Were public interventions relevant for containing the covid-19 pandemic in Brazil in 2020?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista de saude publica Pub Date : 2023-11-03 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005030
Vitória Berg Cattani, Thaís Araujo Dos Santos, Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves, Julio Castro-Alves
{"title":"Were public interventions relevant for containing the covid-19 pandemic in Brazil in 2020?","authors":"Vitória Berg Cattani, Thaís Araujo Dos Santos, Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves, Julio Castro-Alves","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Flattening the curve was the most promoted public health strategy worldwide, during the pandemic, to slow down the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and, consequently, to avoid overloading the healthcare systems. In Brazil, a relative success of public policies was evidenced. However, the association between public policies and the \"flatten the curve\" objectives remain unclear, as well as the association of different policies to reach this aim. This study aims to verify if the adoption of different public policies was associated with the flattening of the infection and death curves by covid-19 first wave in 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Sistema de Informação da Vigilância Epidemiológica da Gripe (Influenza Epidemiological Surveillance Information System - SIVEP-Gripe) and the Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics - IBGE) were used to compute standardized incidence and mortality rates. The Oxford Covid-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) was used to obtain information about governmental responses related to the mitigation of pandemic effects, and the Human Development Index (HDI) was used as a measure of socioeconomic status. A non-linear least-square method was used to estimate parameters of the five-parameter sigmoidal curve, obtaining the time to reach the peak and the incremental rate of the curves. Additionally, ordinary least-square linear models were used to assess the correlation between the curves and the public policies adopted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 51 municipalities, 261,326 patients had SARS-CoV-2 infection. Stringency Index was associated with reducing covid-19 incremental incidence and death rates,in addition to delaying the time to reach the peak of both pandemic curves. Considering both parameters, economic support policies did not affect the incidence nor the mortality rate curves.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence highlighted the importance and effectiveness of social distancing policies during the first year of the pandemic in Brazil, flattening the curves of mortality and incidence rates. Other policies, such as those focused on economic support, were not effective in flattening the curves but met humanitarian and social outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"57 ","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10609658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Flattening the curve was the most promoted public health strategy worldwide, during the pandemic, to slow down the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and, consequently, to avoid overloading the healthcare systems. In Brazil, a relative success of public policies was evidenced. However, the association between public policies and the "flatten the curve" objectives remain unclear, as well as the association of different policies to reach this aim. This study aims to verify if the adoption of different public policies was associated with the flattening of the infection and death curves by covid-19 first wave in 2020.

Methods: Data from the Sistema de Informação da Vigilância Epidemiológica da Gripe (Influenza Epidemiological Surveillance Information System - SIVEP-Gripe) and the Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics - IBGE) were used to compute standardized incidence and mortality rates. The Oxford Covid-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) was used to obtain information about governmental responses related to the mitigation of pandemic effects, and the Human Development Index (HDI) was used as a measure of socioeconomic status. A non-linear least-square method was used to estimate parameters of the five-parameter sigmoidal curve, obtaining the time to reach the peak and the incremental rate of the curves. Additionally, ordinary least-square linear models were used to assess the correlation between the curves and the public policies adopted.

Results: Out of 51 municipalities, 261,326 patients had SARS-CoV-2 infection. Stringency Index was associated with reducing covid-19 incremental incidence and death rates,in addition to delaying the time to reach the peak of both pandemic curves. Considering both parameters, economic support policies did not affect the incidence nor the mortality rate curves.

Conclusion: The evidence highlighted the importance and effectiveness of social distancing policies during the first year of the pandemic in Brazil, flattening the curves of mortality and incidence rates. Other policies, such as those focused on economic support, were not effective in flattening the curves but met humanitarian and social outcomes.

公共干预措施是否与2020年巴西遏制新冠肺炎疫情有关?
目标:在疫情期间,拉平曲线是全球最受欢迎的公共卫生策略,以减缓严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的传播,从而避免医疗系统过载。在巴西,公共政策取得了相对成功。然而,公共政策与“拉平曲线”目标之间的联系,以及实现这一目标的不同政策之间的联系仍然不清楚。这项研究旨在验证采取不同的公共政策是否与2020年新冠肺炎第一波疫情导致的感染和死亡曲线变平有关(巴西地理和统计研究所-IBGE)用于计算标准化发病率和死亡率。牛津新冠肺炎政府应对追踪(OxCGRT)用于获取与缓解疫情影响相关的政府应对信息,人类发展指数(HDI)用于衡量社会经济地位。采用非线性最小二乘法对五参数S形曲线的参数进行估计,得到曲线达到峰值的时间和增量率。此外,还使用普通最小二乘线性模型来评估曲线与所采取的公共政策之间的相关性。结果:在51个市镇中,261326名患者感染了严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型。严格指数与降低新冠肺炎新增发病率和死亡率有关,此外还推迟了达到两种大流行曲线峰值的时间。考虑到这两个参数,经济支持政策既没有影响发病率,也没有影响死亡率曲线。结论:这些证据突出了巴西疫情第一年保持社交距离政策的重要性和有效性,使死亡率和发病率曲线变平。其他政策,如侧重于经济支持的政策,在拉平曲线方面并不有效,但符合人道主义和社会成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de saude publica
Revista de saude publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Saúde Pública has the purpose of publishing original scientific contributions on topics of relevance to public health in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信