Clinicopathological Characteristics and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Were Intraoperatively Diagnosed Non-Curative.
{"title":"Clinicopathological Characteristics and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Were Intraoperatively Diagnosed Non-Curative.","authors":"Takahito Sugase, Takashi Kanemura, Tomohira Takeoka, Keijiro Sugimura, Masaaki Yamamoto, Naoki Shinno, Hisashi Hara, Takeshi Omori, Yosuke Mukai, Manabu Mikamori, Shinichiro Hasegawa, Naotsugu Haraguchi, Hirofumi Akita, Junichi Nishimura, Hiroshi Wada, Chu Matsuda, Masayoshi Yasui, Hiroshi Miyata","doi":"10.1159/000533772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Curative esophagectomy is not always possible in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, few studies have investigated patients who underwent non-curative surgery with intraoperative judgment. This study aimed to investigate patient characteristics and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing non-curative surgery and compare them between non-resectional and non-radical surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 989 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were preoperatively expected for curative esophagectomy, 66 who were eligible for non-curative surgery were included in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative diagnosis of T4b accounted for 93% of the reasons for the failure of curative surgery. In those patients, esophageal cancer locally invaded into the aortobronchial constriction (70%), trachea (25%), or pulmonary vein (5%). Lymph node metastasis mainly invaded into the trachea (50%) or bronchus (28%). The overall survival of patients with non-curative surgery was 51.5%, 25.7%, and 10.4% at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, respectively. Although there were no differences in preoperative patient characteristics between non-resectional and non-radical surgery, distant metastasis, especially pleural dissemination, was significantly observed in T4b patients due to esophageal cancer with non-radical surgery than those with non-resectional surgery (35% vs. 15%, p = 0.002). Even in patients with non-curative surgery, R1 resection and postoperative chemoradiotherapy were identified as independent factors for survival 1 year after surgery (p = 0.047, and 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>T4b tumor located in aortobronchial constriction or trachea/bronchus makes it difficult to diagnose whether it is resectable or unresectable. Moreover, surgical procedures and perioperative treatment were deeply associated with the clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533772","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Curative esophagectomy is not always possible in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, few studies have investigated patients who underwent non-curative surgery with intraoperative judgment. This study aimed to investigate patient characteristics and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing non-curative surgery and compare them between non-resectional and non-radical surgery.
Methods: Among 989 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were preoperatively expected for curative esophagectomy, 66 who were eligible for non-curative surgery were included in this study.
Results: Intraoperative diagnosis of T4b accounted for 93% of the reasons for the failure of curative surgery. In those patients, esophageal cancer locally invaded into the aortobronchial constriction (70%), trachea (25%), or pulmonary vein (5%). Lymph node metastasis mainly invaded into the trachea (50%) or bronchus (28%). The overall survival of patients with non-curative surgery was 51.5%, 25.7%, and 10.4% at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, respectively. Although there were no differences in preoperative patient characteristics between non-resectional and non-radical surgery, distant metastasis, especially pleural dissemination, was significantly observed in T4b patients due to esophageal cancer with non-radical surgery than those with non-resectional surgery (35% vs. 15%, p = 0.002). Even in patients with non-curative surgery, R1 resection and postoperative chemoradiotherapy were identified as independent factors for survival 1 year after surgery (p = 0.047, and 0.019).
Conclusions: T4b tumor located in aortobronchial constriction or trachea/bronchus makes it difficult to diagnose whether it is resectable or unresectable. Moreover, surgical procedures and perioperative treatment were deeply associated with the clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.