United States regulatory approval of medical devices used for endovascular neurosurgery: A two-decade review of FDA regulatory files.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Lokeshwar S Bhenderu, Trevor Hardigan, Jorge Roa, Brandon D Philbrick, Alex Hoang, Amir H Faraji, Gavin W Britz, Kurt A Yaeger
{"title":"United States regulatory approval of medical devices used for endovascular neurosurgery: A two-decade review of FDA regulatory files.","authors":"Lokeshwar S Bhenderu, Trevor Hardigan, Jorge Roa, Brandon D Philbrick, Alex Hoang, Amir H Faraji, Gavin W Britz, Kurt A Yaeger","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2023-020703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evolution of neuroendovascular technologies has progressed substantially. Over the last two decades, the introduction of new endovascular devices has facilitated treatment for more patients, and as a result, the regulatory environment concerning neuroendovascular devices has evolved rapidly in response.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine trends in the approval of neuroendovascular devices by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the last 20 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Open-access US FDA databases were queried between January 2000 and December 2022 for all devices approved by the Neurological Devices Advisory Committee. Neuroendovascular devices were manually classified and grouped by category. Device approval data, including approval times, approval pathway, and presence of predicate devices, were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3186 neurological devices were approved via various US FDA pathways during the study period. 320 (10.0%) corresponded to neuroendovascular devices, of which 301 (94.1%) were approved via the 510(k) pathway. The percentage of 510(k) pathway neuroendovascular devices increased from 6.9% to 14.3% of all neuro devices before and after 2015, respectively. There was an increase in approval times for neuroendovascular devices cleared after 2015.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over the last two decades, the neuroendovascular device armamentarium has rapidly expanded, especially after positive stroke trials in 2015. Regulatory approval times are significantly affected by device category, generation, company size, and company location, and a vast majority are approved by the 510(k) pathway. These results can guide further innovation in the endovascular device space and may act as a roadmap for future regulatory planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1216-1219"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-020703","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The evolution of neuroendovascular technologies has progressed substantially. Over the last two decades, the introduction of new endovascular devices has facilitated treatment for more patients, and as a result, the regulatory environment concerning neuroendovascular devices has evolved rapidly in response.

Objective: To examine trends in the approval of neuroendovascular devices by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the last 20 years.

Methods: Open-access US FDA databases were queried between January 2000 and December 2022 for all devices approved by the Neurological Devices Advisory Committee. Neuroendovascular devices were manually classified and grouped by category. Device approval data, including approval times, approval pathway, and presence of predicate devices, were examined.

Results: A total of 3186 neurological devices were approved via various US FDA pathways during the study period. 320 (10.0%) corresponded to neuroendovascular devices, of which 301 (94.1%) were approved via the 510(k) pathway. The percentage of 510(k) pathway neuroendovascular devices increased from 6.9% to 14.3% of all neuro devices before and after 2015, respectively. There was an increase in approval times for neuroendovascular devices cleared after 2015.

Conclusion: Over the last two decades, the neuroendovascular device armamentarium has rapidly expanded, especially after positive stroke trials in 2015. Regulatory approval times are significantly affected by device category, generation, company size, and company location, and a vast majority are approved by the 510(k) pathway. These results can guide further innovation in the endovascular device space and may act as a roadmap for future regulatory planning.

美国监管部门批准用于血管内神经外科的医疗器械:美国食品药品监督管理局监管文件20年回顾。
背景:神经血管内技术的发展取得了实质性进展。在过去的二十年里,新的血管内设备的引入促进了更多患者的治疗,因此,与神经血管内设备相关的监管环境也迅速发展。目的:研究过去20年来美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准神经血管内装置的趋势。方法:在2000年1月至2022年12月期间,对神经设备咨询委员会批准的所有设备的开放式美国食品药品监督管理局数据库进行查询。人工对神经血管内装置进行分类并按类别分组。检查器械批准数据,包括批准时间、批准途径和是否存在上游器械。结果:在研究期间,共有3186种神经设备通过美国食品药品监督管理局的各种途径获得批准。320个(10.0%)对应于神经血管内装置,其中301个(94.1%)通过510(k)途径获得批准。2015年前后,510(k)通路神经血管内装置在所有神经装置中的比例分别从6.9%增加到14.3%。2015年后批准的神经血管内装置的批准时间有所增加。结论:在过去的二十年里,神经血管内器械的规模迅速扩大,尤其是在2015年中风试验呈阳性之后。监管批准时间受设备类别、生产、公司规模和公司位置的显著影响,绝大多数都是通过510(k)途径批准的。这些结果可以指导血管内装置领域的进一步创新,并可以作为未来监管规划的路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信