction on palpating the lumbar spine, with the BP group additionally drawing lumbar SPs on their laboratory partner with a marker. Students were then assessed on their ability to accurately palpate the L4 SP on randomly assigned subjects. Two Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) used ultrasound imaging to confirm the location of each student's palpation. Palpation time was also recorded. The BP group also completed a survey on the learning experience.

Results: Forty-five percent of students were able to accurately palpate the L4 SP. There was no significant difference (p = 0.78) in palpation accuracy between the traditional and BP group, although students in the BP group were randomly assigned subjects with a significantly (p = 0.005) higher BMI. Ninety-five percent of students were able to palpate within one spinal level of the L4 SP. Students in the BP group reported that the BP activity facilitated learning and active participation. There was no significant difference in palpation time (p = 0.98) between groups. There was a fair correlation (r=-0.41) between palpation accuracy and subject BMI.

Discussion/conclusion: While body painting was an enjoyable activity to incorporate into palpation laboratory, it is unclear whether it enhanced lumbar SP palpation accuracy in first-year DPT students.

身体彩绘对新手触诊者L4棘突触诊准确性的影响。
目的:关于准确触诊腰棘突(SP)的最佳方法,目前的文献仍然没有定论。身体彩绘(BP)使用标记在皮肤表面绘制解剖结构。虽然BP可以成为吸引学习者的有用工具,但它是否能提高触诊的准确性还不得而知。本研究的目的是调查在物理治疗博士(DPT)一年级学生的触诊教育中添加身体彩绘是否能提高腰椎棘突触诊的准确性。方法:将38名DPT学生随机分为传统触诊组和身体彩绘组。每组都接受了相同的腰椎触诊指导,BP组还用记号笔在其实验室伙伴身上绘制腰椎SP。然后评估学生在随机分配的受试者上准确触诊L4 SP的能力。两名注册护士麻醉师(CRNA)使用超声波成像来确认每个学生触诊的位置。还记录了触觉时间。BP小组还完成了一项关于学习经历的调查。结果:45%的学生能够准确地触诊L4 SP = 0.78),尽管BP组的学生被随机分配到具有显著(p = 0.005)较高的BMI。95%的学生能够在L4 SP的一个脊柱水平内触诊。BP组的学生报告说,BP活动促进了学习和积极参与。触诊时间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.98)。触诊准确性和受试者BMI之间存在相当大的相关性(r=-0.41)。讨论/结论:虽然身体彩绘是一项纳入触诊实验室的愉快活动,但尚不清楚它是否能提高DPT一年级学生的腰椎SP触诊准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信