Therapy Efficacy of Idiopathic Ventricular Extrasystoles: A Real Life Study.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2023-10-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/5590422
Aliisa Lönnrot, Jaakko Inkovaara, Olli Arola, Tero Penttilä, Heikki Mäkynen, Katriina Aalto-Setälä, Sinikka Yli-Mäyry
{"title":"Therapy Efficacy of Idiopathic Ventricular Extrasystoles: A Real Life Study.","authors":"Aliisa Lönnrot,&nbsp;Jaakko Inkovaara,&nbsp;Olli Arola,&nbsp;Tero Penttilä,&nbsp;Heikki Mäkynen,&nbsp;Katriina Aalto-Setälä,&nbsp;Sinikka Yli-Mäyry","doi":"10.1155/2023/5590422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventricular extrasystoles (VESs) are common and often harmless in a healthy heart, but they can significantly affect the quality of life. If changes in lifestyle and antiarrhythmic medication are not enough, invasive and often curative catheter ablation can be considered. Better understanding of the conformation of VESs with a 12-lead ECG, as well as their precise localization, have increased their treatment with catheter ablation. Our goal was to determine whether the anatomical site of VES had an effect on procedure success. We also analyzed the safety of the procedure and patient-related factors affecting the results.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we analyzed the medical records of 63 consecutive patients with multiple idiopathic VESs treated by catheter ablation at Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, during 2017 and 2018. Patients with structural heart disease were excluded. Ablation success was estimated with two endpoints, primary and follow-up success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the patients received treatment on the right ventricular outflow tract (66.7%), others on the left ventricle (17.5%), or the aortic cusp (9.5%). The site of origin remained unknown in four procedures (6.3% of patients). Primary success was observed in 48 procedures (76.2%). During the follow-up period of three months, the procedure was successful in 70.3% of the cases. The anatomical site of VES had no significant effect on either primary or follow-up success. Those with a successful follow-up result had a lower body mass index (BMI = 26.4) than those who had an unsuccessful result (BMI = 28.7; <i>p</i>=0.069); this did not reach statistical significance, potentially due to the small study population size. Complications were observed in three patients (4.5%). All of them were related to the catheter insertion site.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For a symptomatic patient, catheter ablation is an effective and often fully curative treatment. The success rate was similar regardless of the site of VESs. This suggests that catheter ablation should also be assessed early on for other cases besides classic right ventricular outflow tract VESs. A high BMI was the only factor associated with a poor procedure success rate. The procedure itself is safe, and adverse effects are rare. The radiation dose is also low partly due to the current magnetic navigation method.</p>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"5590422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5590422","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ventricular extrasystoles (VESs) are common and often harmless in a healthy heart, but they can significantly affect the quality of life. If changes in lifestyle and antiarrhythmic medication are not enough, invasive and often curative catheter ablation can be considered. Better understanding of the conformation of VESs with a 12-lead ECG, as well as their precise localization, have increased their treatment with catheter ablation. Our goal was to determine whether the anatomical site of VES had an effect on procedure success. We also analyzed the safety of the procedure and patient-related factors affecting the results.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the medical records of 63 consecutive patients with multiple idiopathic VESs treated by catheter ablation at Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, during 2017 and 2018. Patients with structural heart disease were excluded. Ablation success was estimated with two endpoints, primary and follow-up success.

Results: The majority of the patients received treatment on the right ventricular outflow tract (66.7%), others on the left ventricle (17.5%), or the aortic cusp (9.5%). The site of origin remained unknown in four procedures (6.3% of patients). Primary success was observed in 48 procedures (76.2%). During the follow-up period of three months, the procedure was successful in 70.3% of the cases. The anatomical site of VES had no significant effect on either primary or follow-up success. Those with a successful follow-up result had a lower body mass index (BMI = 26.4) than those who had an unsuccessful result (BMI = 28.7; p=0.069); this did not reach statistical significance, potentially due to the small study population size. Complications were observed in three patients (4.5%). All of them were related to the catheter insertion site.

Conclusions: For a symptomatic patient, catheter ablation is an effective and often fully curative treatment. The success rate was similar regardless of the site of VESs. This suggests that catheter ablation should also be assessed early on for other cases besides classic right ventricular outflow tract VESs. A high BMI was the only factor associated with a poor procedure success rate. The procedure itself is safe, and adverse effects are rare. The radiation dose is also low partly due to the current magnetic navigation method.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

特发性室性早搏的治疗效果:一项现实生活研究。
背景:室性早搏(VES)在健康的心脏中很常见,通常是无害的,但它们会显著影响生活质量。如果生活方式的改变和抗心律失常药物还不够,可以考虑进行侵入性且通常是治疗性的导管消融。更好地了解具有12导联心电图的VES的构象及其精确定位,增加了导管消融的治疗。我们的目标是确定VES的解剖部位是否对手术成功有影响。我们还分析了手术的安全性以及影响结果的患者相关因素。材料和方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了2017年和2018年在坦佩雷大学医院心脏医院接受导管消融治疗的63名连续的多发性特发性VES患者的医疗记录。结构性心脏病患者被排除在外。消融成功率通过两个终点进行评估,即初次和随访成功率。结果:大多数患者在右心室流出道接受治疗(66.7%),其他患者在左心室接受治疗(17.5%),或在主动脉瓣接受治疗(9.5%)。在四次手术中,起源部位仍然未知(6.3%的患者)。48例(76.2%)手术取得了初步成功。在三个月的随访期间,70.3%的病例手术成功。VES的解剖部位对初次或随访的成功没有显著影响。那些随访成功的患者的体重指数(BMI)较低 = 26.4)比那些没有成功的结果(BMI = 28.7;p=0.069);这并没有达到统计学意义,可能是由于研究人群规模较小。3例(4.5%)患者出现并发症,均与导管插入部位有关。结论:对于有症状的患者,导管消融术是一种有效且经常完全治愈的治疗方法。无论VES的位置如何,成功率都是相似的。这表明,除经典的右心室流出道VES外,其他病例也应尽早评估导管消融。高BMI是唯一与手术成功率低相关的因素。手术本身是安全的,不良反应很少。辐射剂量也较低,部分原因是当前的磁导航方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信