Comparison of Automated Spike Detection Software in Detecting Epileptiform Abnormalities on Scalp-EEG of Genetic Generalized Epilepsy Patients.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000001039
Mubeen Janmohamed, Duong Nhu, Lubna Shakathreh, Ofer Gonen, Levin Kuhlman, Amanda Gilligan, Chang Wei Tan, Piero Perucca, Terence J O'Brien, Patrick Kwan
{"title":"Comparison of Automated Spike Detection Software in Detecting Epileptiform Abnormalities on Scalp-EEG of Genetic Generalized Epilepsy Patients.","authors":"Mubeen Janmohamed, Duong Nhu, Lubna Shakathreh, Ofer Gonen, Levin Kuhlman, Amanda Gilligan, Chang Wei Tan, Piero Perucca, Terence J O'Brien, Patrick Kwan","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite availability of commercial EEG software for automated epileptiform detection, validation on real-world EEG datasets is lacking. Performance evaluation of two software packages on a large EEG dataset of patients with genetic generalized epilepsy was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three epileptologists labelled IEDs manually of EEGs from three centres. All Interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) markings predicted by two commercial software (Encevis 1.11 and Persyst 14) were reviewed individually to assess for suspicious missed markings and were integrated into the reference standard if overlooked during manual annotation during a second phase. Sensitivity, precision, specificity, and F1-score were used to assess the performance of the software packages against the adjusted reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty-five routine scalp EEG recordings from different subjects were included (total recording time, 310.7 hours). The total epileptiform discharge reference count was 5,907 (including spikes and fragments). Encevis demonstrated a mean sensitivity for detection of IEDs of 0.46 (SD 0.32), mean precision of 0.37 (SD 0.31), and mean F1-score of 0.43 (SD 0.23). Using the default medium setting, the sensitivity of Persyst was 0.67 (SD 0.31), with a precision of 0.49 (SD 0.33) and F1-score of 0.51 (SD 0.25). Mean specificity representing non-IED window identification and classification was 0.973 (SD 0.08) for Encevis and 0.968 (SD 0.07) for Persyst.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated software shows a high degree of specificity for detection of nonepileptiform background. Sensitivity and precision for IED detection is lower, but may be acceptable for initial screening in the clinical and research setting. Clinical caution and continuous expert human oversight are recommended with all EEG recordings before a diagnostic interpretation is provided based on the output of the software.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"618-624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite availability of commercial EEG software for automated epileptiform detection, validation on real-world EEG datasets is lacking. Performance evaluation of two software packages on a large EEG dataset of patients with genetic generalized epilepsy was performed.

Methods: Three epileptologists labelled IEDs manually of EEGs from three centres. All Interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) markings predicted by two commercial software (Encevis 1.11 and Persyst 14) were reviewed individually to assess for suspicious missed markings and were integrated into the reference standard if overlooked during manual annotation during a second phase. Sensitivity, precision, specificity, and F1-score were used to assess the performance of the software packages against the adjusted reference standard.

Results: One hundred and twenty-five routine scalp EEG recordings from different subjects were included (total recording time, 310.7 hours). The total epileptiform discharge reference count was 5,907 (including spikes and fragments). Encevis demonstrated a mean sensitivity for detection of IEDs of 0.46 (SD 0.32), mean precision of 0.37 (SD 0.31), and mean F1-score of 0.43 (SD 0.23). Using the default medium setting, the sensitivity of Persyst was 0.67 (SD 0.31), with a precision of 0.49 (SD 0.33) and F1-score of 0.51 (SD 0.25). Mean specificity representing non-IED window identification and classification was 0.973 (SD 0.08) for Encevis and 0.968 (SD 0.07) for Persyst.

Conclusions: Automated software shows a high degree of specificity for detection of nonepileptiform background. Sensitivity and precision for IED detection is lower, but may be acceptable for initial screening in the clinical and research setting. Clinical caution and continuous expert human oversight are recommended with all EEG recordings before a diagnostic interpretation is provided based on the output of the software.

自动棘波检测软件检测遗传性癫痫患者头皮脑电图癫痫样异常的比较。
目的:尽管商业脑电图软件可用于癫痫样自动检测,但缺乏对真实世界脑电图数据集的验证。在遗传性广泛性癫痫患者的大型脑电图数据集上对两个软件包进行了性能评估。方法:三名癫痫学家对三个中心的脑电图进行IED手动标记。对两个商业软件(Encevis 1.11和Persyst 14)预测的所有发作间癫痫样放电(IED)标记进行单独审查,以评估可疑的遗漏标记,如果在第二阶段的手动注释中被忽视,则将其纳入参考标准。灵敏度、精密度、特异性和F1评分用于评估软件包相对于调整后的参考标准的性能。结果:包括125个来自不同受试者的常规头皮脑电图记录(总记录时间为310.7小时)。总的癫痫样放电参考计数为5907(包括尖峰和碎片)。Encevis检测IED的平均灵敏度为0.46(标准差0.32),平均精密度为0.37(标准差0.31),平均F1得分为0.43(标准差0.23)。使用默认介质设置,Persyst的灵敏度为0.67(标准差0.301),精密度为0.49(SD 0.33),F1评分为0.51(SD 0.25)。代表非IED窗口识别和分类的平均特异度对于Encevis为0.973(SD 0.08),对于Persyst为0.968(SD 0.07)。IED检测的灵敏度和精度较低,但对于临床和研究环境中的初步筛查来说可能是可以接受的。在根据软件输出提供诊断解释之前,建议对所有脑电图记录进行临床谨慎和持续的专家人工监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信