Comparing Vitamin D Level Between Patients with Psoriasis and Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.3 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Mahmood Moosazadeh, Giovanni Damiani, Mohammad Khademloo, Motahareh Kheradmand, Fatemeh Nabinezhad-Male, Amirhossein Hessami
{"title":"Comparing Vitamin D Level Between Patients with Psoriasis and Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mahmood Moosazadeh, Giovanni Damiani, Mohammad Khademloo, Motahareh Kheradmand, Fatemeh Nabinezhad-Male, Amirhossein Hessami","doi":"10.1177/2515690X231211663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psoriasis is nowadays regarded as a systemic inflammatory disorder. Among the topicals, vitamin D derivates are often applied on the skin for their anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory properties. Vitamin D serum levels in psoriasis (PsO) patients are still debated and an eventual depletion may offer the rational to integrate anti-psoriatic therapies with oral vitamin D. Then, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the current evidence towards serum vitamin D level in PsO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, ScienceDirect and Science Information Database (SID) using the terms \"Vitamin D\" and \"Psoriasis\" including manuscripts in English, Italian and Persian. Duplications were excluded using EndNote software and records were screened by title, abstract and full-text. Quality assessment of studies was assessed using Newcastle Ottawa Checklist (NOS). Psoriasis odds ratio (OR) and mean serum vitamin D levels were calculated and displayed in Forest-plots. Heterogeneity indexes were evaluated using <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> and Q. Sensitivity analysis and publication biases were also considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 3006 records extracted, after removing duplicates and analyzing full texts we finally included 19 manuscripts involving a total of 1387 PsO cases and 6939 controls. PsO patients exhibited a substantial odds ratio (3.07, 95% CI: 1.56-6.04) for lower serum vitamin D levels compared to the control group. Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) of vitamin D in PsO versus controls was -0.92 (-1.33 to -0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psoriatic patients displayed higher risk to have a vitamin D deficiency. Interventional studies to verify the preventive value are mandatory.</p>","PeriodicalId":15714,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515690X231211663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psoriasis is nowadays regarded as a systemic inflammatory disorder. Among the topicals, vitamin D derivates are often applied on the skin for their anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory properties. Vitamin D serum levels in psoriasis (PsO) patients are still debated and an eventual depletion may offer the rational to integrate anti-psoriatic therapies with oral vitamin D. Then, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the current evidence towards serum vitamin D level in PsO.

Methods: We searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, ScienceDirect and Science Information Database (SID) using the terms "Vitamin D" and "Psoriasis" including manuscripts in English, Italian and Persian. Duplications were excluded using EndNote software and records were screened by title, abstract and full-text. Quality assessment of studies was assessed using Newcastle Ottawa Checklist (NOS). Psoriasis odds ratio (OR) and mean serum vitamin D levels were calculated and displayed in Forest-plots. Heterogeneity indexes were evaluated using I2 and Q. Sensitivity analysis and publication biases were also considered.

Results: From 3006 records extracted, after removing duplicates and analyzing full texts we finally included 19 manuscripts involving a total of 1387 PsO cases and 6939 controls. PsO patients exhibited a substantial odds ratio (3.07, 95% CI: 1.56-6.04) for lower serum vitamin D levels compared to the control group. Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) of vitamin D in PsO versus controls was -0.92 (-1.33 to -0.51).

Conclusion: Psoriatic patients displayed higher risk to have a vitamin D deficiency. Interventional studies to verify the preventive value are mandatory.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

银屑病患者和健康人维生素D水平的比较:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:银屑病目前被认为是一种全身炎症性疾病。在局部用药中,维生素D衍生物因其抗炎和免疫调节特性而经常应用于皮肤。银屑病(PsO)患者的维生素D血清水平仍存在争议,最终的消耗可能为将抗银屑病治疗与口服维生素D相结合提供合理的依据。然后,我们旨在对目前关于银屑病患者血清维生素D水平的证据进行系统综述和荟萃分析。方法:我们在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Sciences,ScienceDirect和科学信息数据库(SID),使用术语“维生素D”和“银屑病”,包括英语、意大利语和波斯语的手稿。使用EndNote软件排除重复,并按标题、摘要和全文筛选记录。研究质量评估采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华检查表(NOS)进行评估。计算银屑病比值比(OR)和平均血清维生素D水平,并在Forest图中显示。使用I2和Q评估异质性指数。还考虑了敏感性分析和发表偏倚。结果:从提取的3006份记录中,在去除重复并分析全文后,我们最终纳入了19份手稿,共涉及1387例精神分裂症病例和6939例对照。与对照组相比,精神分裂症患者血清维生素D水平较低的优势比(3.07,95%CI:1.56-6.04)显著降低。银屑病患者与对照组维生素D的标准化平均差(SMD)为-0.92(-1.33至-0.51)。结论:银屑病患者维生素D缺乏的风险更高。验证预防价值的干预研究是强制性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine
Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信