The Influence of Probe Frequency on Self-Reported Mind Wandering During Tasks With Different Cognitive Loads.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1177/00332941231214504
Hong He, Hong Li
{"title":"The Influence of Probe Frequency on Self-Reported Mind Wandering During Tasks With Different Cognitive Loads.","authors":"Hong He, Hong Li","doi":"10.1177/00332941231214504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of thought-probe methodologies during tasks with varying loads has become commonplace. The current study aimed to investigate whether there exists an interaction between probe frequency and task load on responses of mind wandering episodes, using within-subject designs. In Experiment 1, We performed 0-back, 1-back, and 3-back tasks, in which low-frequency and high-frequency thought probes were presented to the participants. The results indicated that fewer probes led to more reported mind wandering episodes during 0-back and 1-back tasks. Conversely, a significant increase in mind wandering was observed in the 3-back task when higher-frequency probes were used. Experiment 2 introduced the probe relatedness dimension to the medium- and high-load tasks. Both experiments demonstrated that increasing probe frequency reduced mind wandering during the low- and medium-load tasks, but increased it during the high-load task. Additionally, Experiment 2 revealed that higher probe frequency resulted in more probe-related mind wandering during the high-load task, but not during the medium-load task. The current findings reveal the interaction effect of probe frequency and task load on mind wandering and offer possible explanations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"3581-3598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231214504","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of thought-probe methodologies during tasks with varying loads has become commonplace. The current study aimed to investigate whether there exists an interaction between probe frequency and task load on responses of mind wandering episodes, using within-subject designs. In Experiment 1, We performed 0-back, 1-back, and 3-back tasks, in which low-frequency and high-frequency thought probes were presented to the participants. The results indicated that fewer probes led to more reported mind wandering episodes during 0-back and 1-back tasks. Conversely, a significant increase in mind wandering was observed in the 3-back task when higher-frequency probes were used. Experiment 2 introduced the probe relatedness dimension to the medium- and high-load tasks. Both experiments demonstrated that increasing probe frequency reduced mind wandering during the low- and medium-load tasks, but increased it during the high-load task. Additionally, Experiment 2 revealed that higher probe frequency resulted in more probe-related mind wandering during the high-load task, but not during the medium-load task. The current findings reveal the interaction effect of probe frequency and task load on mind wandering and offer possible explanations.

在不同认知负荷的任务中,探究频率对自我报告思维漫游的影响。
在具有不同负载的任务中使用思想探测方法已经变得很常见。目前的研究旨在通过受试者内部设计,调查探针频率和任务负荷之间是否存在对走神事件反应的相互作用。在实验1中,我们执行了0回、1回和3回任务,其中向参与者呈现低频和高频思维探针。结果表明,在0回和1回任务中,较少的探针会导致更多的走神事件。相反,当使用更高频率的探针时,在三背任务中观察到思维漫游的显著增加。实验2将探针相关维度引入到中高负荷任务中。两项实验都表明,在低负荷和中等负荷任务中,增加探测频率可以减少走神,但在高负荷任务中会增加走神。此外,实验2表明,在高负荷任务中,较高的探测频率会导致更多与探测相关的思维游荡,而在中等负荷任务中则不会。目前的研究结果揭示了探针频率和任务负荷对思维游荡的交互作用,并提供了可能的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信